Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 656-668

  Tye Murray, Nancy ^a   Sommers, Mitchell S ^b   Spehar, Brent ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APTITUDE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; PRESBYCUSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 34548409049     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7185     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ASHA. (1988). Guidelines for determining threshold levels for speech, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 85-89.
2. Arnold, P., Hill, F. (2001). Bisensory augmentation: A speechreading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 339-355.
3. Bench, J., Bamford, J. (1979). Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children. London, UK: Academic Press.
4. Bernstein, L. E., Demorest, M. E., Tucker, P. E. (2000). Speech perception without hearing. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 233-252.
5. Blamey, P. J., Cowan, R. S. C., Alcantara, J. I., Whitford, L. A., Clark, G. M. (1989). Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 26, 15-24.
6. Braida, L. (1991). Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments. Psychology Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 647-677.
7. Cienkowski, K. M., Carney, A. E. (2002). Auditory-visual speech perception and aging, Ear and Hearing, 23, 439-449.
8. Clouser, R. A. (1977). Relative phoneme visibility and lipreading performance. Volta Review, 79, 27-34.
9. Dancer, J., Krain, M., Thompson, C., Davis, P., Glenn, J. (1994). A cross-sectional investigation of speechreading in adults: Effects of age, gender, practice and education. Volta Review, 96, 31-40.
10. Erber, N. (1972). Auditory, visual and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 413-422.
11. Fletcher, H. M. (1953). Speech and hearing in communication. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
12. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., McHugh, P. R. (1975). Minimental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychological Research, 12, 189-198.
13. Grant, K. W. (2002). Measures of auditory-visual integration for speech understanding: A theoretical perspective. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 30-33.
14. Grant, K. W., Walden, B. E., Seitz, P. F. (1998). Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2677-2690.
15. Hanin, L. (1988). The effects of experience and linguistic context on speechreading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The City University Graduate School, New York, NY.
16. Honneil, S., Dancer, J., Gentry, B. (1991). Age and speechreading performance in relation to percent correct, eyeblinks, and written responses. Volta Review, 207-212.
17. Hygge, S., Ronnberg, J., Larsby, B., Arlinger, S. (1992). Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 208-215.
18. Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337-1351.
19. Kricos, P. B., Lesner, S. A. (1982). Differences in visual intelligibility across talkers. Volta Review, 84, 219-225.
20. Kricos, P. B., Lesner, S. A. (1985). Effect of talker differences on the speechreading of hearing-impaired teenagers. Volta Review, 87, 5-14.
21. Lesner, S. A., Sandridge, S. A., Kricos, P. B. (1987). Training influences on visual consonant and sentence recognition. Ear and Hearing, 8, 283-287.
22. Lyxell, B., Ronnberg, J. (1991). Word discrimination and chronological age related to sentence-based speech-reading skill. British Journal of Audiology, 25, 3-10.
23. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M. (2000). Tests of auditory-visual integration efficiency within the framework of the fuzzy logical model of perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 784-789.
24. Middelweerd, M. J., Plomp, R. (1987). The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 2145-2147.
25. Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329-335.
26. Pelli, D., Robson, J., Wilkins, A. (1998). The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clinical Vision Science, 2, 187-199.
27. Pelson, R. O., Prather, W. F. (1974). Effects of visual message-related cues, age, and hearing impairment on speechreading performance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 518-525.
28. Reisberg, D., McLean, J., Goldfield, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: A speechreading advantage with intact stimuli. In R. Campbell & B. Dodd (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 97-113). London: Erlbaum.
29. Shoop, C., Binnie, C. A. (1979). The effects of age upon the visual perception of speech. Scandinavian Audiology, 8, 3-8.
30. Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, Calif: W. H. Freeman & Co.
31. Sommers, M. S., Spehar, B., Tye-Murray, N. (2005). The effects of signal-to-noise ratio on auditory-visual integration: Integration and encoding are not independent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2574.
32. Sommers, M. S., Tye-Murray, N., Spehar, B. (2005). Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults. Ear and Hearing, 26, 263-275.
33. Spehar, B., Tye-Murray, N., Sommers, M. (2004). Time-compressed visual speech and age: A first report. Ear and Hearing, 25, 565-572.
34. Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A rationalized arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455-462.
35. Sumby, W. H., Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contributions to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
36. Tillberg, I., Ronnberg, J., Svard, I., Ahliner, B. (1996). Audiovisual speechreading in a group of hearing aid users: The effects of onset age, handicap age, and degree of hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology, 25, 267-272.
37. Tye-Murray, N. (2004). Foundations of aural rehabilitation: Children, adults, and their family members. Albany, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
38. Tye-Murray, N., Geers, A. (2001). Children's audio-visual enhancement test. St. Louis, Mo: Central Institute for the Deaf.
39. Tyler, R. D., Preece, J., Tye-Murray, N. (1986). The Iowa laser videodisk tests. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa Hospitals.
40. Walden, B. E., Busacco, D. A., Montgomery, A. A. (1993). Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 431-436.