Statistical multi-object shape models

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 387-404

  Lu, Conglin ^a   Pizer, Stephen M ^a   Joshi, Sarang ^a   Jeong, Ja Yeon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Deformable model; Medial representation; Multi object shape models; Multi scale shape analysis; Statistical shape models

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

DEFORMABLE MODELS; MEDIAL REPRESENTATION; MULTI OBJECT SHAPE MODELS; MULTI-SCALE SHAPE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

EID: 34548537265     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-007-0045-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Besag, J. 1986. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J. Royal Stat. Soc B, 48(3):259-302.
2. Blum, H., and Nagel, R. 1978. Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features. Pattern Recognition, 10(3):167-180.
3. Chaney, E., Pizer, S.M., Joshi, R., Broadhurst, S., Flether, P.T., Gash, G., Han, Q., Jeong, J., Lu, C., Merck, D., Stough, J., Tracton, J., Rosenman, J., Chi, Y., and Muller, K. 2004. Automatic male pelvis segmentation from, ct images via statistically trained multi-object deformable m-rep models. In American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO).
4. Cootes, T.F., Beeston, C., Edwards, G.J., and Taylor, C.J. 1999. A unified framework for atlas matching using active appearance models. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. LNCS 1613:322-333.
5. Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., and Taylor, C.J. 1998. Active appearance models. In Fifth European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 484-498.
6. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., and Graham, J. 1995. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38-59.
7. Davatzikos, C., Xiaodong, T., and Shen, D. 2003. Hierarchical active shape models, using the wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22(3):414-423.
8. Davies, R.H., Twining, C.J., Cootes, T.F., Waterton, J.C., and Taylor, C.J. 2002. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21 (5):525-537.
9. Fletcher, P.T. andJoshi, S. 2004. Principal geodesic analysis on symmetric spaces: statistics of diffusion tensors. In ECCV 2004 Workshop on Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis (CVAMIA).
10. Fletcher, P.T., Lu, C., and Joshi, S. 2003. Statistics of shape via principal component analysis on Lie groups. In Conference on Computer-Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 95-101.
11. Fletcher, P.T., Lu, C., Pizer, S.M., and Joshi, S. 2004. Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 23(8):995-1005.
12. Gerig, G., Styner, M., Shenton, M.E., and Lieberman, J.A. 2001. Shape versus size: improved understanding of the morphology of brain structures. In Proc. MICCAI 2001, volume 2208 of Springer LNCS Springer-Verlag, pp. 24-32.
13. Goodall, C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 53(2):285-339.
14. Grenander, U. 1995. Elements of Pattern Theory. Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Grenander, U., Chow, Y., and Keenan, D.M. 1991. HANDS: A Pattern Theoretic Study of Biological Shapes. Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Han, Q., Lu, C., Liu, G., Pizer, S., Joshi, S., and Thall, A. 2004. Representing multi-figure anatomical objects. In International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Germany, pp. 1251-1254.
17. Ho, S., and Gerig, G. 2004. Profile scale-space for multi-scale image match. In C. Barillot, D. Haynor, and P. Hellier (eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Germany, pp. 176-183.
18. Jeong, J., Pizer, S., and Ray, S. 2006. Statistics on anatomic objects reflcting inter-object relations. In MICCAI Conference: Workshop on Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy, pp. 136-145.
19. Joshi, S. 1997. Large deformation diffeomorphisms and Gaussian random fields for statistical characterization of brain submanifolds. PhD thesis, Washington University.
20. Joshi, S., Pizer, S., Fletcher, P.T., Yushkevich, P., Thall, A., and Marron, J.S. 2002. Multi-scale deformable model segmentation and statistical shape analysis using medial descriptions. IEEE-TMI, 21(5).
21. Kapur, T., Beardsley, P.A., Gibson, S.F., Grimson, W.E.L., and Wells, W.M. 1998. Model based segmentation of clinical knee MRI. Model-based 3D Image Analysis workshop (in conjuction with ICCV).
22. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1987. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321-331.
23. Kelemen, A., Szekely, G., and Gerig, G. 1999. Three-dimensional model-based segmentation. IEEE-TMI, 18(10):828-839.
24. Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaum, A.R., and Zucker, S.W. 1995. Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: the components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 15:189-224.
25. Lu, C., Cao, Y., and Mumford, D. 2002. Surface evolution under curvature flows. J. Visual Communication and Image Representation, 13:65-81.
26. Lu, C., Pizer, S.M., and Joshi, S. 2003. A markov random field approach to multi-scale shape analysis. In L.D. Griffin and M. Lillholm (eds.), Scale Space Methods in Computer Vision, volume 2695 of LNCS, Springer-Verlag, pp. 416-431.
27. Mallat, S.G. 1989. Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing, 37(12):2091-2110.
28. Merck, D., Tracton, G., Pizer, S.M., and Joshi, S. A methodology for constructing geometric priors and likelihoods for deformable shape models. http://midag.unc.cs.edu/pubs/tech-rpts/Merck06_submission.pdf.
29. Pizer, S.M., Broadhurst, R., Jeong, J., Han, Q., Saboo, R., Stough, J., Tracton, G., and Chaney, E. 2006. Intra-patient anatomic statistical models for adaptive radiotherapy. In MICCAI Workshop From Statistical Atlases to Personalized Models: Understanding Complex Diseases in Populations and Individuals, pp. 43-46.
30. Pizer, S.M., Chen, J.Z., Fletcher, P.T., Fridman, Y., Fritch, D.S., Gash, A.G., Glotzer, J.M., Jiroutek, M.R., Joshi, S., Lu, C., Muller, K.E., Thall, A., Tracton, G., Yushkevich, P., and Chaney, E.L. 2003a. Deformable m-reps for 3D medical image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 55(2):85-106.
31. Pohl, K.M., Fisher, J., Kikinis, R., Grimson, W.E.L., and Wells, W.M. 2005. Shape based segmentation of anatomical structures in magnetic resonance images. International Conference on Computer Vision, LNCS 3765:489-498.
32. Pohl, K.M., Fisher, J., Levitt, J.L., Shenton, M.E., Kikinis, R., Grimson, W.E.L., and Wells, W.M. 2005. A unifying approach to registration, segmentation, and intensity correction. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted-Intervention, LNCS 3749:310-318.
33. Pizer, S.M., Fletcher, P.T., Thall, A., Styner, M., Gerig, G., and Joshi, S. 2003c. Object models in multi-scale intrinsic coordinates via m-reps. Image and Vision Computing, Special Issue, on Generative Model-based Vision, 21(1):5-15.
34. Pizer, S.M., Siddiqi, K., Szekely, G., Damon, J.N., and Zucker, S.W. 2003b Multiscale medial loci and their properties. Int. J. Computer Vision, 55(2):155-179.
35. Pizer, S.M., Jeong, J., Lu, C., Muller, K., and Joshi, S. 2005. Estimating the statistics of multi-object anatomic geometry using inter-object relationships. In O.F. Olsen, L. Florack, and A. Kuijer, (eds.), International Workshop on Deep Structure, Singularities and Computer Vision (DSSCV), volume 3753 of LNCS, Springer-Verlag, pp. 60-71.
36. Siddiqi, K., Bouix, S., Tannenbaum, A.R., and Zuker, S.W. 2002. Hamilton-Jacobi skeletons. Int. J. Computer Vision, 48(3):215-231.
37. Stough, J., Pizer, S.M., Chaney, E., and Rao, M. 2004. Clustering on image boundary regions for deformable model segmentation. In International Symposium on Biomedical. Imaging (ISBI), Piscataway, NJ, pp. 436-439.
38. Styner, M., and Gerig, G. 2001. IPMI '01, volume 2082 of LNCS, chapter Medial models incorporating object variability for 3D shape analysis, Springer, pp. 502-516.
39. Thall, A. 2004. Deformable Solid Modeling via Medial Sampling and Displacement Subdivision. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
40. Tsai, A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Grimson, E., and Willsky, A. 2003. Coupled multi-shape model and mutual information for medical image segmentation. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. LNCS 2732:185-197.
41. Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Grimson, E., and Willsky, A. 2003. A shape-based approach to curve evolution for segmentation of medical imagery. IEEE T-MI, 22(2):137-154.
42. Unser, M. 1996. A review of wavelets in biomedical applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 84(4):626-638.
43. Vaillant, M. and Davatizikos, C. 1999. Hierarchical matching of cortical features for deformable brain image registration. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, LNCS 1613:182-195.
44. Yushkevich, P., Pizer, S.M., Joshi, S., and Marron, J.S. 2001. Intuitive, localized analysis of shape variability. In M.F. Insana and R.M. Leahy (eds.), Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), pp. 402-408.
45. Zhu, S.C. 1999. Embedding Gestalt laws in the Markov random, fields - a theory for shape modeling and perceptual organization. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 21(11).