Advances in high-Throughput high-performance liquid chromatography and "purification-friendly" combinatorial library design strategies

Advances in Chromatography

Volumn 45, Issue , 2007, Pages 197-213

  Schefzick, Sabine ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; SOLVENT;

AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; AUTOMATION; CHEMICAL MODEL; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; DRUG SCREENING; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PHARMACEUTICS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

AUTOMATION; CHROMATOGRAPHY, AFFINITY; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; LIGANDS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLVENTS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL;

EID: 34548455374     PISSN: 00652415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Wehr, T., Fast LC for high-throughput LC-MS, LCGC N. Am., 20(1): 40, 2002.
2. Müeller-Kuhrt, L., God, R., Gumm, H., and Binkele, J., Device and method for the parallel separation of substances by liquid chromatography, U.S. patent no. 6, 911, 151 B1, 2000.
3. de Biasi, V., Haskins, N., Organ, A., Bateman, R., Giles, K., and Jarvis, S., High throughput liquid chromatography/mass spectrometric analyses using a novel multiplexed electrospray interface, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 13, 1165, 1999.
4. Zhao, J., Zhang, L., and Yan, B., Strategies and methods for purifying organic compounds and combinatorial libraries, in Analysis and Purification Methods in Combinatorial Chemistry, Yan, B., ed., Wiley, New York, 2004, p. 253.
5. Majors, R.E., The role of the column in preparative HPLC, LCGC Eur., 17, 512, 2004.
6. Zhu, J. and Coscolluella, C., Chromatographic assay of pharmaceutical compounds under column overloading, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl., 741, 55, 2000.
7. Weller, H.N., Young, M.G., Michalczyk, S.J., Reitnauer, G.H., Cooley, R.S., Rahn, P.C., Loyd, D.J., Fiore, D., and Fischman, S.J., High throughput analysis and purification in support of automated parallel synthesis, Mol. Divers., 3, 61, 1997.
8. Routburg, M., Swenson, R., Schmitt, B., Washington, A., Mueller, S., Hochlowski, J., Maslana, G., Minin, B., Matuszak, K., Searle, P., and Pan, J., Implementation of an automated purification/verification system, in International Symposium on Laboratory Automation and Robotics, Zymark Corporation, Hopkington, MA, 1996.
9. Hochlowski, J., High-throughput purification: Triage and optimization, in Analysis and Purification Methods in Combinatorial Chemistry, Yan, B., ed., Wiley, New York, 2004, p. 281.
10. Agilent Technologies, Agilent 1100 series, http://www.chem.agilent.com/Scripts/PDS.asp?lPage=89, 2005.
11. Kibbey, C.E., An automated system for the purification of combinatorial libraries by preparative LC/MS, Lab. Robot. Automat., 9, 309, 1997.
12. Coffey, P., Ramieri, J., Garr, C., and Schultz, L., An open, multivendor specification for high-throughput organic chemistry (HTOC): A flexible production process for pure, characterized, quantified organic compounds, Am. Lab., 31, 57, 1999.
13. Schultz, L., Garr, C.D., Cameron, L.M., and Bukowski, J., High throughput purification of combinatorial libraries, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 8, 2409, 1998.
14. Edwards, C. and Hunter, D.J., High-throughput purification of combinatorial arrays, J. Comb. Chem., 5, 61, 2003.
15. Zeng, L., Burton, L., Yung, K., Shushan, B., and Kassel, D.B., Automated analytical/preparative high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry system for the rapid characterization and purification of compound libraries, J. Chromatogr. A, 794, 3, 1998.
16. Zeng, L. and Kassel, D.B., Developments of a fully automated parallel HPLC/mass spectrometry system for the analytical characterization and preparative purification of combinatorial libraries, Anal. Chem., 70, 4380, 1998.
