The differential performance effects of healthcare information technology adoption

Information Systems Management

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 5-14

  Bhattacherjee, Anol ^a,d   Hikmet, Neset ^b   Menachemi, Nir ^c   Kayhan, Varol O ^a   Brooks, Robert G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA SARASOTA MANATEE   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Enterprise systems; Healthcare information technology; Hospital performance; IT adoption; IT investments

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE SYSTEM; HEALTHCARE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE; IT ADOPTION; IT INVESTMENTS;

HEALTH CARE; HOSPITALS; INVESTMENTS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34548490724     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530601036778     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barney, J. (1992). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
2. Bates, D.W., Leape, L.L., Cullen, D.J., Laird, N., Peterson, L.A., & Teich, J.M. (1998). Effect of computerized physician order entry and team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. Journal of American Medical Association, 280(15), 1311-1316.
3. Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196.
4. Brooks, R., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., & Clawson, A. (2005). Patient safety-related information technology utilization in urban and rural hospitals. Journal of Medical Systems, 29(2), 103-109.
5. Burke, D., & Menachemi, N. (2004). Opening the black box: Measuring hospital information technology capability. Health Care Management Review, 29(3), 207-217.
6. Burke, D., Wang, B., Wan, T., & Diana, M. (2002). Exploring hospitals' adoption of information technology. Journal of Medical Systems, 26(4), 349-355.
7. Calico, F. W., Dillard, C. D., Moscovice, I., & Wakefield, M. K. (2003). A framework and action agenda for quality improvement in rural health care. Journal of Rural Health, 19(3), 226-232.
8. Chin, T. (2004). Technology valued, but implementing it into practice is slow. Retrieved January 12, 2006, from American Medical News Web site: http://www.amednews.com
9. Center for Medicare and Medicade Services (CMS) (2002). Health Care Industry Market Update. Retrieved April 29, 2002, from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ CapMarketUpdates/Downloads/hcimu42902.pdf
10. st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273-289.
12. Dorenfest, S. (2000). The decade of the '90s. Poor use of IT investments contributes to growing healthcare crisis. Healthcare Informatics, 17(8), 64-67.
13. Evans, R. S., Pestotnik, S. L., Classen, D. C., Clemmar, T. P., Weaver, L. K., & Orme, J. F. (1998). A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other anti-infective agents. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 232-238.
14. First Consulting Group (2003). Advanced technologies to lower health care costs and improve quality. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
15. Freudenheim, M. (2004). Many hospitals resist computerized patient care. New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2006 from: http://www.nytimes.com/ 2004/04/06/technology/06errors.html
16. Health Information and Management Systems Society (2002). 14th Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey. Superior Consulting Group, Chicago, Illinois.
17. Horwitt, E. (1993). Wal-Mart spotlights fast LAN's. Computerworld, 27(4), 16.
18. Hunt, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Hanna, S. E., & Smith, K. (1998). Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. Journal of American Medical Association, 280, 1339-1345.
19. Keen, P. G. W. (1992). Get a handle on IT. Modern Office Technology, 37(6), 14-15.
20. Kramer, T., Tillinghast, A, & Marge, R. (1999). ROI for an electronic medical record. Behavioral Health Management, 19(1), 28-31.
21. Mekhjian, H. S., Kumar, R. R., Kuehn, L., Bentley, T. D., Teater, P., Thomas, A., Payne, B., & Ahmad, A. (2002). Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 9(5), 529-539.
22. Menachemi, N., Burkhardt, J., Shewchuk, R., Burke, D., & Brooks, R. (2006). Hospital information technology and positive financial performance: A different approach to ROI. Journal of Healthcare Management, 51(1), 263-268.
23. Mitchell, E., & Sullivan, F. (2001). A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: Systemic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1989-97. British Medical Journal, 322(7281), 279-282.
24. Pare, G., & Sicotte, C. (2001). Information technology sophistication in health care: An instrument validation study among Canadian hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 63(3), 205-223.
25. Rodger, J. A., Pendharkar, P., & Paper, D. J. (1999). Management of Information technology and quality performance in health care facilities. International Journal of Applied Quality Management, 2(2), 251-269.
26. Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Developing longterm competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31-45.
27. Smith, C., Cowan, C., Heffler, S., & Catlin, A. (2006). National health spending in 2004: Recent slowdown led by prescription drug spending. Health Affairs, 25(1), 186-196.
28. Smith, H., Bullers, W., & Piland, N. (2000). Does information technology make a difference in healthcare organization performance? A multiyear study. Hospital Topics, 78(2), 13-22.
29. Wang, S. J., Middelton, B., Prasser, L. A., Bardon, C. G., Spurr, C. D., Carchidi, C. J., Kittler, A. F., Goldszer, R. C., Fairchild, D. C., Sussman, A. J., Kuperman, G. J., & Bates, D. W. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397-403.