SOX, compliance, and power relationships

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 97-102

  Braganza, Ashley ^a,b   Franken, Arnoud ^b  

^a Centre for Organizational Transformation

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MANAGERS; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STANDARDIZATION;

CENTRALIZATION; DECISION RIGHTS; POWER RELATIONSHIP;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34548417508     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1284621.1284626     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Berghel, H. The two sides of ROI: Return on investment vs. risk of incarceration. Commun. ACM. 48, 4 (Apr. 2005), 15-20.
2. Castells, M.A. Rejoinder: On power, identities and culture in the network society. New Political. Economy 3, 3 (1998), 473-483.
3. CRA International. Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Costs and Implementation Issues: Spring 2006 Survey Update. Washington, DC.
4. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Rev. 48, 2 (1983), 147-160.
5. Donovan, J.J. Beyond chief information officer to network manager. Harvard Business Review, 66, 5 (1988), 134-140.
6. Hall, R.H. Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes, 7th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
7. Jasperson, J.S., Carte, T.A., Saunders, CS., Butler, B.S., Croes, H.J.P., and Zheng, W. Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly 26, 4, 397-459, 2002.
8. King, J.L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L., McFarlan, F.W., Raman, K.S., and Yap, C.S. Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 5, 2, (1994), 139-169.
9. Lucas, H.C.J. Organizational power and the Information Services Department. Commun. ACM 27, 1, (Jan. 1984), 58-65.
10. Robey, D. and Boudreau, M.C. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research 10, 2 (1999), 167-185.