Hand functionality tests in amputated upper limb with prosthesis;I test di funzionalità della mano in amputati di arto superiore con protesi

Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 203-209

  Bazzini, G ^a,c   Orlandini, D ^b   Moscato, T A ^b   Nicita, D ^b   Panigazzi, M ^a  

^a IRCCS   (Italy)

^b Centro Protesi INAIL   (Italy)

^c IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Amputation; Hand

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DISABLED PERSON; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE;

AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 34548402911     PISSN: 15927830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health Status Measures: Strategies and Analytic Methods for Assessing Change Scores. Phys Ther 1996; 76 (10): 1109-1123.
2. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW et Al. Employment Status, Job Characteristics, and Work-Related Health Experience of People With a Lower Limb Amputation in The Netherlands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 239-245.
3. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW et Al. Job Satisfaction and Health Experience of People With a Lower-Limb Amputation in Comparison with Healthy Colleagues. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 628-634.
4. Atkins DJ, Heard DCY, Donovan WH. Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities. JPO 1996; 8 (1): 2-17.
5. Peethambaran A. The Relationship between Performance, Satisfaction, and Well Being for Patients Using Anterior and Posterior Design Knee-ankle-foot- orthosis. JPO 2000; 12 (1): 33.
6. Polliack AA, Moser S. Outcomes Forum: Facing the Future of Orthotics and Prosthetics Proactively: Theory and Practice of Outcomes Measures as a Method for Determining Quality of Services. JPO 1997; 9 (3): 127.
7. Lake C Effects of Prosthetic Training on Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Use. JPO 1997; 9 (1): 3.
8. Frey DD, Carlson LE, Ramaswamy V. Voluntary-Opening Prehensors with Adjustable Grip force. JPO 1995; 7 (4): 124.
9. Franchignoni F, Bazzini G. Misurazione dell'efficacia terapeutica in Medicina Riabilitativa. In: Basaglia N, Pace P. Valutazione e qualità dell'assistenza in Medicina Riabilitativa. Gnocchi Ed. Napoli, 1995: 67-87.
10. Orlandini D., Bazzini G. La valutazione funzionale delle protesi di arto superiore. Atti Congresso "Tecniche di ricostruzione chirurgica e protesica nelle lesioni traumatiche amputanti della mano", Firenze 20/10/2001; pagg. 32-36.
11. Bazzini G, Panigazzi M. Criteri di valutazione delle capacita residue ai fini del ripristino occupazionale. Atti congresso internazionale: "La riabilitazione dopo infortunio lavorativo"; Norcia, 13-17 giugno 2000; pag. 73-75.
12. Gabrielli M., Giardini G., Bazzini G., Moneo F. Modello organizzativo di intervento preventivo-riabilitativo-ergonomico tra INAIL e Fondazione Maugeri. Atti Congresso Intemazionale "L'Europa delle riabilitazioni" Roma, ottobre 1999.
13. Bazzini G. Sistemi di valutazione dei livelli funzionali (impairment, activity, participation). In: "La riabilitazione post-lesionale da evento traumatico", Promodis-BS, 1999, pagg. 147-152
14. Bazzini G, Capodaglio P. Valutazione delia funzionalità delia mano. In: (Capodaglio P., Bazzini G. eds.) Activities of the upper limbs: aspects of occupational and rehabilitation medicine. 'Advances in Occupational Medicine and Rehabilitation'. Pavia, Pi-Me Press, 1997: 133-145.
15. Bazzini G, Capodaglio P, Panigazzi M, Grilli C, Martino MT. Tests di valutazione delia mano ipovalida dopo evento traumatico. CapitoIo del Volume: Neurofisiopatologia e Riabilitazione. Vol. 8. Roma: Marrapese Ed. 1997; pagg. 434-451.
16. Bazzini G. I test di valutazione delia mano. In: (G. Bazzini) Nuovi approcci alia riabilitazione industriale; Fondazione Clinica del Lavoro, Pavia, 1993; pgg. 55-84.
17. Bazzini G. Riabilitazione occupazionale ed ergonomia. In: (Megna G. e Calabrese S.) Riabilitazione neuromotoria 2000. Adv Rehab, PiMe Press, Pavia; pagg. 93-101.
