Numerical aspects of real-space approaches to strong-field electron dynamics

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 226, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 89-103

  de Wijn, Astrid S ^a   Kümmel, Stephan ^b   Lein, Manfred ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Density functional theory; Exchange correlation potential; Real space methods; Strong field ionization; Time dependent Schr dinger equation

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; DYNAMICS; GROUND STATE; IONIZATION POTENTIAL; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL-THEORY; ELECTRON DYNAMICS; EXCHANGE-CORRELATION POTENTIAL; NUMERICAL ASPECTS; REAL SPACE METHODS; STRONG FIELD; STRONG FIELD IONIZATION; TIME DEPENDENT; TIME DEPENDENT DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; TIME-DEPENDENT SCHRÖDINGE EQUATION;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 34548438429     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Grobe R., and Eberly J.H. Phys. Rev. A 48 (1993) 4664
2. Lappas D.G., Sanpera A., Watson J.B., Burnett K., Knight P.L., Grobe R., and Eberly J.H. J. Phys. B 29 (1996) L619
3. Becker A., and Faisal F.H.M. J. Phys. B 29 (1996) L197
4. Bauer D. Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997) 3028
5. Lappas D.G., and van Leeuwen R. J. Phys. B 31 (1998) L249
6. Lein M., Gross E.K.U., and Engel V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4707
7. Dahlen N.E., and van Leeuwen R. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 023405
8. Chu X., and Chu S. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 063404
9. Parker J., Taylor K.T., Clark C.W., and Blodgett-Ford S. J. Phys. B 29 (1996) L33
10. van der Hart H.W., Doherty B.J.S., Parker J.S., and Taylor K.T. J. Phys. B 38 (2005) L207
11. Gross E.K.U., Dobson J.F., Petersilka M., and Nalewajski R.F. In: Nalewajski R.F. (Ed). Density Functional Theory II. Topics in Current Chemistry vol. 181 (1996), Springer-Berlin 81
12. Ullrich C.A., Erhard S., and Gross E.K.U. In: Muller H.G., and Fedorov M.V. (Eds). Super Intense Laser Atom Physics IV, Nato ASI series 3/13 (1996), Kluwer, Dordrecht 267
13. Zangwill A., and Soven P. Phys. Rev. A 21 (1980) 1561
14. Ekardt W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1925
15. Reinhard P.-G., Brack M., Calvayrac F., Kohl C., Kümmel S., Suraud E., and Ullrich C.A. Eur. Phys. J. D 9 (1999) 111
16. Kümmel S., Andrae K., and Reinhard P.-G. Appl. Phys. B 73 (2001) 293
17. Petersilka M., and Gross E.K.U. Laser Phys. 9 (1999) 105
18. Walker B., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 1227
19. Moshammer R., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 447
20. Corkum P.B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1994
21. Lein M., and Kümmel S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 143003
22. Mundt M., and Kümmel S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 203004
23. See http://www.fftw.org/.
24. Kosloff R., and Tal-Ezer H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 127 (1986) 223
25. Feit M.D., Fleck Jr. J.A., and Steiger A. J. Comput. Phys. 47 (1982) 412
26. Heather R., and Metiu H. J. Chem. Phys. 86 (1987) 5009
27. Goldberg A., and Shore B.W. J. Phys. B 11 (1978) 3339
28. Leforestier C., and Wyatt R.E. J. Chem. Phys. 78 (1983) 2334
29. For one-orbital systems, there is no difference between the Hartree-Fock definition of exchange and the Kohn-Sham definition of exchange.
30. Hessler P., Park J., and Burke K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 378
31. Hessler P., Park J., and Burke K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 5184
32. Hessler P., Maitra N.T., and Burke K. J. Chem. Phys. 117 (2002) 72
33. D'Amico I., and Vignale G. Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 7876
34. Runge E., and Gross E.K.U. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 997
35. van Leeuwen R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 3863
36. For a related discussion see. Kümmel S. J. Comput. Phys. 201 (2004) 333
37. Becke A.D. J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 1053
38. Perdew J.P., and Wang Y. Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 12947
39. We were made aware of this argument in a discussion with T. Kirchner.
40. Wilken F., and Bauer D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 203001