Gluon condensate, Wilson loops and gauge/string duality

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Andreev, Oleg ^a,b   Zakharov, Valentin I ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK   (Germany)

^b LANDAU INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

^c INFN SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548383515     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.047705     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainstein, and V.I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B147, 385 (1979); 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1
2. M.A. Shifman A.I. Vainstein V.I. Zakharov Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B147, 448 (1979).
3. T. Banks, R. Horsley, H.R. Rubinstein, and U. Wolff, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B190, 692 (1981); 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90045-6
4. A. Di Giacomo and G.C. Rossi, Phys. Lett. B 100, 481 (1981). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90609-2
5. For a recent discussion, see P.E. Rakow, Proc. Sci. LAT2005 (2006) 284, and references therein.
6. J.M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998). 1095-0761
7. O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 323, 183 (2000). 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6
8. Equation 1 is the ansatz. This time we do not know equations that provide such a solution. As known, the equations are the condition for conformal invariance of a two-dimensional σ model. Since α′/R2 is of order 1, one needs the exact beta functions of background fields (Weyl-anomaly coefficients) rather than their leading α′ expansions. This makes the problem extremely difficult. Instead of solving it, we follow "the inverse scattering problem": first, we suggest a solution, then we look for its phenomenological relevance.
9. A. Karch, E. Katz, D.T. Son, and M.A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 74, 015005 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.015005
10. O. Andreev, Phys. Rev. D 73, 107901 (2006). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.107901
11. The sign of the exponent in 1 is different from that of. The point is that we use the Euclidean metric. The Minkowskian metric of is obtained via analytic continuation x→→ix→ together with z→iz.
12. O. Andreev and V.I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 025023 (2006). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.025023
13. N. Drukker, D.J. Gross, and H. Ooguri, Phys. Rev. D 60, 125006 (1999). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.125006
14. D. Berenstein, R. Corrado, W. Fischler, and J. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. D 59, 105023 (1999). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.105023
15. V.I. Zakharov, arXiv:hep-ph/0309178.
16. E. Eichten and K. Gottfried, Phys. Lett. B 66, 286 (1977); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(77)90882-6
17. C. Quigg and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rep. 56, 167 (1979); PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(79)90095-4
18. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K.D. Lane, and T.M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 21, 203 (1980). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.203
19. A.M. Badalian and D.S. Kuzmenko, Phys. Rev. D 65, 016004 (2001); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.016004
20. A.M. Badalian D.S. Kuzmenko Yad. Fiz. IDFZA7 0044-0027 67, 579 (2004);
21. A.M. Badalian D.S. Kuzmenko Phys. At. Nucl. PANUEO 1063-7788 67, 561 (2004). 10.1134/1.1690065
22. S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 387, 162 (1996). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00954-9