Characteristics associated with emergency contraception use by family planning patients: A prospective cohort study

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 158-166

  Whittaker, Paul G ^a   Berger, Matthew ^a   Armstrong, Kay A ^a   Felice, Toni L ^b   Adams, Janet ^b  

^a Family Planning Council   (United States)

^b Adagio Health Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; POLICY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; ATTITUDE; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRACEPTION, POSTCOITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34548525751     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/3915807     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Raine TR et al., Emergency contraception: advance provision in a young, high-risk clinic population, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000, 96 (1 1 7.
2. Jackson RA et al., Advance supply of emergency contraception: effects on use and usual contraception - a randomized trial, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003, 102 (1 8 16.
3. Gold MA et al., The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women's sexual and contraceptive behavior, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 2004, 17 (2 87 96.
4. Raine TR et al., Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial, Journal of the American Medical Association, 2005, 293 (1 54 62.
5. Walsh TL and Frezieres RG, Patterns of emergency contraception use by age and ethnicity from a randomized trial comparing advance provision and information only, Contraception, 2006, 74 (2 110 117.
6. Glasier M and Baird D, The effects of self-administering emergency contraception, New England Journal of Medicine, 1998, 339 (1 1 4.
7. Lo SS et al., Effect of advanced provision of emergency contraception on women's contraceptive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial, Human Reproduction, 2004, 19 (10 2404 2410.
8. Hu X et al., Advanced provision of emergency contraception to postnatal women in China makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial, Contraception, 2005, 72 (2 111 116.
9. Bush T, Beyond HERS: some (not so) random thoughts on randomized clinical trials, International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine, 2001, 46 (2 55 59.
10. Bandura A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1986.
11. Larson R and Csikszentmihaly M, The experience sampling method, in : Reis HT, ed., Naturalistic Approaches to Studying Social Interaction. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1983, No. 15, pp. 41 56.
12. Diggle PJ, Liang KY and Zeger SL, Analysis of Longitudinal Data, Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press, 1994.
13. Fitzmaurice G, Laird N and Ware J, Applied Longitudinal Analysis, New York : Wiley, 2004.
14. Little RJA and Rubin DB, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, second ed., New York : Wiley, 2002.
15. Twisk JWR, Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology: A Practical Guide, New York : Cambridge University Press, 2003.
16. Glasier A et al., Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates, Contraception, 2004, 69 (5 361 366.
17. Harper CC et al., The effect of increased access to emergency contraception among young adolescents, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005, 106 (3 483 491.
18. Jones RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK, Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002, 34 (6 294 303.