Precision, consistency, and reproducibility of blood pressure in diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancy: The appraisal of repeated measurements

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1063-1070

  Lauszus, Finn Friis ^a,b,c   Rosgaard, Anni ^a   Lousen, Thea ^b   Rasmussen, Ole Winther ^b   Klebe, Thomas Martin ^b   Klebe, Joachim G ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ^*  (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c HERNING HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Pregnancy; Repeated measurement; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSCILLOMETRY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPHYGMOMANOMETRY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; OSCILLOMETRY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS;

EID: 34548309198     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340701472773     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brown MA, Bowyer L, McHugh L, Davis GK, Mangos GJ, Jones M. Twenty-four-hour automated blood pressure monitoring as a predictor of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:618-22.
2. Flores L, Levy I, Aquilera E, Martinez S, Gomis R, Estmatjes E. Usefulness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1507-11.
3. Penny JA, Halligan AW, Shennan AH, Lambert PC, Jones DR, de Swiet M, et al. Automated, ambulatory or conventional blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: which is the better predictor of severe hypertension? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:521-6.
4. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojon A, Fernandez JR, Alonso I, Aguilar MF, et al. Differences in circadian blood pressure variability during gestation between healthy and complicated pregnancies. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:200-8.
5. Peek M, Shennan A, Halligan A, Lambert PC, Taylor DJ, De Swiet M. Hypertension in pregnancy: which method of blood pressure measurement is most predictive of outcome? Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:1030-3.
6. Glavind-Kristensen M, Petersen OB, Forman A. Effects of ouabain on the isolated human uteroplacental vasculature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:892-8.
7. Petersen OB, Skajaa K, Svane D, Gregersen H, Forman A. The effects of dihydralazine, labetalol and magnesium sulphate on the isolated, perfused human placental cotyledon. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:871-8.
8. Cugini P, Di Palma L, Battisti P, Leone G, Pachi A, Paesano R, et al. Describing and interpreting 24-hour blood pressure patterns in physiologic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(1 Pt1):54-60.
9. Napoli A, DiBiase N, Mazziotti F, Marceca M, Sabbatini A, Fallucca F. Blood pressure monitoring in diabetic pregnancy. Ann Ist Super Sanitá. 1997;33:337-41.
10. Ekbom P, Damm P, Nørgaard K, Clausen P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Feldt-Rasmussen B, et al. Urinary albumin excretion and 24-hour blood pressure as predictors of preeclampsia in Type I diabetes. Diabetologia. 2000;43:927-31.
11. Lauszus FF, Rasmussen OW, Lousen T, Klebe TM, Klebe JG. Ambulatory blood pressure as predictor of preeclampsia in diabetic pregnancies with respect to urinary albumin excretion rate and glycemic regulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1096-103.
12. Shennan AH, Kissane J, deSwiet M. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:904-8.
13. Shennan A, Halligan A, Gupta M, Taylor D, deSwiet M. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements in severe preeclampsia: Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;106:171-3.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307-10.
15. O'Brien E, Sheridan J, Browne T, Conroy R, O'Malley K. Validation of the Spacelabs 90202 ambulatory blood pressure recorder. J Hypertens. 1988;7(suppl 6):S388-9.
16. O'Brien E, O'Malley K, Sheridan J. The need for a standardized protocol for validating non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens Suppl. 1989;7:S19-20.
17. Santucci S, Steiner D, Zimbler M, James GD, Pichkering TG. Validation study of the Spacelabs models 90202 and 5200 ambulatory blood pressure monitors. J Ambulat Monit. 1988;1:211-6.
18. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Halligan A, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J Hypertens Suppl. 1993;11(suppl 5):S282-3.
19. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1990; 336:1465-8.
20. Hansen KW. Ambulatory blood pressure in insulin-dependent diabetes: the relation to stages of diabetic kidney disease. J Diabetes Compl. 1996;10:331-51.
21. Van Ittersum FJ, Wijering RMJ, Lambert J, Donker AJM, Stehower CDA. Determinants of the limits of agreement between the sphygmomanometer and the SpaceLabs 90207 device for blood pressure measurement in healthy volunteers and insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1125-30.
22. Higgins JR, Walshe JJ, Halligan A, O'Brien E, Conroy R, Darling MRN. Can 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement predict the development of hypertension in primigravidae? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:356-62.
23. Kyle PM, Clark SJ, Buckley D, Kissane J, Coats AJS, de Swiet M, et al. Second trimester ambulatory blood pressure in nulliparous pregnancy: a useful screening test for preeclampsia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:914-9.
24. Ohkubo T, Asayama K, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Hoshi H, Hashimoto J, et al. Ohasama Study. How many times should blood pressure be measured at home for better prediction of stroke risk? Ten-year follow-up results from the Ohasama Study. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1099-104.