Demonstrating ecological receptor health at contaminated sites with wild rodent sperm parameters

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 459-465

  Tannenbaum, Lawrence V ^a   Thran, Brandolyn H ^a   Williams, Keith J ^b  

^a U S ARMY CENTER FOR HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE   (United States)

^b North Bay Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH STATUS; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RODENT; SPERM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGY; HEALTH STATUS; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RODENT; RODENT SPERM ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; RODENTIA; SPERMATOZOA;

RODENTIA;

EID: 34548361749     PISSN: 00904341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-006-0169-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bucci LR, Meistrich ML (1987) Effects of busulfan on murine spermatogenesis: cytotoxicity, sterility, sperm abnormalities, and dominant lethal mutations. Mutat Res 176:259-268
2. Chapin RE, Sloane RA, Haseman JK (1997) The relationships among reproductive endpoints in Swiss mice, using the Reproductive Assessment by Continuous Breeding database. Fundam Appl Toxicol 38:129-142
3. Gray LE, Marshall JO, Setzer R (1992) Correlation of ejaculated sperm numbers with fertility in the rat. Toxicologist 12:433
4. Kolluru RV (1996) Risk assessment and management, a unified approach. In: Kolluru R, Bartell SM, Pitblado RM, Stricoff RS (eds) Risk assessment and management handbook. McGraw Hill, New York, p 13-141
5. Meistrich ML, et al. (1994) Deficiency in fertilization by morphologically abnormal sperm produced by azh mutant mice. Mol Reprod Dev 37:69-77
6. Molsen MT (1996) Toxic responses of the liver. In: Klaassen CD, Amdur MO, Doul J (eds) Casarett and Doull's toxicology, the basic science of poisons. McGraw Hill, New York, p 403-409
7. Sample BE, Opresko DM, Suter GW (1996) Toxicological benchmarks for wildlife: 1996 Revision. ES/ER/TM-86/R3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
8. Tannenbaum LV (2002) Learned discourse: terrestrial ecological risk assessment: are we missing the forest for the trees? SETAC Globe 3(42):38-39
9. Tannenbaum LV (2003) Can ecological receptors really be at risk? Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:5-13
10. Tannenbaum LV, Bazar M, Hawkins M, Cornaby BW, Ferguson EA, Carroll LC, Ryan PF (2003a) Rodent sperm analysis in field-based ecological risk assessment: pilot study at Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant, Ravenna, Ohio. Environ Pollut 123:21-29
11. Tannenbaum LV, Johnson MS, Bazar M (2003b) Application of the hazard quotient method in remedial decisions: a comparison of human and ecological risk assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:387-401
12. Tannenbaum LV (2005a) A critical assessment of the ecological risk assessment process: a review of misapplied concepts. Integrated Environ Assess Manage 1:66-72
13. Tannenbaum LV (2005b) Two simple algorithms for refining mammalian receptor selection in ecological risk assessment. Integrated Environ Assess Manage 1:290-298
14. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund: process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessment. EPA 540-R-97-006. Washington, DC
15. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington, DC
16. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Guidelines for reproductive toxicity risk assessment. EPA/630/R-96-009. Washington, DC
17. Zenick H, Clegg ED, Perrault SD, Klinefelter GR, Gray LE (1994) Assessment of male reproductive toxicity, a risk assessment approach. In: Hayes AW (ed) Principles and methods of toxicology. Raven Press, Ltd., New York, p 937-988