Grafting of tooth extraction socket with inorganic bovine bone or bioactive glass particles: Comparative histometric study in rats

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 260-269

  Calixto, Romeu Felipe Elias ^a   Teófilo, Juliana Mazzonetto ^b   Brentegani, Luiz Guilherme ^a   Lamano Carvalho, Teresa Lúocia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Department of Pathology   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Alveolar healing; Bioactive glass; Bone healing; Inorganic bovine bone graft

Indexed keywords

BIOGLASS; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CATTLE; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RAT; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CATTLE; CERAMICS; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548587272     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3180500b95     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Sanada JT, Canova GC, Cestari TM, et al. Histolic radiographic and immunoglobuline profile analysis after implantation of blocks of demineralized bovine cancellous bone graft In muscle of rats, J Appl Oral Sci. 2003;11:209-215.
2. Christensen GJ. Ridge preservation: Why not? J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:669-670.
3. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, et al. Influence of bloactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:581-586.
4. Perri de Carvalho PS, Bassi APF, Pereira LAVD, Review and proposal of nomenclature for biomaterlals. Implant News. 2004;1:255-260.
5. Geiger M, Li RH, Friess W. Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:1613-1629.
6. Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA. Bone replacement grafts: The bone substitutes. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:491-503.
7. Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT. Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration, Periodontol 2000. 1993;1:80-91.
8. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:354-361.
9. Lin WL, McCulloch CA, Cho MI. Differentiation of periodontal ligament fibroblasts into osteoblasts during socket healing after tooth extraction in the rat. Anat Rec. 1994;240:492-506.
10. Lamano Carvalho TL, Brentegani LG, Bombonato KF. Histometric analysis of rat alveolar wound healing. Braz Dent J. 1997;8:9-12.
11. Devlin H. Early bone healing events following rat molar tooth extraction. Cells Tissues Organs. 2000;167:33-37.
12. Elsubeihi ES, Heersche JN. Quantitative assessment of post-extraction healing and alveolar ridge remodeling of the mandible In female rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:401-412.
13. Santos PV Jr, Melhado R. Effects of ultrasonic stimulation on tooth extraction wound healing: Histological study in rats. Rev Odontol UNESP. 1990;19:291-299.
14. Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL. Alveolar wound healing and ridge remodeling after tooth extraction in the rat: A histologic, radiographic, and histometric study, J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:359-364.
15. Valentin P, Abensur D, Densari D, et al. Histological evaluation of Bio-Oss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:59-64.
16. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months, J Periodontol. 2000;71:1015-1023.
17. Araújo MG, Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, et al. Orthodontic movement In bone defects augmented with Bio-Oss®. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28:73-80.
18. Orsini G, Traini T, Scarano A, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with BioOss(R) particles: A light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy study in man. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;74:448-457.
19. Merkx MA, Maltha JC, Stoelinga PJ. Assessment of the value of anorganic bone additives in sinus floor augmentation: A review of clinical reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:1-6.
20. Oonishi H, Kushitani S, Yasukawa E, et al. Particulate bioglass compared with hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute, Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;334:316-325.
21. Chan C, Thompson I, Robinson P, et al. Evaluation of bioglass/dextran composite as a bone graft substitute, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:73-77.
22. Candan DC, Hochuli-Vieira E, Marcantonio RA, et al. Utilization of autogenous bone, bioactive glasses, and calcium phosphate cement In surgical mandibular bone defects in Cebus apella monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:73-79.
23. Candan DC, Hochuli-Vieira E, Marcantonio RA, et al. Use of BioGran and Calcitite in bone defects: Histologic study In monkeys (Cebus apella). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:859-864.
24. Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Nyengaard JR, et al, Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and bioactive glass (Biogran) arrest bone formation when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration (GTR): An experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:636-643.
25. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Hayacibara R, et al. Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced-augmented and non-augmented-defects In the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontal. 2005;32:435-440.
26. Okamoto T, Okamoto R, Alves Rezende MCR, et al. Interference of the blood clot on granulation tissue formation after tooth extraction. Histomorphological study In rats. Braz Dent J. 1994;5:85-92.
27. Okamoto T, Garcia IR Jr, Mori GG, et al. Implante heterógeno de osso anorgânico ao nível do tecido conjuntivo subcutâneo de rato. Estudo microscópio. Innovations J. 1999;3:26-29.
28. Cauwels RG, Martens LC. The use of anorganic bovine bone to correct a residual osseous defect after tooth extrusion: Report of case. ASDC J Dent Child. 1999;66:273-277.
29. Callan DP, Rohrer MD. Use of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite In the treatment of edentulous ridge defects: A human clinical and histologic case report. J Periodontol. 1993;64:575-582.
30. Mellonig JT. Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived bone xenograft In the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:19-29.
31. Pinholt EM, Bang G, Haanaes HR, Alveolar ridge augmentation In rats by Bio-Oss. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99:154-161.
32. Low SB, King CJ, Krieger J. An evaluation of bloactive ceramic in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17:359-367.
33. Shapoff CA, Alexander DC, Clark AE. Clinical use of a bioactive glass particulate in the treatment of human osseous defects, Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997;18:352-358.
34. Froum SJ, Weinberg MA, Tarnow D. Comparison of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal defects. A clinical study. J Periodontol. 1998;69:698-709.
35. Han J, Meng H, Xu L. Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002;37:225-227.
36. Sculean A, Barbe G, Chiantella GC, et al. Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects In humans. J Periodontol. 2002;73:401-408.
37. Froum S, Cho SC, Rosenberg E, et al. Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bloactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: A pilot study. J Periodontol. 2002;73:94-102.
38. Norton MR, Wilson J. Dental implants placed In extraction sites implanted with bloactive glass: Human histology and clinical outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:249-257.
39. Nevins ML, Camelo M, Nevins M, et al, Human histologic evaluation of bioactive ceramic in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:458-467.
40. Sculean A, Windisch P, Keglevich T, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:139-147.
41. Schepers EJG, Ducheyne P. Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range for the treatment of oral bone defects: A 1-24 month experiment with several materials and particle sizes and ranges. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:171-181.
42. Fetner AE, Hartingan MS, Low SB, Periodontal repair using PerioGlas in non-human primates: Clinical and histologic observations. Compendium. 1994;15:932-935
43. Wilson J, Clark AE, Hall M, et al. Tissue response to bioglass endosseous ridge maintenance implants. J Oral Implantol. 1993;9:295-302.
44. Teófilo JM, Brenteganl LG, Lamano-Carvalho TL. Bone healing in osteoporotic female rats following ¡ntraalveolar grafting of bloactive glass. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:755-762.
45. Furusawa T, Mizunuma K, Yamashita S, et al. Investigation of early bone formation using resorbable glass in the rat mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:672-676.
46. Wheeler DL, Stokes KE, Hoellrich RG, et al. Effect of bloactive glass particle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41:527-533.
47. Schmitt JM, Buck DC, Joh S, et al. Comparison of porous bone mineral and biologically active glass In critical-sized defects. J Periodontol. 1997;68:1043-1053.