Loopholes and missing links in protein modeling

Protein Science

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1999-2012

  Rossi, Karen A ^a   Weigelt, Carolyn A ^a   Nayeem, Akbar ^a   Krystek Jr , Stanley R ^a  

^a BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

Author keywords

Homology modeling; Loop modeling; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DISULFIDES; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34548447184     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.072887807     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cohen, B.I., Presnell, S.R., and Cohen, F.E. 1993. Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides. Protein Sci. 2: 2134-2145.
2. Esposito, E.X., Tobi, D., and Madura, J.D. 2006. Comparative protein modeling. In Reviews in Computation Chemisty (eds. K.B. Lipkowitz et al.) Vol. 22, pp. 57-167. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
3. Fetrow, J.S., Godzik, A., and Skolnick, J.S. 1998. Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome using sequence-structure-function paradigm: Identification of proteins exhibiting the glutaredoxin/thioredoxin disulfide oxidoreductase activity. J. Mol. Biol. 282: 703-711.
4. Fine, R.M., Wang, H., Shenkin, P.S., Yarmush, D.L., and Levinthal, C. 1986. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations. Proteins 1: 342-362.
5. Fiser, A., Do, R.K., and Sali, A. 2000. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 9: 1753-1773.
6. Gallicchio, E., Zhang, L.Y., and Levy, R.M. 2002. The SGB/NP hydration free energy model based on the surface generalized born solvent reaction field and novel nonpolar hydration free energy estimators. J. Comput. Chem. 23: 517-529.
7. Ghosh, A., Rapp, C.S., and Friesner, R.A. 1998. Generalized born model based on surface integral formulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 10983-10990.
8. Hillisch, A. and Hilgenfeld, R. 2003. The role of protein 3D structures in the drug discovery process. In Modern methods of drug discovery. (eds. A. Hillisch and R. Hilgenfeld), pp. 157-218. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
9. Hillisch, A., Pineda, L.F., and Hilgenfeld, R. 2004. Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process. Drug Discov. Today 9: 659-669.
10. Hobrath, J.V. and Wang, S. 2006. Computational elucidation of the structural basis of ligand binding to the Dopamine 3 receptor through docking and homology modeling. J. Med. Chem. 49: 4470-4476.
11. Jacobson, M.P. and Sali, A. 2004. Comparative protein structure modeling and its applications to drug discovery. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 39: 259-276.
12. Jacobson, M.P., Kaminski, G.A., Friesner, R.A., and Rapp, C.S. 2002. Force field validation using protein side chain prediction. J. Phys. Chem. B 106: 11673-11680.
13. Jacobson, M.P., Pincus, D.L., Rapp, C.S., Day, T.J.F., Honig, B., Shaw, D.E., and Friesner, R.A. 2004. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 55: 351-367.
14. Jones, S. and Thornton, J.M. 1997. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 133-143.
15. Jorgensen, W.L., Maxwell, D.S., and Tirado-Rives, J. 1996. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118: 11225-11236.
16. Kairys, V., Fernandes, M.X., and Gilson, M.K. 2006. Screening drug-like compounds by docking to homology models: A systematic study. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46: 365-379.
17. Kaminski, G.A., Friesner, R.A., Tirado-Rives, J., and Jorgensen, W.L. 2001. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 105: 6474-6487.
18. Kasuya, A. and Thornton, J.M. 1999. Three-dimensional structure analysis of PROSITE patterns. J. Mol. Biol. 286: 1673-1691.
19. Kick, E.K., Roe, D.C., Skillman, A.G., Liu, G., Ewing, T.J., Sun, Y., Kuntz, I.D., and Ellman, J.A. 1997. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nano-molar inhibitors of cathepsin D. Chem. Biol. 4: 297-307.
20. Kleywegt, G.J. 1999. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 1887-1897.
21. Kornev, A.P., Haste, N.M., Taylor, S.S., and Ten Eyck, L.F. 2006. Surface comparison of active and inactive protein kinases identifies a conserved activation mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 17783-17788.
22. Kortagere, S., Roy, A., and Mehler, E.L. 2006. Ab initio computational modeling of long loops in G-protein coupled receptors. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 20: 427-436.
23. MacKerell Jr., A.D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack Jr., R., Evanseck, J., Field, M., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., et al. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 3586-3616.
24. Mehler, E.L., Hassan, S.A., Kortagere, S., and Weinstein, H. 2006. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein coupled receptors: Lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin. Proteins 64: 673-690.
25. Mezei, M. 1998. Chameleon sequences in the PDB. Protein Eng. 11: 411-414.
26. Nayeem, A., Sitkoff, D., and Krystek Jr., S.R. 2006. A comparative study of available software for high accuracy homology modeling: From sequence alignments to structural models. Protein Sci. 15: 808-824.
27. Polgar, T. and Keserue, G.M. 2006. Ensemble docking into flexible active sites. Critical evaluation of FlexE against JNK-3 and β-Secretase. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46: 1795-1805.
28. Rohl, C.A., Strauss, C.E.M., Chivian, D., and Baker, D. 2004. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with Rosetta. Proteins 55: 656-677.
29. Rummey, C. and Metz, G. 2007. Homology models of dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9 with a focus on loop predictions near the active site. Proteins 66: 160-171.
30. Russell, R.B., Sasieni, P.D., and Sternberg, M.J.E. 1998. Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J. Mol. Biol. 282: 903-918.
31. Sander, C. and Schneider, R. 1991. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9: 56-68.
32. Shenkin, P.S., Yarmush, D.L., Fine, R.M., Want, H., and Levinthal, C. 1987. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ring like structures. Biopolymers 26: 2053-2085.
33. Singh, N., Cheve, G., Avery, M.A., and McCurdy, C.R. 2006. Comparative protein modeling of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase enzyme from plasmodium falciparum: A potential target for antimalarial drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46: 1360-1370.
34. Sybyl. 2005. Tripos, Inc. St. Louis, MO.
35. Wallner, B. and Elofsson, A. 2005. All are not equal: A benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci. 14: 1315-1327.
36. Wei, L., Huang, E.S., and Altman, R.B. 1999. Are protein structures good enough to preserve protein sites? Structure 7: 643-650.
37. Wieman, H., Tondel, K., Anderssen, E., and Drablos, F. 2004. Homology-based modelling of targets for rational drug design. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 4: 793-804.
38. Xiang, Z.X., Soto, C.S., and Honig, B. 2002. Evaluating conformational free energies; The colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 7432-7437.