Introduction: Managing patients with chronic angina: Emerging therapeutic options for improving clinical efficacy and outcomes

Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy

Volumn 12, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2006, Pages

  Rumsfeld, John S ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIANGINA PECTORIS AGENT; RANOLAZINE;

ANGINA PECTORIS; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MORTALITY; PATHOGENESIS; PATIENT CARE; PREVALENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACETANILIDES; ANGINA, STABLE; CARDIOVASCULAR AGENTS; CHRONIC DISEASE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; PIPERAZINES;

EID: 34548582086     PISSN: 10834087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006; 113:e85-e151. Available at: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCULATIONAHA. 105.171600v1. Accessed April 7, 2006.
2. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). Available at: http://www.americanheart. org/downloadable/heart/1044991838085StableAnginaNewFigs.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2006.
3. Kim J, Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, et al. Health-related quality of life after interventional or conservative strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: one-year results of the third Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina (RITA-3). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:221-28.
4. Dougherty CM, Dewhurst T, Nichol WP, et al. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:569-75.
5. Beinart SC, Sales AE, Spertus JA, et al. Impact of angina burden and other factors on treatment satisfaction after acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2003;146:646-52.
6. Spertus JA, Jones P, McDonell M, et al. Health status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease. Circulation. 2002;106:43-49.
7. Carasso S, Markiewicz W. Medical treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris referred for coronary angiography: failure of treatment or failure to treat. Clin Cardiol. 2002;25:436-41.
8. Beaulieu MD, Blais R, Jacques A, et al. Are patients suffering from stable angina receiving optimal medical treatment? QJM. 2001;94:301-08.
9. Wiest FC, Bryson CL, Burman M, et al. Suboptimal pharmacotherapeutic management of chronic stable angina in the primary care setting. Am J Med. 2004;117:234-41.
10. Pepine CJ, Abrams J, Marks RG, et al. Characteristics of a contemporary population with angina pectoris. TIDES Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:226-31.
11. Spertus JA, Krumholz HM, Reid K, et al. Predictors of angina after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the PREMIER Study. Am J Cardiol. 2006. In press.
12. Rumsfeld JS, Magid DJ, Sales AE, et al. History of depression, angina, and quality of life following acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2003;145:493-99.