Psychometric analysis of the Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH)

Haemophilia

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 620-626

  Poonnoose, P M ^a   Thomas, R ^a   Keshava, S N ^a   Cherian, R S ^a   Padankatti, S ^a   Pazani, D ^a   Kavitha, M L ^a   Devadarasini, M ^a   Bhattacharji, S ^a   Viswabandya, A ^a   John, J A ^a   Macaden, A S ^a   Mathews, V ^a   Srivastava, A ^a  

^a CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Activities; Disability; Function; Haemophilia; Musculoskeletal; Outcome measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; BATH; CHILD; CLIMBING; CLOTHING; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FOOD INTAKE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GROOMING; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOBILIZATION; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RUNNING; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 34548348955     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2007.01508.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Poonnoose PM, Manigandan C, Thomas R et al. Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH): A new performance - based instrument to measure disability. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 598-602.
2. Pettersson H, Gilbert M. Diagnostic Imaging in Haemophilia. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 56-65.
3. Rodriguez-Merchan EC, de la Corte H. Musculoskeletal outcomes research in haemophilia. In: Rodriguez-Merchan EC, ed. The Haemophilic Joints. New Perspectives Chapter 7. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003: 36-44.
4. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiological classification of haemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 149: 153-9.
5. Poonnoose PM, Srivastava A. Functional assessment of haemophilic arthropathy - an international perspective. Semin Haematol 2006; 43 (Suppl. 1): S27-32.
6. Manco-Johnson MJ, Nuss R, Funk S, Murphy J. Joint evaluation instruments for children and adults with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 649-57.
7. Manco-Johnson MJ, Funk SM. Joint evaluation instruments in haemophilia. In: Rodriguez-Merchan EC, ed. The Haemophilic Joints. New Perspectives Chapter 8. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003: 45-55.
8. Manco-Johnson MJ, Pettersson H, Petrini P et al. Physical therapy and imaging outcome measures in a haemophilia population treated with factor prophylaxis: Current status and future directions. Haemophilia 2004; 10 (Suppl. 4): 88-93.
9. Van Genderen FR, Van Meeteren NLU, Van Der Bom JG et al. Functional consequences of haemophilia in adults: The development of the Haemophilia Activities List. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 565-71.
10. WHO ICIDH-2 International classification of functioning and disability; Beta-2 Draft Full Version Assessment. Classification and Epidemiology group WHO/HSC/ACE/99.1. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1999: 1-214.
11. Beeton K, de Kleijn P, Hilliard P et al. Recent developments in clinimetric instruments. Haemophilia 2006; 12 (Suppl. 3): 102-7.
12. Hoeymans N, Wouters ER, Feskens EJ et al. Reproducibility of performance-based and self-reported measures of functional status. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997; 52A: 363-8.
13. Solovieva S. Clinical severity of disease, functional disability and health-related quality of life. Three-year follow-up study of 150 Finnish patients with coagulation disorders. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 53-63.
14. Schick M, Stucki G, Rodriguez M et al. Haemophilic arthropathy: assessment of quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18: 468-72.
15. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988; 1: 95-108.
16. Fischer K, van der Bom JG, Molho P et al. Prophylactic versus on-demand treatment strategies for severe haemophilia: A comparison of costs and long-term outcome. Haemophilia 2002; 8: 745-52.
17. Aledort LM, Haschmeyer RH, Pettersson H. Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group: A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 391-9.
18. Nilsson IM, Berntorp E, Lofqvist T, Pettersson H. Twenty-five years experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B. J Intern Med 1992; 232: 25-32.
19. Astermark J, Petrini P, Tengborn L, Schulman S, Ljung R, Berntop E. Primary prophylaxis in severe haemophilia should be started at an early age but can be individualized. Br J Haematol 1999; 105: 1109-13.
20. Fischer K, Van Den Berg HM, Thomas R et al. Dose and outcome of care in haemophilia - how do we define cost - effectiveness? Haemophilia 2004; 10 (Suppl. 4): 216-20.
21. De Kleijn P, Heijnen L, van Meeteren NLU. Clinimetric instruments to assess functional health status in patients with haemophilia: A literature review. Haemophilia 2002; 8: 419-27.
22. De Kleijn P, Van Genderen FR, Van Meeteren NLU. Assessing functional health status in adults with haemophilia: Towards a preliminary core set of clinimetric instruments based on a literature search in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 308-18.
23. Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, Carr DB. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine 2003; 28: 2407-13.
24. Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehab 1992; 2: 157-68.
25. Van Genderen FR, Westers P, Heijnen L et al. Measuring patients perceptions on their functional abilities: Validation of the Haemophilia Activities List. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 36-46.
26. Bruyere O, Honore A, Rovati LC et al. Radiologic features poorly predict clinical outcome in knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Rhuematol 2002; 31: 13-6.