Housing and urban location decisions in Spain: An econometric analysis with unobserved heterogeneity

Urban Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1657-1676

  García, Javier A B ^a   Hernández, José Enrique Rodríguez ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; LOCATION DECISION; RENTAL SECTOR; TENURE SYSTEM; URBAN HOUSING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

EID: 34548460777     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00420980701426624     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barrios, J. A. (2004) Generalized sample selection under RUM. Economics Letters, 85, pp. 129-132.
2. Barrios, J. A. and Rodríguez, J. E. (2004) User cost changes, unemployment and home-ownership: Evidence from Spain. Urban Studies, 41:3, pp. 563-578.
3. Barrios, J. A. and Rodríguez, J. E. (2005) Un modelo logit multinomial mixto de tenencia de vivienda. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 13:38, pp. 5-27.
4. Börsch-Supan, A. and Pitkin, J. (1988) On discrete choice models of housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 24, pp. 153-172.
5. Börsch-Supan, A. and Pollakowski, H. O. (1990) Estimating housing consumption adjustments from panel data. Journal of Urban Economics, 27, pp. 131-150.
6. Börsch-Supan, A., Heiss, F. and Seko, M. (2001) Housing demand in Germany and Japan. Journal of Housing Economics, 10:3, pp. 229-252.
7. Bourassa, S. C. (1995) A model of housing tenure choice in Australia. Journal of Urban Economics, 37, pp. 161-175.
8. Catsiapis, G. and Robinson, C. (1982) Sample selection bias with multiple selection rules. Journal of Econometrics, 18, pp. 351-368.
9. Colom, M. C., Martínez, R. and Molés, M. C. (2002) Un análisis de las decisiones de formación de hogar, tenencia y demanda de servicios de vivienda de los jóvenes españoles. Moneda y Crédito, 215, pp. 199-223.
10. Duan, N. (1983) Smearing estimate: A nonparametric retransformation method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, pp. 605-610.
11. Dubin, J. A. and McFadden, D. L. (1984) An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica, 52, pp. 345-360.
12. Ermisch, J. (1996) The demand of housing in Britain and population ageing: Microeconometric evidence. Economica, 63, pp. 383-404.
13. Gobillon, L. and Blanc, D. Le (2002) The impact of borrowing constraints on mobility and tenure choice, CREST
14. Goodman, A. C. (1995) A dynamic equilibrium model of housing demand and mobility with transaction cost. Journal of Housing Economics, 4, pp. 307-327.
15. Goodman, A. C. (2002) Estimating equilibrium housing demand for 'stayers'. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, pp. 1-24.
16. Goodman, A. C. (2003) Following a panel of stayers: Length of stay, tenure choice and housing demand. Journal of Housing Economics, 12, pp. 106-133.
17. Goodman, A. C. and Kawai, M. (1982) Permanent income, hedonic price, and demand for housing: New evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 12, pp. 214-237.
18. Goodman, A. C. and Thibodeau, T. G. (1998) Housing market segmentation. Journal of Housing Economics, 7, pp. 121-143.
19. Greene, W. H. (2000) Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
20. Hajivassiliou, V. and Ruud, P. (1994) Classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation. Handbook of Econometrics, pp. 2383-2441. Elsevier, New York
21. Heckman, J. J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47:1, pp. 153-161.
22. Henderson, J. V. and Ioannides, Y. M. (1983) A model of housing tenure choice. American Economic Review, 73:1, pp. 98-113.
23. Hensher, D. A. (2001) The sensitivity of the valuation of travel time savings to the specification of unobserved effects. Transportation Research Part E, 37, pp. 129-142.
24. Hensher, D. A. (2001) The valuation of commuter travel time savings for car drivers: Evaluating alternative model specifications. Transportation, 28, pp. 101-118.
25. Ioannides, Y. M. and Kan, K. (1996) Structural estimation of residential mobility and housing tenure choice. Journal of Regional Science, 36:3, pp. 335-363.
26. Lee, L. F. and Trost, R. P. (1978) Estimation of some limits dependent variable models with application to housing demand. Journal of Econometrics, 8, pp. 357-382.
27. Malpezzi, S. (2003) Hedonic pricing models: A selective and applied review. Housing Economics and Public Policy, pp. 67-89. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
28. Manrique, J. and Ojah, K. (2003) The demand for housing in Spain: An endogenous switching regression analysis. Applied Economics, 35, pp. 323-336.
29. McFadden, D. L. (2000) conference of the International Association of Travel Behavior Analys Brisbane, Australia Disaggregate behavioural travel demand's RUM side: A 30-year retrospective
30. McFadden, D. L. and Train, K. (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15:5, pp. 447-470.
31. Murphy, K. M. and Topel, R. H. (1985) Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3:4, pp. 88-97.
32. Rapaport, C. (1997) Housing demand and community choice: An empirical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, pp. 243-260.
33. Rosen, H. S. (1979) Housing decisions and the U.S. income tax: An econometric analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 11, pp. 1-23.
34. Rouwendal, J. and Meijer, E. (2001) Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: A mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41:3, pp. 475-505.
35. Skaburskis, A. (1999) Modelling the choice of tenure and building type. Urban Studies, 36:13, pp. 2199-2215.
36. Thibodeau, T. G. (1995) House price indices from the 1984-1992 MSA American housing surveys. Journal of Housing Research, 6, pp. 439-481.
37. Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
38. Tu, Y. and Goldfinch, J. (1996) A two-stage housing choice forecasting model. Urban Studies, 33:3, pp. 517-537.
39. Walker, B., Marsh, A., Wardman, M. and Niner, P. (2002) Modelling tenants' choices in the public rented sector: A stated preference approach. Urban Studies, 39:4, pp. 665-688.