Affective responses to exercise are dependent on intensity rather than total work

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1417-1422

  Kilpatrick, Marcus ^a   Kraemer, Robert ^b   Bartholomew, John ^c   Acevedo, Edmund ^d   Jarreau, Denise ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Arousal; Exertion; Valence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETRY; BREATHING; CALORIE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EMOTION; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; WORK;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; EXERCISE TEST; EXERTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548355242     PISSN: 01959131     EISSN: 15300315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31806ad73c     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ACEVEDO, E. O., R. R. KRAEMER, R. W. HALTOM, and J. L. TRYNIECKI. Perceptual responses proximal to the onset of blood lactate accumulation. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 43:267-273, 2003.
2. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 10:vii-x, 1978.
3. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 30:975-991, 1998.
4. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
5. BEAVER, W. L., K. WASSERMAN, and B. J. WHIPP. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J. Appl. Physiol. 60:2020-2027, 1986.
6. BIXBY, W. R., T. W. SPALDING, and B. D. HATFIELD. Temporal dynamics and dimensional specificity of the affective response to exercise of varying intensity: differing pathways to a common outcome. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 23:171-190, 2001.
7. BLANCHARD, C. M., W. M. RODGERS, P. M. WILSON, and G. J. BELL. Does equating total volume of work between two different exercise conditions matter when examining exercise-induced feeling states? Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 75:209-215, 2004.
8. BORG, G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998.
9. CABANAC, M. What is sensation? In: Biological Perspectives on Motivated Activities, R. Wong (Ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 409-428, 1995.
10. D'AMICO, E. J., T. B. NEILANDS, and R. ZAMBARANO. Power analysis for multivariate and repeated measures analysis: a flexible approach using the SPSS MANOVA procedure. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 33:479-484, 2001.
11. EKKEKAKIS, P., E. E. HALL, and S. J. PETRUZZELLO. Acute aerobic exercise and affect: current status, problems, and prospects regarding dose-response. Sports Med. 28:337-374, 1999.
12. EKKEKAKIS, P., and S. J. PETRUZZELLO. Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: iv. A conceptual case for the affect circumplex. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 3:35-63, 2002.
13. EKKEKAKIS, P., and E. O. ACEVEDO. Affective responses to acute exercise: toward a psychobiological dose-response model. In: Psychobiology of Physical Activity, E. O. Acevedo and P. Ekkekakis (Eds.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 91-110, 2006.
14. GAUVIN, L., and L. BRAWLEY. Alternative psychological models and methodologies for the study of exercise and affect. In: Exercise Psychology: The Influence of Physical Exercise on Psychological Processes, P. Seraganian (Ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 146-171, 1993.
15. HALL, E. E., P. EKKEKAKIS, and S. J. PETRUZZELLO. The affective beneficence of vigorous exercise revisited. Br. J. Health Psychol. 7:47-66, 2002.
16. HARDY, C. J., and W. J. REJESKI. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 11:304-317, 1989.
17. LEE, J. Y., B. E. JENSEN, A. OBERMAN, G. F. FLETCHER, B. J. FLETCHER, and J. M. RACZYNSKI. Adherence in the training levels comparison trial. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 28:47-52, 1996.
18. PARFITT, G., E. A. ROSE, and W. M. BURGESS. The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise. Br. J. Health Psychol. 11:39-53, 2006.
19. PATE, R. R., M. PRATT, S. N. BLAIR, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 273:402-407, 1995.
20. PERRI, M. G., S. D. ANTON, P. E. DURNING, et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol. 21:452-458, 2002.
21. RUSSELL, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39:1161-1178, 1980.
22. SVEBAK, S., and S. MURGATROYD. Metamotivational dominance: a multimethod validation of reversal theory constructs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48:107-116, 1985.
23. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1996.
24. UNITED STATES NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS. Healthy People 2000 Review, 1998-1999, Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 1999.
25. WASSERMAN, K., J. E. HANSEN, D. Y. SUE, R. CASABURI, and B. J. WHIPP. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001.