Validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ v. 2.1) for patients undergoing prophylactic migraine treatment

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1231-1237

  Cole, Jason C ^a   Lin, Peggy ^a   Rupnow, Marcia F T ^b  

^a QualityMetric   (United States)

^b JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Migraine; Migraine prophylaxis; MSQ; Psychometrics; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO; TOPIRAMATE;

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EMOTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; FRUSTRATION; GENDER; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIGRAINE; MIGRAINE SPECIFIC QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SAMPLE; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; ANALGESICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECEPTORS, SEROTONIN; SEROTONIN AGONISTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 34548412101     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9217-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., Diamond, S., Diamond, M. L., & Reed, M. (2001). Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache, 41, 646-657.
2. Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., & Scher, A. I. (2001). Epidemiology and economic impact of migraine. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 17S, S4-S12.
3. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Treatment of primary headache: Preventive treatment of migraine. Standards of care for headache diagnosis and treatment. 2005 [cited December 4, 2006]; Available from: www.guideline.gov/ summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=6580.
4. Snow, V., Weiss, K., Wall, E. M., & Mottur-Pilson, C., for the American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. (2002). Pharmacologic management of acute attacks of migraine and prevention of migraine headache. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137, 840-849.
5. Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. Jr. (2003). The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: A re-analysis of three clinical trials. Quality of Life Research, 12, 887-902.
6. Jhingran, P., Osterhaus, J. T., Miller, D. W., Lee, J. T., & Kirchdoerfer, L. (1997). Development and validation of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire. Headache, 38, 295-302.
7. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238-247.
8. Silberstein, S. D., Neto, W., Schmitt, J., Jacobs, D., for the MIGR-001 Study Group. (2004). Topiramate in migraine prevention: Results of a large controlled trial. Archives of Neurology, 61, 490-495.
9. Brandes, J. L., Saper, J. R., Diamond, M., Couche, J. R., Lewis, D. W., Schmitt, J., et al. (2004). Topiramate for migraine prevention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 965-973.
10. Diamond, M., Dahlöf, C., Papadopoulos, G., & Neto, W. (2005). Topiramate improves health-related quality of life when used to prevent migraine. Headache, 45, 1023-1030.
11. Jhingran, P., Davis, S. M., LaVange, L. M., Miller, D. W., & Helms, R.W. (1998). MSQ: Migraine-specific quality-of-life questionnaire: Further investigation of the factor structure. Pharmacoeconomics, 13, 707-717.
12. Martin, B. C., Pathak, D. S., Sharfman, M. I., Adelman, J. U., Taylor, F., Kwong, W. J., et al. (2000). Validity and reliability of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache, 40, 204-215.
13. Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. Jr. (2003). Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT (TM)) to the metric of traditional headache scales. Quality of Life Research, 12, 981-1002.
14. Ware, J. E. Jr., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric.
15. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
16. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Cole, J. C. How to deal with missing data: Conceptual overview and details for implementing two modern methods. In J. W. Osborne (Eds.), Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (in press).
18. Cole, J. C., Khanna, D., Clements, P. J., Seibold, J. R., Tashkin, D. P., Paulus, H. E., et al. (2006). Single-factor scoring validation for the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) in patients with systemic sclerosis and comparison with early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1383-1394.
19. Muraki, E. (1997). A generalized partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden, & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. (pp. 153-164). New York: Springer.
20. Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459.
21. 2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289-298.
22. Zumbo, B. D. (1999) A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
23. Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. Jr. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT (TM)). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913-933.
24. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1998). Psychological testing. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
27. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychological Assessment, 16, 360-372.