A theory of necessity

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1987, Pages 339-368

  Brudner, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548483790     PISSN: 01436503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ojls/7.3.339     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (1980), pp 308–320.
2. Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part (1961), pp 728–31.
3. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (1978), pp 807–10.
4. Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part (1961), pp 728–31.
5. Williams, ‘The Defence of Necessity’, [1953] Current Legal Problems, 216.
6. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (1978), pp 788–98.
7. Robinson, ‘A Theory of Justification: Social Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability’, (1975), 23 UCLA L Rev 266.
8. Conde, ‘Necessity Defined: A New Role in the Criminal Defence System’, (1981), 29 UCLA L Rev 409.
9. Fletcher, ‘The Individualization of Excusing Conditions’, 47 S Cal LRev 1269, 1280–88
10. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Hafner, 1970), p 323.
11. Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England (1883), II, 108.
12. Report of the Criminal Code Bill Commission, Pari Pap (1878-79), XX, pp 10, 43–44.
13. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, trans Knox (1967), para 126.
14. Gombay, ‘Necessitate Without Inclining’, (1985), XXIV Dialogue 579–87.
15. McCall, ‘Incline Without Necessitating’, (1985), XXIV Dialogue 489–96.
16. Brodeur, ‘Compelled to Choose’, (1985), XXIV Dialogue 597–603.
17. Baker, ‘Duress, Responsibility, and Deterrence’, (1985), XXIV Dialogue 605–612.
18. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, paras 10-21.
19. H. L. A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (1968), ch 2.
20. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1110a–l 110b.
21. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, para 5.
22. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, para 95.
23. Thomson, ‘The Trolley Problem’, (1985), 94 Yale L J 1395.
24. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, paras 137—40.
25. Bruce Chapman, ‘Criminal Law Liability and Fundamental Justice: Toward a Theory of Substantive Judicial Review’, (1986) 44 UT Fac L Rev 153, at 170-171.
26. Bickenbach, ‘The Defence of Necessity’, (1983), 13 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 79, at 86.
27. Kant, Ethical Philosophy, trans Ellington (1983), pp 38–9.
28. Kant, Foundations of.the Metaphysics of Morals, trans Beck (1959), pp 59.
29. Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, trans Beck (1956), pp 26–51.
30. Morgan, ‘The Defence of Necessity: Justification or Excuse’, (1984), 42 UT FacL Rev 165, at 174-5.
31. Weinrib, ‘The Case for a Duty to Rescue’, (1980), 90 Yale L J 247, at 266-7.
32. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971), pp 100–8.
33. Morris, ‘The Status of Rights’, (1981), 92 Ethics 40.
34. Melden, Rights and Persons (1977), pp 18–20.
35. Feinberg, ‘Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life’, (1978), 7 Philosophy and Public Affairs 93, at 102.
36. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, para 44.
37. Gewirth, Human Rights (1982), p 59.
38. Gur-Arye, ‘Should the Criminal Law Distinguish Between Necessity as a Justification and Necessity as an Excuse’, 102 LQ Rev 71, at 78-9.
39. Greenawalt, ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’, (1984), 84 Col LRev 1897.
40. Stuart Canadian Criminal Law (1982), p 380.
41. Howard, ‘Assaulting Policemen in the Execution of Their Duty’, (1963) 79 LQ Rev 247–265.
42. Epstein, ‘A Theory of Strict Liability’, (1973), 2 Journal of Legal Studies 151.
43. Woollerton and Wilson Ltd v Richard Costain Ltd, [1970] 1 WLR 411.
44. Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality, ed Masters (1964), pp 151–56.
45. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, para 194.