Does Public Management Reform Change Administrative Systems?;La réforme de la gestion publique change-t-elle les systèmes administratifs?

Revue Francaise d'Administration Publique

Volumn 105-106, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 39-54

  Bouckaert, Geert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548325459     PISSN: 01527401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/rfap.105.0039     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Thompson (J.), « Reinvention as Reform : Assessing the National Performance Review », Public Administration Review, nov.-dec. 2000, vol. 60, no 6, p. 508-521.
2. Barzelay (M.), The New Public Management. Improving Research and Policy Dialogue, Los Angeles, Californie, University of California Press, 2001, 218 p.
3. Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.), Public Management Reform : an International Comparison, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.
4. Thompson (J.), op. cit.
5. Rieder (S.) et Lehmann (L.), « Evaluation of New Public Management Reforms in Switzerland : Empirical Results and Reflections on Methodology », International Public Management Review, 2001, vol. 2 (2), p. 25-43.
6. Peters (B.-G.), The Future of Governing : Four Emerging Models, Lawrence, University Press of Kansas, 1996.
7. Bouckaert (G.), « Renewing Public Leadership : the Context for Public Service Delivery Reform », in : Finlay (J.) et Debicki (M.), Delivering Public Services in CEE Countries : Trends and Developments, NISPAcee, Bratislava, 2003, p. 15-26.
8. OCDE, Modern Budgeting, Paris, OCDE, 1997.
9. Algemene (R.), Informatievoorziening en Kentgetallen, La Haye (Fourniture de l'information et indicateurs de performance), 1997.
10. Congress of the United States, « Toward a Smaller, Smarter, Common Sense Government : the Results Act : It's the Law », Washington DC Congress, 1997.
11. Radin (B.), « The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) : Hydra-Headed Monster or Flexible Management Tool ? », Public Administration Review, 58 (4), July/August 1998, p. 307-316.
12. Treasory Board Secretariat, Evaluation Report : Improved Reporting to Parliament Performance Report, Ottawa, TBS, 1996.
13. The Council for Excellence in Government, America Unplugged : Citizens and their Government, Washington DC, 1999.
14. Hirschman (A.), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty : Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, Cambridge, MA : Havard University Press, 1970.
15. Bouckaert (G.), « Remodeling Quality in a Management Context », in : Halachmi (A.) et Bouckaert (G.), Public Productivity through Quality and Strategic Management, IOS Press, 1995.
16. Zeithaml (V.), Parasuraman (A.) et Berry (L.), Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations, Londres, The Free Press, 1990.
17. Crozier (M.), Huntington (S.) et Watanuki (J.), The Crisis of Democraty, New York, University Press, 1975.
18. Inglehart (R.), « Postmodernization Erodes Respect for Authority, but Increases Support for Democracy », in : Pippa (N.) (ed.), Critical Citizens : Global Support for Democratic Governance, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999;
19. Stompka (P.), Trust : a Sociological Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
20. Zussman (D.), « Do Citizens Trust their Government », Canadian Public Administration, 40 (2), 1997, p. 234-254.
21. Hardin (R.), « Trust in the Government », in : Braithwaite (V.) et Levi (M.) (eds.), Trust and Governance, New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1998.
22. Easton (D.), « A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support », British Journal of Political Science, 1975, 5 (4), p. 434-457.
23. OCDE, Internal Markets, MTM paper no 6, Paris, OCDE, 1993.
24. Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.), op. cit.
25. OCDE, Performance Management in Government : Performance Measurement and Result-Oriented Management, Occasional papers, no 3, OCDE, PUMA, Paris, 1994.
26. Bouckaert (G.) et Peters (B.-G.), « Performance Measurement and Management : the Achille'Heel in Administrative Modernization », Public Performance and Management Review, Londres, Sage, 25 (2002) 4, p. 359-362.
27. Christensen (T.) et Laegreid (P.) (eds.), New Public Management : the Transformation of Idea and Practice, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2001.
28. Pollitt (C.), Bathgate (K.), Caulfield (J.), Smullen (A.), Talbot (C.), « Agency Fever ? Analysis of an International Fashion », Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis : Research and Practice, 2001, no 3, p. 271-290.
29. Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.), « Evaluating Public Management Reforms : an International Perspective », in : Hellmut (Ed.), Evaluation in Public Sector Reform : Concepts and Practices in International Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK, 2003, p. 12-35.
30. Christensen (T.) et Laegreid (P.), op. cit. ; Wollmann (H.) (ed.), Evaluation in Public Sector Reform : Concepts and Practices in International Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2003.
31. Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.), op. cit..
32. Klages (H.), « Quality Improvement in German Local Government », in : Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.) (eds.), Quality Improvement in European Public Services, Concepts, Cases and Commentary, Londres, Sage, 1995;
33. Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.), Quality Improvement in European Public Services, Concepts, Cases and Commentary, Londres, Sage, 1995, 190 p.
34. Bouckaert (G.), « Charters as Frameworks for Awarding Quality : the Belgian, British and French Experience », in : Hill (H.) et Klages (H.) (eds.), Trend in Public Sector Renewal, Recent Developments and Concepts of Awarding Excellence, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Beiträge zur Politikwissenschaft, Band 58, Peter Lang, Francfort, 1995, p. 185-200.
35. Pollitt (C.) et Bouckaert (G.), Public Management Reform : an International Comparison, Oxford, Oxford University Press, à paraître.