Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: Outcome assessment

American Surgeon

Volumn 73, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 733-736

  Goldstein, Scott D ^a   Meslin, Keith P ^a   Mazza, Thomas ^b   Isenberg, Gerald A ^a   Fitzgerald, James ^a   Richards, Andrew ^b   Delong, Brian ^b   Sollenberger, Larry ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Pinnacle Health System   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FECES IMPACTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECTUM SURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEDATION; STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; STENOSIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TISSUE INJURY; TRAINING; URINE RETENTION; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548529097     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Longo A. Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease by Reduction of Mucosa and Hemorrhoidal Prolapse with a Circular Suturing Devise: A New Procedure. Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy. Bologna: Monduzzi Publishing, 1998, pp. 777-84.
2. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:687-94.
3. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and one year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1824-36.
4. Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 2005;242:29-35.
5. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Sholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1837-45.
6. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, et al. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006;93:226-30.
7. MacRae H, McLeod R. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:687-94.
8. Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: Randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782-5. 9. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:669-74.
9. Cheetham MJ. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:491-7.
10. Maw A, Eu K, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:826-8.
11. Wong L, Jiang J, Chang S, Lin J. Rectal perforation: A life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:116-7.
12. Zaheer S, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup D. Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:696-704.