Learning from law's past: A call for caution in incorporating new innovations in neuroscience

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 73-75

  Bard, Jennifer S ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BRAIN MAPPING; DNA FINGERPRINTING; HANDWRITING; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; NEUROSCIENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RECUMBENCY; REVIEW;

BIOETHICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BRAIN MAPPING; DECEPTION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; HANDWRITING; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROSCIENCES;

EID: 34548575329     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701518888     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Areen, J., et al. 1996. Law, science and medicine, 2nd ed. Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press.
2. Arcabascio, C. 2007. Chimeras: Double the DNA-double the fun for crime scene investigators, prosecutors, and defense attorneys? Akron Law Review 40: 435.
3. Loftus, E. 1996. Eye witness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Mueller, C., and L. Kirkpatrick. 2003. Evidence. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.
5. Sutton, V. 2001. Law and science. New York, NY: Carolina Press.
6. Tovino, S. A. 2007. Functional neuroimaging and the law: Trends and directions for future scholarship. American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 7(9): 44-56.