Are pre-spraying growing conditions a major determinant of herbicide efficacy?

Weed Research

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 415-424

  Riethmuller Haage, I ^a,c   Bastiaans, L ^a   Kempenaar, C ^a   Smutny, V ^b   Kropff, M J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

^c NONE   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Brassica napus; Chenopodium album; Dose response curve; Persicaria maculosa; Senecio vulgaris; Solanum nigrum; Uptake; Weather conditions

Indexed keywords

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GROWTH RATE; GROWTH RESPONSE; HERBICIDE; LEAF AREA; RELATIVE HUMIDITY; SPRAY; WEATHER; WEED;

BRASSICA NAPUS; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; PERSICARIA; SENECIO; SENECIO VULGARIS; SOLANUM NIGRUM;

EID: 34548309222     PISSN: 00431737     EISSN: 13653180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00584.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baker EA (1980) Effect of cuticular components on foliar penetration. Pesticide Science 11, 367 370.
2. Caseley JC (1987) Effects of weather on herbicide activity. In:Proceedings 1987 Eighth Australian Weed Conference, Sydney, Australia, 386 395.
3. Caseley JC (1989) Variations in foliar performance attributable to humidity, dew and rain effects. Aspects of Applied Biology 21, 215 225.
4. Christensen S, Streibig JC Haas H (1990) Interaction between herbicide activity and weed suppression by spring barley varieties. In:Proceedings 1990 EWRS, Helsinki, Finland, 367 374.
5. Collings LV, Blair AM, Gay AP, Dyer CJ Mackay N (2003) The effect of weather factors on the performance of herbicides to control Alopecurus myosuroides in winter wheat. Weed Science 43, 146 153.
6. Coupland D (1989) Pre-treatment environmental effects on the uptake, translocation, metabolism and performance of fluzifop-butyl in Elymus repens. Weed Res. 29, 289 297.
7. De Ruiter H Meinen E (1998) Influence of water stress and surfactant on the efficacy, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Science 46, 289 296.
8. De Ruiter H, Uffing AJ van Dijk N (1999) The influence of growth stage of weeds on the glyphosate dose needed. In:Proceedings 1999 British Crop Protection Council, Brighton, UK, 615 620.
9. Devine MD (1989) Phloem translocation of herbicides. Review of Weed Science 4, 191 213.
10. EPA (2004) Pesticide Market Estimates: Usage 2000-2001. Available at: http://www.epa.gov.
11. Green J Strek H (2001) Influence of weather on the performance of acetolactate synthase inhibitor herbicides. In:Proceedings 2001 Brighton Crop Protection - Weeds, Brighton, UK.
12. Hammerton JL (1967) Environmental factors and susceptibility to herbicides. Weeds 15, 330 336.
13. Harker KN Blackshaw RE (2003) Leaf extension rate may help determine when low wild oat herbicide rates will be effective. Weed Technology 17, 829 835.
14. Hughes AP (1973) Comparison of effects of light-intensity and duration on Chrysanthemum morifolium Cv Bright-Golden-Anne in controlled environments.1. Growth analysis. Annals of Botany 37, 267 274.
15. Kempenaar C, Groeneveld RM, Uffing AJ Weide Ryvd (2002) New insights and developments in the MLHD-concept of weed control. In:Proceedings 2002 EWRS, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 98 99.
16. Ketel DH (1996) Effect of low doses of metamitron and glyphosate on growth and chlorophyll content of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Science 44, 1 6.
17. Kudsk P (1989) Experiences with reduced herbicide doses in Denmark and the development of the concept of factor-adjusted doses. In:Proceedings 1989 Brighton Crop Protection - Weeds, Brighton, UK, 545 554.
18. Kudsk P Kristensen JL (1992) Effect of environmental factors on herbicide performance. In:Proceedings 1992 First International Weed Control Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 173 186.
19. Kudsk P Streibig JC (2003) Herbicides - a two-edged sword. Weed Research 43, 90 102.
20. Lundkvist A (1997a) Influence of weather on the efficacy of dichlorprop-P/MCPA and tribenuron-methyl. Weed Research 37, 361 371.
21. Lundkvist A (1997b) Predicting optimal application time for herbicides from estimated growth rate of weeds. Agricultural Systems 54, 223 242.
22. Madafiglio GP, Meed RW, Cornish PS De Ven RV (2006) Seed production of Raphanus raphanistrum following herbicide application during reproduction and effects on wheat yield. Weed Research 46, 50 60.
23. Maier CGA Post-Beittenmiller D (1998) Epicuticular wax on leek in vitro development stages and seedlings under varied growth conditions. Plant Science 134, 53 67.
24. Merritt CR (1984) Influence of environmental factors on the activity of ioxynil salt and ester applied to Stellaria media. Weed Research 24, 173 182.
25. Mummigatti U, Chetti M Nawalagatti C (1995) Influence of growth conditions and the efficacy of herbicides on growth and development of Chormolaena. In:Proceedings 1995 Fourth International Workshop on Biological Control and Management of Chormolaena odorata, Bangalore, India.
26. Nobel P (1976) Photosynthetic rates of sun versus shade leaves of Hyptis emoryi. Plant Physiology 58, 218 223.
27. Peterson DE (2001) Herbicide mode of action. Kansas State University Agricultural, Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Available at: http://www.oznet.ksu.edu 2002.
28. Poorter H Van der Werf A (1998) Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species. In:Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences (eds H Lambers, H Poorter MMI Van Vuuren 309 336. Backhuys, Leiden, the Netherlands.
29. Powles S Critchley C (1980) Effect of light intensity during growth on photoinhibition of intact attached bean leaflets. Plant Physiology 65, 1181 1187.
30. Seefeldt SS, Jensen JE Fuerst EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technology 9, 218 227.
31. Streibig JC (1992) Quantitative assessment of herbicide phytotoxicity with dilution assay, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
32. Streibig JC, Jensen JE, Olofsdotter M et al. (1993) Testing hypotheses with dose-response curves. In:Proceedings 1993 EWRS, Braunschweig, Germany, 423 431.