Emergency physicians' pain judgments: Cluster analyses on scenarios of acute abdominal pain

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1267-1273

  Marquié, Laetitia ^a   Sorum, Paul C ^b   Mullet, Etienne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^b ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Abdominal pain; Emergency medicine; Functional theory of cognition; Pain treatment; Physician pain rating

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DISEASE; ACUTE ABDOMEN; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APPENDICITIS; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ACUTE DISEASE; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PERCEPTION; PILOT PROJECTS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 34548438406     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9228-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of methods. Pain, 27, 17-26.
2. Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983). The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 17, 45-56.
3. Kaasalainen, S., Middleton, J., Knezacek, S., Hartley, T., Stewart, N., Ife C., & Robinson, L. (1998). Pain and cognitive status in the institutionalized elderly. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 24, 24-31.
4. McCaffery, M., & Gerrell, B. R. (1997). Nurses' knowledge of pain assessment and management: How much progress have we made? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 14, 175-188.
5. Tait, R. C., & Chibnall, J. T. (2002). Pain in older subacute care patients: associations with clinical status and treatment. Pain Medicine, 3, 231-239.
6. Herr, K., Titler, M. G., Schilling, M. L., Marsh, J. L, Xie, X., Ardery, G., Clarke, W. R., & Everett, L. Q. (2004). Evidence-based assessment of acute pain in older adults: current nursing practices and perceived barriers. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20, 331-340.
7. Visentin, M., Zanolin, E., Trentin, L., Sartori, S., & De Marco, R. (2005). Prevalence and treatment of pain in adults admitted to Italian hospitals. European Journal of Pain, 9, 61-67.
8. Blettery, B., Ebrahm, L., Honnart, D., & Aube, H. (1996). Les échelles de mesure de la douleur dans un service d'accueil des urgences. Reanimation Urgences, 5, 691-697.
9. Marquié, L., Raufaste, E., Lauque, D., Marine, C., Ecoiffier, M., & Sorum, P. C. (2003). Pain rating by patients and physicians: Evidence of systematic pain miscalibration. Pain, 102/103, 289-296.
10. Marquié, L., Raufaste, E., Lauque, D., Marine, C., Ecoiffier, M., & Sorum, P. C. (2004). Further results about pain rating by patients and physicians: Reply to Chibnall and Tait. Pain, 107, 194-195.
11. Bartfield, J. M., Salluzzo, R. F., Raccio-Robak, N., Funk, D. L., & Verdile, V. P. (1997). Physician and patient factors influencing the treatment of low back pain. Pain, 73, 209-211.
12. Thomas, S. H., Borczuk, P., Shackelford, J., Ostrander, J., Silver, D., Evans, M., & Stein, J. (1999). Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, 586-590.
13. Chibnall, J. T., Tait, R. C., & Ross, L. R. (1997). The effects of medical evidence and pain intensity on medical student judgments of chronic pain patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 257-271.
14. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In A. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under undercertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 341-366). Cambridge University Press.
15. Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L. (1989). Methodology for measuring health-state preferences-I: measurement strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 345-354.
16. Anderson, N. H. (1996). A Functional Theory of Cognition. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Sorum, P. C., Stewart, T. R., Mullet, E., González-Vallejo, C., Shim, J., Chasseigne, G., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Grenier, B. (2002). Does choosing a treatment depend on making a diagnosis? U.S. and French physicians' decision making about acute otitis media. Medical Decision Making, 22, 394-402.
18. Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
19. Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) (2001). Empirical directions in design and analyses. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Jones, T. V., Gerrity, M. S., & Earp, J. (1990). Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 805-815.
21. Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1715-1722.