Ultrasound screening: How effective is the service?

Irish Medical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 9, 2006, Pages

  Lalor, Joan ^a   McParland, Peter ^b   Devane, Declan ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OBSTETRIC CARE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; STAFF TRAINING; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; IRELAND; MANPOWER; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; IRELAND; MEDICAL AUDIT; OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 34548476875     PISSN: 03323102     EISSN: 03323102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Peck E, Secker J. Quality criteria for qualitative research: does context make a difference? Qualitative Health Research 1999;9(4):552-558.
2. RCOG. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy. Protocol, standards and training. Supplement to the Working Party Report on Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Abnormalities (October 1997). 2000.
3. Whittle M, Honest H. Antenatal Ultrasound Screening. Ultrasound Survey of England 2002.: Commissioned by the UK National Screening Committee, 2005:1-51.
4. Lalor JG, Devane D. Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan. Midwifery 2006; In press.
5. Whittle M, Honest H. Antenatal Ultrasound Screening. Ultrasound survey of England 2002: NHS, 2005.