17. Kiplinger, J.P., Cole, R.O., Robinson, S., Roskamp, E.J., Ware, R.S., O'Connell, H.J., Brailsford, A., and Batt, J., Structure-controlled automated purification of parallel synthesis products in drug discovery, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 12, 658, 1998.
18. Eckers, C., Wolff, J.-C., Haskins, N.J., Sage, A.B., Giles, K., and Bateman, R., Accurate mass liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry on orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass analyzers using switching between separate sample and reference sprays. 1. Proof of concept, Anal. Chem., 72, 3683, 2000.
19. Spickermann, J., Between automatized synthesis and high-throughput screening, LaborPraxis, 24, 45, 2000.
20. Waters Corporation, MUX technology, www.waters.co.jp/product/ms/lcms/mux-sys.html, 2005.
21. Van Pelt, C.K., Corso, T.N., Schultz, G.A., Lowes, S., and Henion, J., A four-column parallel chromatography system for isocratic or gradient LC/MS analyses, Anal. Chem., 73, 582, 2001.
22. Liu, H., Felten, C., Xue, Q., Zhang, B., Jedrzejewski, P., Karger, B.L., and Foret, F., Development of multichannel devices with an array of electrospray tips for highthroughput mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 72, 3303, 2000.
23. Xu, R., Wang, T., Isbell, J., Cai, Z., Sykes, C., Brailsford, A., and Kassel, D.B., Highthroughput mass-directed parallel purification incorporating a multiplexed single quadrupole mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 74, 3055, 2002.
24. Isbell, J.J., Xu, R., Cai, Z., and Kassel, D.B., Realities of high-throughput liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry purification of large combinatorial libraries: A report on overall sample throughput using parallel purification, J. Comb. Chem., 4, 600, 2002.
25. Isbell, J.J., Zhou, Y., Guintu, C., Rynd, M., Jiang, S., Petrov, D., Micklash, K., Mainquist, J., Ek, J., Chang, J., Weselak, M., Backes, B.J., Brailsford, A., and Shave, D., Purifying the masses: integrating prepurification quality control, high-throughput LC/MS purification, and compound plating to feed high-throughput screening, J. Comb. Chem., 7, 210, 2005.
26. Koppitz, M., Brailsford, A., and Wenz, M., Maximizing automation in LC/MS highthroughput analysis and purification, J. Comb. Chem., 7, 714, 2005.
27. Agilent Technologies, 1200 Series LC/MSD, http://www.chem.agilent.com 2005.
28. Thermo Electron Corporation, http://www.thermo.com/com/cda/category/category-lp/1, 2152, 64, 00.html, 2005.
29. Schefzick, S., Kibbey, C., and Bradley, M.P., Prediction of HPLC conditions using QSPR techniques: An effective tool to improve combinatorial library design, J. Comb. Chem., 6, 916, 2004.
30. Hansch, C., Maloney, P.P., Fujita, T., and Muir, R.M., Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients, Nature (Lond.), 194, 178, 1962.
31. Abraham, M.H., Rosés, M., Poole, C.F., and Poole, S.K., Hydrogen bonding. 42. Characterization of reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic C18 stationary phases, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 10, 358, 1997.
32. Platts, J.A., Abraham, M.H., Butina, D., and Hersey, A., Estimation of molecular linear free energy relationship descriptors by a group contribution approach, J. Chem. Inform. Comp. Sci., 39, 835, 1999.
33. Platts, J.A., Abraham, M.H., Butina, D., and Hersey, A., Estimation of molecular linear free energy relationship descriptors by a group contribution approach. 2. Prediction of partition coefficients, J. Chem. Inform. Comp. Sci., 40, 71, 2000.
34. Kaliszan, R., Quantitative Structure-Chromatographic Retention Relationships, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.
35. Kaliszan, R., Computer aids to chemistry, in Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Vernin, G. and Chanon, M., eds., Chichester, Ellis Horwood, 1986.
36. Kaliszan, R., Multivariate chemometrics in QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationships): A dialogue, in Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Mager, P.P., ed., Wiley, New York, 1988.
