|
Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 891-896
|
The value of imaging techniques for bone metastases;Wertigkeit bildgebender verfahren bei ossären metastasen
|
Author keywords
Course evaluation; Metastases search; Primary diagnosis; Prostate carcinoma; Renal carcinoma
|
Indexed keywords
CHOLINE;
CHOLINE C 11;
CHOLINE DERIVATIVE;
FLUORIDE SODIUM;
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;
FLUOROETHYLCHOLINE F 18;
SODIUM FLUORIDE F 18;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ARTICLE;
BONE ATROPHY;
BONE METASTASIS;
BONE RADIOGRAPHY;
BONE SCINTISCANNING;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER RECURRENCE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
GOLD STANDARD;
HUMAN;
KIDNEY CARCINOMA;
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
OSTEOBLAST;
OSTEOLYSIS;
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PROSTATE CARCINOMA;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
WHOLE BODY SCINTISCANNING;
BONE AND BONES;
BONE NEOPLASMS;
CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY NEOPLASMS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;
RADIOGRAPHY;
RADIONUCLIDE IMAGING;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SPINAL NEOPLASMS;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 34548513263
PISSN: 03402592
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-007-1520-5 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (18)
|