Industrial policy in the United States

Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 147-167

  Ketels, Christian H M ^a,b  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Industrial policy; Microeconomic business environment; Regional clusters

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548515289     PISSN: 15661679     EISSN: 15737012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10842-007-0017-7     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Electronics Association, Attracting the Best and Brightest to the United States: Reforming High-Skilled Visa Policy, AeA Competitiveness Series Report. American Electronics Association: Washington, DC, 2006.
2. Association of American Universities AAU, National Defense Education and Innovation Initiative: Meeting America's Economic and Security Challenges in the 21st Century. Association of American Universities: Washington, DC, 2006.
3. Biotechnology Industry Association BIO, Growing the Nation's Bioscience Sector: State Bioscience Initiatives 2006, Prepared by the Battelle Technology Partnership Practice and SSTI. Biotechnology Industry Association: Washington, DC, 2006.
4. Braunerhjelm, P., Faini, R., Norman, V., Ruane, F., and Seabright, P., Integration and the Regions of Europe: How the Right Policies can Prevent Polarization. CEPR: London, 2000.
5. Broad, W.J., U.S. is Losing Its Dominance in the Sciences. New York Times, 2004, May 3.
6. Business Roundtable, Tapping America's Potential. Business Roundtable: Washington, DC, 2005.
7. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Future. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine: Washington, DC, 2006.
8. Council on Competitiveness, Innovate America-National Innovation Initiative Report. Council on Competitiveness: Washington, DC, 2004.
9. Council on Competitiveness, Competitiveness Index 2006: Where America Stands. Council on Competitiveness: Washington, DC, 2006.
10. Council on Competitiveness, M. E. Porter, Monitor Company, Cluster of Innovation-Initiative: San Diego. Council on Competitiveness: Washington, DC, 2001.
11. Curtis, M.R., The Innovation of Energy Technologies and the US National Innovation System-The Case of the Advanced Turbine System. U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2003.
12. Destler, I.M., American Trade Politics, 4th edition. Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC, 2005.
13. Domestic Policy Council/Office of Science and Technology Policy, American Competitiveness Initiative. Domestic Policy Council/Office of Science and Technology: The White House, Washington, DC, 2006.
14. Drabenstott, M., A Review of the Federal Role in Regional Economic Development. Center for the Study of Rural America, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2005.
15. Fong, G.R., Breaking New Grounds or Breaking the Rules, in International Security, vol. 25, no.2, pp. 152-186, 2000 (Fall).
16. Gadzey, A., Thompson, H., and Yeboah, O., Industrial Subsidies in Alabama: Economic Impact Across Counties, in Southern Business & Economics Journal, 2007 (in press).
17. General Accounting Office, Community Development: Federal Revitalization Programs are Being Implemented, but Data on the Use of Tax Benefits are Limited, GAO-04-306. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC, 2004.
18. General Accounting Office, Federal Research: Observations on the Small Business Innovation Research Program, GAO-05-861T. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC, 2005a.
19. General Accounting Office, Advanced Technology Program: Inherent Factors in Selection Process are Likely to Limit Identification of Similar Research, GAO-05-759T. General Accounting Office: Washington, DC, 2005b.
20. Graham, E. and Marchick, D., US National Security and Foreign Direct Investment. Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC, 2006.
21. Gresser, E., Weinstein, P., and Marshall, W., Raising our Game: A National Competition Strategy, The 2006 Progressive Policy Institute report. Progressive Policy Institute: Washington, DC, 2006.
22. Gurbaxani, I., Industriepolitik in den Vereinigten Staaten. Nomos Verlag: Baden-Baden, 2000.
23. Hill, C., "Developments in the Federal Science and Technology Policies in the United States," in Shapira, P., Kuhlmann, S. (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation-Experiences from the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar: Chatenham, 2003.
24. Hill, K., Universities in the U.S. National Innovation System Productivity and Prosperity Project, Tempe, 2006.
25. Hufbauer, G.C., The Foreign Sales Corporation Drama: Reaching the Last Act? IIE International Economics Policy Briefs. Intitute of International Economics: Washington, DC, 2002.
26. Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness (ISC), Cluster Mapping Project, database available at www.isc.hbs.edu/cmp accessed 10 December 2006.
27. Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J., Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2004.
