Cyberstalking: The Technology of Hate

Police Journal

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 204-221

  Bocij, Paul ^a   McFarlane, Leroy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548562330     PISSN: 0032258X     EISSN: 17405599     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1350/pojo.76.3.204.19442     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bandura A. (1999) ‘Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities’ Personality and Social Psychology Review (3): 193–209.
2. BBC Online Network, 1999. Business: The Company File Bitter Taste of Airline Feud [online]. London: BBC Online Network. Available at: < http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_company_file/394647.stm> [last accessed 01/03/03].
3. Berg T. (2001) Confronting Evil on the Internet: The Challenge of Taming the Electronic Frontier. America 18–25 (June): 15–19.
4. Bocij P. (2002) ‘Corporate Cyberstalking: An Invitation to Build Theory.’ In First Monday 7(11) [online]. Available: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_11/bocij/index.html [last accessed 06/10/03].
5. Bocij P. Chaffey D. Greasley A. et al. (2002) Business Information Systems: Technology, Development and Management for the E-Business. 2nd edn. London: Financial Times and Prentice Hall.
6. Bocij P. McFarlane L. (2002) ‘On-line Harassment: Towards a Definition of Cyberstalking’ Prison Service Journal (139): 31–8.
7. Bocij P. McFarlane L. (2003) ‘The Internet: A Discussion of Some New and Emerging Threats to Young People’ The Police Journal 76(1): 3–13
8. Bubaš G. (2001) ‘Computer Mediated Communication Theories and Phenomena: Factors that Influence Collaboration over the Internet’. Paper presented at the 3rd CARNet Users Conference, Zagreb.
9. Burgess W.A. Baker T. (2002) ‘Cyberstalking’. In Boon J. Sheridan L. (eds), Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives for Prevention, Policing and Treatment. London: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Deirmenjian J. (1999) ‘Stalking in Cyberspace’ Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 27(3): 407–13
11. Denning D. Baugh W. (2000) ‘Hiding Crimes in Cyberspace’. In Thomas D. Loader B. (eds), Cybercrime: Law Enforcement, Security and Surveillance in the Information Age. London: Routledge.
12. Felson M. (2002) Crime and Everyday Life. 3rd edn. California: Sage Publications.
13. Griffiths M. (2000) ‘Excessive Internet Use: Implications for Sexual Behavior’ Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 3 (4): 537–52.
14. Griffiths M. (2001) ‘Sex on the Internet: Observations and Implications for Internet Sex Addiction’ The Journal of Sex Research 38 (4): 1–10.
15. Groves P. (2001) ‘Perspective: Sick Web of Corruption’. Birmingham Post, 3 December.
16. Joinson A. (1998). ‘Causes and Implications of Disinhibited Behavior on the Internet’. In Gackenbach J. (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 43–60.
17. Kiesler S. Siegal J. McGuire T. (1984) ‘Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication’ American Psychologist 39(1): 123–34
18. Lea M. Spears R. (1991) ‘Computer-Mediated Communication, Deindividuation and Group Decision-Making’ International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 34: 283–301.
19. McGrath M. Casey E. (2002) ‘Forensic Psychiatry and the Internet: Practical Perspectives on Sexual Predators and Obsessional Harassers in Cyberspace’ Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 30(1): 81–94
20. Mann D. Sutton M. Tuffin R. (2003) ‘The Evolution of Hate: Social Dynamics in White Racist Newsgroups’ The Internet Journal of Criminology. An online, peer-reviewed journal available at www.flashmousepublishing.com [last accessed 06/10/03].
21. Meloy R.J. (ed.) (1998) The Psychology of Stalking: Clinical and Forensic Perspectives. London: Academic Press.
22. Milgram S. (1963) ‘Behavioral Study of Obedience’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (67): 371–8.
23. Milgram S. (1965) ‘Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority’ Human Relations (65): 57–76.
24. Milgram S. (1974) Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Mullen P. Pathé M. Purcell R. (2000) Stalkers and Their Victims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ogilvie E. (2000) Cyberstalking, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 166. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
27. Pathé M. Mullen P. (1997) ‘The Impact of Stalkers on Their Victims’ British Journal of Psychiatry (170): 12–17.
28. Petherick W. (1999) Cyber-Stalking: Obsessional Pursuit and the Digital Criminal [online]. Available: http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminology/cyberstalking/index.html [last accessed 6/10/03].
29. Sheridan L. Davies G. Boon J. (2002) ‘The Course and Nature of Stalking: A Victim Perspective’ The Howard Journal 40(3): 215–34
30. Smith R. (1998) Criminal Exploitation of New Technologies. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
31. Spitzberg B. Hoobler G. (2002) ‘Cyberstalking and the Technologies of Interpersonal Terrorism’ New Media & Society 4(1): 71–92
32. Sutton M. (in the press 2003) ‘Finding the Far Right Online: An Exploratory Study of White Racialist Web Sites’. In Taylor P. Wall D. (eds), Global Deviance in the Information Age. London: Routledge.
33. Talamo A. Ligorio B. (2001) ‘Strategic Identities in Cyberspace’ CyberPsychology & Behavior 4 (1): 109–22.
34. Thomas D. Loader B. (eds) (2000) Cybercrime: Law Enforcement, Security and Surveillance in the Information Age. London: Routledge.
35. Willison R. (2001) The Unaddressed Problem of Criminal Motivation in IS Security: Expanding the Preventive Scope Through the Concept of Readying. Working Paper Series. London: London School of Economics.
36. Song F. Wu (2002) ‘Virtual Communities in a Therapeutic Age’ Society (January/February): 39–45.
37. Zimbardo P. (1969) ‘The Human Choice: Individuation, Reasons, and Order Versus Deindividuation, Impulse and Chaos’. In Arnold W.J. Levine D. (eds), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
38. Zimbardo P. (1973) ‘On the Effects of Intervention in Human Psychological Research: With Special Reference to the Stanford Prison Experiment’ Cognition (2): 243–56.