A reanalysis of apparent survival rates of Indiana myotis (Myotis sodalis)

Acta Chiropterologica

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 127-132

  Boyles, Justin G ^a   Walters, Brianne L ^a   Whitaker Jr , John O ^a   Cope, James B ^b  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EARLHAM COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cormack Jolly Seber model; Demography; Myotis sodalis; Survival

Indexed keywords

BAT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; MODELING; POPULATION ESTIMATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SURVIVAL;

MYOTIS; MYOTIS SODALIS;

EID: 34548513066     PISSN: 15081109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2007)9[127:AROASR]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pp. 267-281, in Second International Symposium on Information Theory (B. N. PETROV and F. CSAKI, eds.). Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
2. BLATCHLEY, W. S. 1899. Gleanings from nature: ten Indiana caves and the animals which inhabit them. Indiana Karst Conservancy, Myotis Press, Special Publications, 4: 1-71.
3. BURNHAM, K. P., D. R. ANDERSON, G. C. WHITE, C. BROWNIE, and K. H. POLLOCK. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society Monographs, 5: 1-437.
4. CLAWSON, R. L. 2002. Trends in population size and current status. Pp. 2-8, in The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species (A. KURTA and J. KENNEDY, eds.). Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, 253 pp.
5. CONVERSE, S. J., J. B. IVERSON, and J. A. SAVIDGE. 2005. Demographics of an ornate box turtle population experiencing minimal human-induced disturbances. Ecological Applications, 15: 2171-2179.
6. CORMACK, R. M. 1964. Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika, 51: 429-438.
7. HOVEY, H. C. 1880. Eight miles in Indiana caverns. Scribner's Monthly, 19: 875-877.
8. HUMPHREY, S. R., and J. B. COPE. 1976. Population ecology of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) in Indiana and north-central Kentucky. American Society of Mammalogists, Special Publications, 4: 1-81.
9. HUMPHREY, S. R., and J. B. COPE. 1977. Survival rates of the endangered Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis. Journal of Mammalogy, 58: 32-36.
10. JOLLY, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika, 52: 225-247.
11. KURTA, A., and J. KENNEDY (eds.). 2002. The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, 253 pp.
12. LEBRETON, J. D., K. P. BURNHAM, J. CLOBERT, and D. R. ANDERSON. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62: 67-118.
13. RICHTER, A. R., S. R. HUMPHREY, J. B. COPE, and V. BRACK, JR. 1993. Modified cave entrances: thermal effect on body mass and resulting decline of endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Conservation Biology, 7: 407-415
14. SEBER, G. A. 1965. A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika, 52: 249-259.
15. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1999. Agency draft Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) revised recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota, 53 pp.
16. WHITAKER, J. O., JR., J. B. COPE, and V. BRACK, JR. 2003. Bats of Wyandotte Cave, Crawford County, Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 112: 75-84.
17. WHITE, G. C., and K. P. BURNHAM. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46 (Supplement): 120-138.