18. Medical Research Council. Aids to the investigation of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum No.45. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London 1976.
19. Bechtol C. Grip test: the use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacing, J. Bone Joint Surg., 1954, 36A: 820-824 and 832.
20. Bazzini G. Rieducazione ergonomica mediante Lido WorkSET. Atti 2° Congresso Nazionale GISMI; Firenze, 22-23 maggio 1992; pag. 55.
21. Benaglia PG, Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Zebellin G, Sartorio F. Affidabilità e validità dell'analisi delia forza nella presa palmare e nelIe pinze in prestazioni isometriche e isocinetiche. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 1999; 21 (1): 20-24.
22. Stein RB, Walley M. Functional Comparison of Upper Extremity Amputees Myoelectric and Conventional Prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 243-248.
23. Weaver SA, Lange LR, Vogts VM. Comparison of myoelectric and conventional prostheses for adolescent amputees. Am J Occup Ther 1988, 42 (2): 87-91.
24. Davalli A, Sacchetti R, Bonivento C. Protesi mioelettriche: nuovi prototipi. Documento INAIL - Centro Protesi. Sito: www.inail.it/ medicinaeriabilitazione/
25. Sacchetti R. Nuova generazione di protesi mioelettriche. Sito Web: www.inail.it/medicinaeriabilitazione/protesi/
26. Verni G. Protesi di arto inferiore e superiore. Sito Web: www.inail.it/ medicinaeriabilitazione/protesi/
27. Davalli A, Sacchetti R. Protesi per arto superiore. Documento INAIL - Centro Protesi. Sito Web: www.inail.it/medicinaeriabilitazione/
28. Light CM, Chappell PH, Hudgins B, Engelhart K. Intelligent multifunction myoelectric control of hand prostheses. J Med Eng Technol 2002; 26 (4):139-146.
29. Light CM, Chappell PH. Development of a lightweight and adaptable multiple-axis hand prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 2000; 22 (10): 679-84.
30. Desrosiers J, Bravo G et Al. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a Measure of Dexerity of Elderly People: Reliability, Validity, and Norms Studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 751-755.
31. Fugazza G, Bazzini G, Contardi A, Gorini M, Pistarini C. Utilizzo del Minnesota rate of manipulation test e del Pennsylvania bi-manual worksample test nella valutazione ergoterapica. Atti XIX Congresso Nazionale SIMFER, Catania, ottobre 1991; pag. 534.
32. Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The Purdue Pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity, J Appl Psychol 1948, 32: 234-47.
33. Yelnik A, Bonan I et Al. Changes in the Execution of a Complex Manual Task After Ipsilateral Ischemic Cerebral Hemispheric Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 806-10.
34. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, et Al. An Objective and Standardized Test of Hand Function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 311-9.
35. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963, 185: 914-919.
36. Johansen B. Breitholtz M, Cavrini R, Johansson B, Schmidl H, Thyberg M. Prosthetic rehabilitation in bilateral high above elbow amputation. Scand J Rehab Med 1986. 19: 85-87.
37. Heller A, Wade DT et Al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987: 50: 714-9.
38. Penta M. Thonnard JL, Tesio L. ABiLHAND: A Rasch-Built Measure of Manual Ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 9: 1038-42.
39. Hildebrand KA, Patterson SD, Regan WD, MacDermid JC, King GJ. Functional outcome of semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82-A(10): 1379-86.
40. Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB, Caspard H, Grouin JM. Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1995:62(6 Suppl 1):43S-53S.
41. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
42. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?. International Disability Studies; 10: 64-67; 1988.
43. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM Version 4.0). Buffalo, New York; State University of New York, Buffalo/ U.B. Foundation Activities Inc. 1993.
44. Tesio L. Misurare la disabilità: La functional Independence Measure, uno standard internazionale. Riabil Oggi 1993; X, 8: 1-4.
45. Garrison SJ, Merritt BS. Functional outcome of quadruple amputees with end-stage renal disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 MayJun;76(3):226-30.
46. Melchiorre PJ, Findley T, Boda W. Functional Outcome and Comorbidity Indexes in the Rehabilitation of the Traumatic Versus the Vascular Unilateral Lower Limb Amputee. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75 (1): 9-14.
47. Chung-Ching Leung E, Rush PJ, Devlin M. Predicting Prosthetic Rehabilitation Outcome in Lower Limb Amputee Patients With the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 605-608.
48. Popat RA, Krebs DE et Al. Quantitative Assessment of Four Men Using Above-Elbow Prosthetic Control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 74: 720-9.
49. Kyberd PJ et Al. A simple assessment of hand function: the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). Atti Brussels International Symposium: "Advances in Objective Assessment of Hand/Upper Extremity Function and Outcome", aprile 2001, pag. 118-119.
50. Light CM, Chappel PH, Kyberd PJ. Establishing a Standardized Clinical Assessment Tool of Pathologic and Prosthetic Hand Function: Normative Data, Reliabiliy, and Validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 776-783.
51. Wright FV. Hubbard S. Jutai J. Naumann S. The Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 91-104.
52. Krebs DE. Prehension Assessment: Prosthetic Therapy for the Upper-limb Child Amputee. Thorofare NJ: Slack, 1987.
53. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards. Allen, Tex.: DLM Teaching Resources. 1983.
54. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow L, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJH. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), version 1.0. Boston, Mass.: New England Medical Center Hospitals, 1992.
55. Amdur JR, Mainland MK, Parker KCH. Diagnostic Inventory for Screening Children (D.I.S.C). Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: Kitchener-Waterloo Hospital, 1988.
56. Procter S, LeBlanc M. Clinical Evaluation of a New Design Prosthetic Prehensor. JPO 1991; 3 (2): 79.
57. Edelstein JE, Berger N. Performance Comparison Among Children Fitted With Myoelectric and Body-Powered Hands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 376-380.
58. Billock JN. Clinical Evaluation and Assessment Principles in Orthotics and Prosthetics. JPO 1996; 8 (2): 41-44.
59. Shurr DG. Practical Clinical Measures. JPO 1993; 5 (4): 131.
60. Hart DL. Orthotics and Prosthetics National Office Outcomes Tool (OPOT): Initial reliability and validity assessment for lower extremity prosthetics. JPO 1999; 11 (4): 101-117.
61. Tesio L, Perucca L, Battaglia MA, Franchignoni FP. Quality assessment of the FIM (Functional Independence Measure) ratings through Rasch analysis. Eur Med Phys 1997; 33: 69-78.
62. Sheehan TJ, DeChello LM et Al. Measuring disability: application of the Rasch model to Activities of Daily Living (ADL/IADL). J Outcome Measur 2000, 5(1): 839-863.
63. Light CM, Chappel PH, Kyberd PJ, Ellis BS. A critical review of functionality assessment in natural and prosthetic hands. Br J Occup Ther 1999; 62 (1): 7-12.
64. Deathe B, Miller WC, Speechley M. The Status of Outcome Measurement in Amputee Rehabilitation in Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 912-918.
65. Moermans JP. Functional assessment of the impaired hand. Atti Brussels International Symposium: "Advances in Objective Assessment of Hand/Upper Extremity Function and Outcome", aprile 2001; pag. 19-20.
66. Bear-Lehman J, Abreu BC. Evaluating the hand: issues in reliability and validity. Phys Ther 1989; 69 (12): 1025-1033.
67. O'Neill G. The Development of a Standardised Assessment of Hand Function. Br J Occup Ther 1995; 58 (11): 477-480.