37. Kaliszan, R., Quantitative structure-retention relationships applied to reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, J. Chromatogr. A, 656, 417, 1993.
38. Kaliszan, R., Retention data from affinity high-performance liquid chromatography in view of chemometrics, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl., 715, 229, 1998.
39. Kaliszan, R., Chromatography and capillary electrophoresis in modelling the basic processes of drug action, Trends Anal. Chem., 18, 400, 1999.
40. Kaliszan, R., Haber, P., Baczek, T., Siluk, D., and Valko, K., Lipophilicity and pKa estimates from gradient high-performance liquid chromatography, J. Chromatogr. A, 965, 117, 2002.
41. Kaliszan, R., van Straten, M.A., Markuszewski, M., Cramers, C.A., and Claessens, H.A., Molecular mechanism of retention in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and classification of modern stationary phases by using quantitative structure-retention relationships, J. Chromatogr. A, 855, 455, 1999.
42. Baczek, T. and Kaliszan, R., Quantitative structure/retention relationships in affinity chromatography, J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth., 49, 83, 2001.
43. Baczek, T. and Kaliszan, R., Combination of linear solvent strength model and quantitative structure-retention relationships as a comprehensive procedure of approximate prediction of retention in gradient liquid chromatography, J. Chromatogr. A, 962, 41, 2002.
44. Baczek, T. and Kaliszan, R., Predictive approaches to gradient retention based on analyte structural descriptors from calculation chemistry, J. Chromatogr. A, 987, 29, 2003.
45. Put, R., Perrin, C., Questier, F., Coomans, D., Massart, D.L., Vander Heyden, Y., Classification and regression tree analysis for molecular descriptor selection and retention prediction in chromatographic quantitative structure-retention relationship studies, J. Chromatogr. A, 988, 261, 2003.
46. Luan, F., Xue, C., Zhang, R., Zhao, C., Liu, M., Hu, Z., and Fan, B., Prediction of retention time of a variety of volatile organic compounds based on the heuristic method and support vector machine, Anal. Chim. Acta, 537, 101, 2005.
47. Baczek, T., Kaliszan, R., Novotna, K., and Jandera, P., Comparative characteristics of HPLC columns based on quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) and hydrophobic-subtraction model, J. Chromatogr. A, 1075, 109, 2005.
48. Snyder, L.R., Dolan, J.W., and Carr, P.W., The hydrophobic-subtraction model of reversed-phase column selectivity, J. Chromatogr. A, 1060, 77, 2004.
49. Galushko, S.V., Software for method development in HPLC, GIT Spez. Chromatogr., 2, 88, 1996.
50. Snyder, L.R. and Quarry, M.A., Computer simulation in HPLC method development: reducing the error of predicted retention times, J. Liq. Chromatogr., 10, 1789, 1987.
51. Dolan, J.W., Snyder, L.R., Djordjevic, N.M., Hill, D.W., and Waeghe, T.J., Reversedphase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time: I. Peak capacity limitations, J. Chromatogr. A, 857, 1, 1999.
52. Dolan, J.W., Snyder, L.R., Djordjevic, N.M., Hill, D.W., and Waeghe, T.J., Reversedphase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time: II. Two-run assay procedures, J. Chromatogr. A, 857, 21, 1999.
53. Dolan, J.W., Snyder, L.R., Wolcott, R.G., Haber, P., Baczek, T., Kaliszan, R., and Sander, L.C., Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time: III. Improving the accuracy of computer simulation, J. Chromatogr. A, 857, 41, 1999.
54. Williams, A., Kolovanov, E., and Hofmann, H., Chromatographic data system with integrated molecular structure management, GIT Labor Fachzeit., 44, 154, 2000.
55. Delaurent, C., Brenier-Maurel, C., Galushko, S.V., Tanchuk, V., Shishkina, I., et al. Chromatography and chemometry: A software for computer assisted method in high performance liquid chromatography, Spectra Anal., 31, 34, 2002.
56. Ghose, A.K., Viswanadhan, V.N., and Wendoloski, J.J., Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 3762, 1998.