The efficacy of narrative video for raising awareness in ICT designers about older users' requirements

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 19, Issue 5-6, 2007, Pages 587-596

  Carmichael, A ^a   Newell, A F ^a   Morgan, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Film video; Inclusive design; Interface design; Older people; User requirements

Indexed keywords

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER INTERFACES;

ICT INTERFACES; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; INTERFACE DESIGNERS; NARRATIVE VIDEO;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 34548502710     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Blomberg, J., Burrell, M., Guest, G., 2002. An ethnographic approach to design. In: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 964-986.
2. Boal A. The Rainbow of Desire (1995), Routledge, London
3. Bodker, S., Ehn, P., Sjogren, D., Sundblad, Y., 2000. Co-operative design - perspectives on 20 years with 'the Scandinavian IT model. Report for CID (CID-104) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockhom, Sweden, ISSN 1403-073X.
4. Benyon D., and Macaulay C. Scenarios and the HCI-SE design problem. Interacting With Computers 14 (2002) 397-405
5. Carmichael, A., 1999. Style Guide for the Design of Interactive Television Services for Elderly Viewers, Independent Television Commission, Winchester. .
6. Carroll J. Scenario-based design. In: Helander M., et al. (Ed). Handbook of Computer Interaction (1997), Elsevier Science B.V.
7. Charness N., and Bosman E. Human factors and design for older adults. In: Birren J., and Schaie K. (Eds). Handbook of the Psychology of Aging 2 (1990), Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA 446-463
8. Cooper A. The Inmates are Running the Asylum (1999), Macmillan, USA
9. Coyne K., and Nielsen J. Web Usability for Senior Citizens (2002), Nielsen/Norman Group
10. Czaja S., and Lee C. Designing computer systems for older adults. In: Jacko J., and Sears A. (Eds). The Human-Computer Handbook: Fundamentals Evolving, Technologies and Emerging Applications (2003), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 413-427
11. Danowski J., and Sacks W. Computer communication and the elderly. Experimental Aging Research 6 2 (1980) 125-135
12. Diaper D., and Worman L. Two falls out of three in the automated accessibility assessment of World Wide Web Sites: A-Prompt v. Bobby. In: Johnson P., and Palanque P. (Eds). People and Computers XVII (2003), Springer-Verlag
13. Dickinson, A., Eisma, R., Syme, A., Gregor, P., 2002. UTOPIA: Usable technology for older people: Inclusive and appropriate. In: Brewster, S., Zajicek, M. (Eds.), A New Research Agenda for Older Adults, Proc. BCS HCI, London, pp. 38-39.
14. Dishman E. Designing for the New World. In: Laurel B. (Ed). Design Research (2003), MIT Press 41-48
15. Docampo-Rama M., de Ridder H., and Bouma H. Technology generation and age in using layered user interfaces. Gerontechnology 1 1 (2001) 25-40
16. Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Mival, O., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., 2003. Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people, Include 2003, London, pp. 7:252-7:259.
17. Eisma R., Dickinson A., Goodman J., Syme A., Tiwari L., and Newell A. Early user involvement in the development of Information Technology-related products for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society 3/2 (2004) 131-140
18. Fozard J. Vision and hearing in aging. In: Birren J.E., and Schaie K.W. (Eds). Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (1990), Academic Press, London 150-170
19. Gregor, P., Newell, A., 2001. Designing for dynamic diversity - making accessible interfaces for older people. In: Jorge, J., Heller, R., Guedj, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, A.C.M, pp. 90-92.
20. Gregor P., Sloan D., and Newell A. Disability and technology: building barriers or creating opportunities. In: Zelkowitz M. (Ed). Advances in Computers (2005), Elsevier, Academic Press 284-346
21. Hawthorn D. Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting With Computers 12 5 (2000) 507-528
22. Hawthorn, D., 2002. Issues related to application complexity when designing for older users, SIGCHI-NZ Symposium, Palmerston North.
23. Keates, S., Lebbon, C., Clarkson, P., 2000. Investigating industry attitudes to universal design. In: RESNA 2000. Orlando, USA, pp. 276-278.
24. Kelly, B., 2002. WebWatch: An Accessibility Analysis of UK University Entry Points, Ariadne, Issue 33. .
25. Kelly P.L., and Kroemer K.H.E. Anthropometry of the elderly: status and recommendations. Human Factors 32 5 (1990) 571-595
26. McKenna, S., Marquis-Faulkes, F., Newell, A., Gregor, P., 2003. Scenario-based drama as a tool for investigating user requirements with application to home monitoring for elderly people. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Crete.
27. Mitchell V., Nicolle C., Maguire M., and Boyle H. Web-based interactive TV services for older users. Gerontechnology 6 1 (2007) 20-32
28. Newell A., Carmichael A., Morgan M., and Dickinson A. The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interacting with Computers 18 5 (2006) 996-1011
29. Newell A., Dickinson A., Smith M., and Gregor P. Designing a portal for older users: A case study of an Industrial/Academic Collaboration. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13 3 (2006) 347-375
30. Newell A., and Gregor P. Human computer interfaces for people with disabilities. In: Helander M. (Ed). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (1997), Elsevier Science 813-824
31. Newell A., and Gregor P. Extra-ordinary human-machine interaction: what can be learned from people with disabilities?. Cognition Technology and Work 1 2 (1999) 78-85
32. Newell, A,. Gregor, P., 2000. User sensitive inclusive design. In: Scholtz, J., Thomas, J. (Eds.), CUU 2000 First ACM Conference on Universal Usability 39-44.
33. Office of the e-Envoy, 2002a. Guidelines for UK Government websites: Illustrated handbook for web management teams (May 2002), see; .
34. Office of the e-Envoy, 2002b. Guidelines for UK government websites: Framework for local government (August 2002), see; .
35. Office of the e-Envoy, 2002c. Government Metadata Standard (April 2002), see; .
36. Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., 2004. The Disability Rights Commission Formal Investigation into Web Site Accessibility. In: Dearden, A., Watts, L. (Eds.), Proceedings HCI 2004: Design For Life (Leeds, UK), pp. 157-158.
37. Rabbitt P., and Carmichael A. Designing communications and information-handling systems for disabled and elderly users. In: Snel J., and Cremer R. (Eds). Work and Aging: A European Perspective (1994), Taylor and Francis Ltd., London 173-195
38. Robey D., and Markus M. Beyond rigor and relevance: producing consumable research about information systems. Information Resources Management Journal 11 (1998) 7-15
39. Sloan, D., Gregor, P., Booth, P., Gibson, L., 2002. Auditing Accessibility of UK Higher Education Web sites. In: Novick, D., Scholtz, J. (Eds), Interacting with Computers, vol. 14 (4), Elsevier Science, pp. 313-325.
40. Thatcher, J., 2003, Web Accessibility - What not to do. .
41. Williamson, K., Bow, A., Wale, K., 1997. Older People and the Internet, Link-Up, March, pp. 9-12. .
42. World Wide Web Consortium, 1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, (May 1999). .
43. World Wide Web Consortium, 1998,.Cascading Style Sheets, level 2, (May 1998). .
44. Zajicek, M., 2004. Successful and available: Interface design exemplars for older users. Interacting with Computers, vol. 16, Elsevier Science, pp. 411-430.
45. Zajicek M. Older adults: Key factors in design. In: Perhonen A., et al. (Ed). Future Interaction Design (2005), Springer Verlag, London 151-176