Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 675-680

  Greenspan, David L ^a,b   Faubion, Michelle ^c   Coonrod, Dean V ^c   Hart, Kim Ward ^c   Mathieson, Kathleen ^c  

^a MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLD KNIFE CONE BIOPSY; COLPOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONE KNIFE CONE BIOPSY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HISPANIC; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PARITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COHORT STUDIES; CONIZATION; CRYOSURGERY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34548389219     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278568.29660.9b     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1054-60.
2. Whiteley PF, Olah KS. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: experience with the low-voltage diathermy loop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1272-7.
3. Mor-Yosef S, Lopes A, Pearson S, Monaghan JM. Loop diathermy cone biopsy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:884-6.
4. Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Gebhardt JA, Groshen S, Morrow CP, et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:276-82.
5. Spitzer M, Chernys AE, Seltzer VL. The use of large-loop excision of the transformation zone in an inner-city population. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:731-5.
6. Gold M, Dunton CJ, Murray J, Macones G, Hanau C, Carlson JA Jr. Loop electrocautery excisional procedure: therapeutic effectiveness as an ablation and a conization equivalent. Gynecol Oncol 1996;61:241-4.
7. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994;54:175-9.
8. Girardi F, Heydarfadai M, Koroschetz F, Pickel H, Winter R. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 1994;55:368-70.
9. Wright TC, Gagnon S, Richart RM, Ferenczy A. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:173-8.
10. Oyesanya OA, Amerasinghe C, Manning EA. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 1993;50:84-8.
11. Gonzalez DI Jr, Zahn CM, Retzloff MG, Moore WF, Kost ER, Snyder RR. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:315-21.
12. Murdoch JB, Grimshaw RN, Monaghan JM. Loop diathermy excision of the abnormal zone. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1991;1:105-111.
13. Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1.
14. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ 1980;5-338.
15. Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:996-1000.
16. Hanau CA, Bibbo M. The case for cytologic follow-up after LEEP. Acta Cytol 1997;41:731-6.
17. Murdoch JB, Morgan PR, Lopes A, Monaghan JM. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:990-3.
18. Keijser KG, Kenemans P, van der Zanden PH, Schijf CP, Vooijs GP, Rolland R. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1281-7.
19. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet 1994;343:32-4.
20. Shafi MI, Dunn JA, Buxton EJ, Finn CB, Jordan JA, Luesley DM. Abnormal cervical cytology following large loop excision of the transformation zone: a case controlled study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:145-8.
21. Naumann RW, Bell MC, Alvarez RD, Edwards RP, Partridge EE, Helm CW, et al. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization. Gynecol Oncol 1994;55:224-8.
22. Laedtke TW, Dignan M. Compliance with therapy for cervical dysplasia among women of low socioeconomic status. South Med J 1992;85:5-8.
23. McKee D. Improving the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smear results. Arch Fam Med 1997;6:574-7.
24. Paskett ED, White E, Carter WB, Chu J. Improving follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 1990;19:630-41.
25. Brooks SE, Gordon NJ, Keller SJ, Thomas SK, Chen TT, Moses G. Association of knowledge, anxiety, and fear with adherence to follow up for colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2002;6:17-22.
26. Yauger BJ, Rodriguez M, Parker MF. Default from colposcopy and loop excision electrocautery procedure appointments in a military clinic. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2005;9:78-81.
27. Behbakht K, Lynch A, Teal S, Degeest K, Massad S. Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1355-61.
28. Breitkopf CR, Catero J, Jaccard J, Berenson AB. Psychological and sociocultural perspectives on follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou results. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1347-54.
29. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:295-304.
30. Oladipo A, Ogden S, Pugh S. Preclinic appointment telephone contact: an effective intervention for colposcopy clinic nonattendance. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007;11:35-8.