28. Ketels, C., Mobilizing the Economic Potential of Science - A Comparison Between Germany and the United States. Humboldt Institution for Transatlantic Issues: Berlin, 2004.
29. Ketels, C. and Sölvell, Ö., Clusters in the 10 New EU Member Countries. European Commission-DG Enterprise and Industry: Brussels, 2006.
30. Krugman, P., Geography and Trade. MIT Press: Cambridge, 1991.
31. Lindqvist, G., Sölvell, Ö, and Ketels, C., The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Ivory Tower AB: Stockholm, 2003.
32. Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., Overman, H.G., Redding, S.J., and Venables, A.J., The Location of European Industry, Economic Papers Number 142. European Commission-DG Economic and Financial Affairs: Brussels, 2000.
33. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), 2005 State Expenditure Report, NASBO: Washington, D.C., 2006.
34. National Governors Association, Center for Best Practices, Enhancing Competitiveness: A Review of Recent State Economic Development Initiatives. National Governors Association: Washington, DC, 2005.
35. National Science Board, Fulfilling the Promise. National Science Board: Washington, DC, 2003.
36. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. National Science Foundation: Arlington, 2006.
37. OECD, Policies for Industrial Development and Competitiveness. Working Paper DSTI/IND(97)28/FINAL. OECD: Paris, 1998.
38. OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002-Country Response to Policy Questionnaire, United States. OECD: Paris, 2002a.
39. OECD, Small and Medium Enterprise Outlook. OECD: Paris, 2002b.
40. OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2004. OECD: Paris, 2004a.
41. OECD, Recent Tax Policy Trends and Reforms in OECD Countries-No. 9. OECD: Paris, 2004b.
42. OECD, Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook, OECD: Paris, 2006.
43. Paytas, J., Gradeck, R., and Andrews, L., Universities and the Development of Industry Clusters, Prepared for the Economic Development Administration (EDA). US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2004.
44. Porter, M.E., The Economic Performance of Regions, Regional Studies, vol. 37, nos. 6 & 7, pp. 549-578, 2003 (August/October).
45. Porter, M.E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press: New York, 1990.
46. Porter, M.E, Ketels, C., Miller, K., and Bryden, R., Competitiveness in Rural U.S. Regions: Learning and Research Agenda, Prepared for the Economic Development Administration (EDA). US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2004 (April).
47. Porter, M.E., Delgado, M., and Ketels, C., The Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index, in World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report, Palgrave MacMillan, 2006 (September).
48. Quillen, C., Innovation and Standards for Patentability, in FTC/DOJ Hearings on Competition and Intellectual Property Law in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC, 2002 (July).
49. Schott, J., Free Trade Agreements: US Policies and Priorities. Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC, 2004 (April).
50. Shapira, P., "Evaluating Manufacturing Extension Services in the United States", in P. Shapira, S. Kuhlmann (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation - Experiences from the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar: Chatenham, 2003.
51. Shapira, P., "Systems for Supporting Small Business in the United States: Insights and Challenges from State Programs in Georgia", in N. Kojima (ed.), Supporting Systems for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the United States. Japan Institute of Labour: Tokyo, 2001.
52. Strengthening Americas Communities Advisory Committee (SACAC), Report Submitted to Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierez. SACAC: Washington, DC, 2005 (July).
53. Task Force on the Future of American Innovation, Benchmarks of our Innovation Future, Task Force on the Future of American Innovation: Washington, D.C., 2006.
54. U.S. Department of Commerce, Manufacturing in America. U.S. Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2004 (January).
55. Ward, A., US states become addicted to use of economic sweeteners. Financial Times, 2006 (23 March).
56. White House, A New Generation of American Innovation. White House: Washington, DC, 2004 (April).
57. White House Office of Management and Budget, President Bush Proposes Strengthening America's Communities Initiative. White House Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2005a (3 February).
58. White House Office of Management and Budget, FY 2006 Budget Priorities, White House Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2005b (January).
59. White House Office of Management and Budget, Overview of the President's 2006 Budget. White House Office of Management and Budget: Washington, DC, 2005c.
60. World Trade Organization, Trade Policy Review United States. World Trade Organization: Geneva, 2006.