Symptom Management for Cancer Patients: A Trial Comparing Two Multimodal Interventions

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 253-264

  Sikorskii, Alla ^a   Given, Charles W ^a   Given, Barbara ^a   Jeon, Sangchoon ^a   Decker, Veronica ^a   Decker, David ^a   Champion, Victoria ^a   McCorkle, Ruth ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

automated telephone systems; nurse administered system; Randomized clinical trial; symptom severity

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ALLOPATHY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED TELEPHONE SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PALLIATIVE THERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTION STUDY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSE ASSISTED SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZATION; RASCH ANALYSIS; SOLID TUMOR; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AGED; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; AUTOMATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; NURSING CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TELEPHONE;

EID: 34548484782     PISSN: 08853924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kroenke K. Studying symptoms: sampling and measurement issues. Ann Intern Med 134 (2001) 844-853
2. Cleeland C., Mendoza T., Wang X., et al. Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients. Cancer 89 (2000) 634-1646
3. Portenoy R.K., Thaler H.T., Kornblith A.B., et al. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer 30A (1994) 1326-1336
4. Bruera E., Kuehn N., Miller M., Selmser P., and Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7 (1991) 6-9
5. De Hayes J., van Knippenberg F., and Neijt J. Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam symptom checklist. Br J Cancer 62 (1990) 1034-1038
6. McCorkle R., and Benoliel J. Symptom distress, current concerns, and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life threatening disease. Soc Sci Med 17 (1983) 431-438
7. Paice J. Assessment of symptom clusters in people with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 32 (2004) 98-102
8. Dodd M., Miaskowski C., and Lee K. Occurrence of symptom clusters. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 32 (2004) 76-78
9. Shacham S., Reinhardt L., Raubertas R.F., and Cleeland C.S. Emotional states and pain: intraindividual and interindividual measures of association. J Behav Med 6 4 (1983) 405-419
10. National Institutes of Health. Symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue. State of the Science Conference Statement, NCI; 2002.
11. Miaskowski C., and Lee K. Pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances in oncology outpatients receiving radiation therapy for bone metastasis: a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage 17 5 (1999) 320-332
12. Cooley M., Short T., and Moriarty H. Symptom prevalence, distress, and change over time in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer. Psychooncology 12 7 (2003) 694-708
13. Given C., Given B., Azzouz F., Kozachik S., and Stommel M. Predictors of pain and fatigue in the year following diagnosis in elderly patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 21 6 (2001) 456-466
14. Given C., Given B., Rahbar M., et al. Effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on reducing symptom severity during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22 3 (2004) 507-516
15. Dobson K., and Dozios D. Historical and philosophical bases of the cognitive behavioral therapy. Handbook of cognitive behavioral therapies (2001), Guilford Press, New York 3-39
16. McGinn L., and Sanderson W. What allows cognitive behavioral therapy to be brief: overview, efficacy and crucial factors facilitating brief treatment. Psychol Sci Pract 8 (2001) 23-73
17. Hazlett-Stevens H., and Craske M. In: Bond F.W., and Dryden W. (Eds). Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy: Definition and scientific foundations in handbook of brief cognitive behavior therapy (2002), John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York 1-20
18. Jacobsen P.B., Meade C.D., Stein K.D., et al. Efficacy and costs of two forms of stress management training for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 20 12 (2002) 2851-2862
19. Yates P., Aranda S., and Hargraves M. Randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention for managing fatigue in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 6027-6036
20. Meyer T., and Mark M. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol 14 (1995) 101-108
21. Mooney K., Beck S., Friedman R., and Ramesh F. Telephone-linked care for cancer symptom monitoring. Cancer Pract 10 (2002) 147-154
22. Balas E.A., Jaffrey F., Kuperman G., et al. Electronic communication with patients. JAMA 278 (1997) 152-159
23. Searles J., Perrine M., Mundt J., and Helzer J. Self-report of drinking using touch-tone telephone: extending the limits of reliable daily contact. J Stud Alcohol 56 (1995) 375-382
24. Kobak K.A., Taylor L.V., Dottle S.L., et al. A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. JAMA 278 (1997) 905-910
25. Piette J. Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. Am J Manag Care 6 (2000) 817-827
26. Piette J., Weinberger M., and McPhee S. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care (a randomized controlled trial). Med Care 38 (2000) 218-223
27. Naylor M.R., Naud J.E., and Keefe F.J. Automated telephone as an adjunct for the treatment of chronic pain: a pilot study. J Pain 3 (2002) 429-438
28. Taves D.R. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther 15 (1974) 443-453
29. Katz J.N., Chang L.C., Sangha O., Fossel A., and Bates D. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review?. Med Care 34 (1996) 73-84
30. Sackett D., and Gent M. Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 301 (1979) 1410-1412
31. SAS software. Version 9 of the SAS system for windows. Copyright 2002-2003 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
32. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (1960), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
33. Cella D., Dineen K., Arnason B., et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology 47 (1996) 129-139
34. Raczek A., Ware J., Bjorner J., et al. Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998) 1203-1214
35. Bjorner J., Petersen M., Groenvold M., et al. Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Qual Life Res 13 (2004) 1683-1697
36. Chan K., Orlando M., Ghosh-Dastidar B., Duan N., and Sherbourne C.D. The interview mode effect on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: an item response theory analysis. Med Care 42 3 (2004) 281-289
37. Linacre J.M., and Wright B.D. A user's guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch model computer program (2000), MESA Press, Chicago, IL
38. Wright B., Linacre J., Gustafson J.E., et al. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 8 (1994) 370
39. Searle S.R., Speed F.M., and Miliken G.A. Population marginal means in the linear model: an alternative to least squares means. Am Stat 34 4 (1980) 216-221
40. Liang K.Y., and Zeger S.L. An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Stat Med 11 (1992) 1825-1839
41. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (1988), Lawrence Erlhbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