Neuroethical concerns about moderating traumatic memories

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 38-40

  Liao, S Matthew ^a   Wasserman, David T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; PROPRANOLOL;

BIOETHICS; CONSCIENCE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; MEMORY; MORALITY; NOTE; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER;

ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; CONSCIENCE; HUMANS; MEMORY; MORALS; PROPRANOLOL; STRESS DISORDERS, POST-TRAUMATIC;

EID: 34548585601     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701518623     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Henry, M., J. R. Fishman, and S. J. Youngner. 2007. Propranolol and the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder: Is it wrong to erase the "sting" of bad memories? American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 7(9): 12-20.
2. Liao, S. M., and A. Sandberg. 2007. The normativity of memory modifications. In press.
3. President's Council of Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4. Wasserman, D. 2004. Making memory lose its sting. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 24(4): 12-18.