Tolerance of cotton expressing a 2,4-D detoxification gene to 2,4-D applied in the field

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 780-787

  Charles, Graham W ^a   Constable, Greg A ^b   Llewellyn, Danny J ^b   Hickman, Mark A ^c  

^a NSW DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Genetically modified organism; Herbicide resistance; MCPA; Transgenic

Indexed keywords

COTTON; DETOXIFICATION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; GROWTH RATE; HERBICIDE; TOLERANCE; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 34548299680     PISSN: 00049409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AR06375     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Al-Khatib K, Mink GI, Reisenauer G, Parker R, Westberg H, Lamb B (1993) Development of a biologically-based system for detection and tracking of airborne herbicides. Weed Technology 7, 404-410.
2. Baker RS (1993) Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to preplant-applied hormone-type herbicides. Weed Technology 7, 150-153.
3. Banks PA, Schroeder J (2002) Carrier volume affects herbicide activity in simulated spray drift studies. Weed Technology 16, 833-837. doi: 10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0833:CVAHAI]2.0.CO;2
4. Bayley C, Trolinder N, Ray C, Morgan M, Quisenberry JE, Ow DW (1992) Engineering 2,4-D resistance into cotton. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83, 645-649. doi: 10.1007/BF00226910
5. Birch P (2004) Understanding hormone damage. The Australian Cottongrower 25, 29-31.
6. Chen ZX, Llewellyn DJ, Fan YL, Li SJ, Guo SD, Jiao GL, Zhao JX (1994) 2,4-D resistant cotton plants produced by Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 27, 31-37.
7. Ellis JM, Griffin JL, Jones CA (2002) Effect of carrier volume on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technology 16, 587-592. doi: 10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0587:EOCVOC]2.0.CO;2
8. Hammond D (1992) Managing 2,4-D in cotton fallows. The Australian Cottongrower 13, 67.
9. Horowitz M, Herzlinger G, Gizmawi I (1976) Biological methods for detection and estimation of damage to cotton by 2,4-D. Phytoparasitica 4, 144.
10. Llewellyn D, Fitt G (1996) Pollen dispersal from two field trials of transgenic cotton in the Namoi Valley, Australia. Molecular Breeding 2, 157-166. doi: 10.1007/BF00441430
11. Llewellyn D, Tyson C, Constable G, Duggan B, Beale S, Steel P (2007) Containment of regulated genetically modified cotton in the field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment (In press).
12. Lyon BR, Cousins YL, Llewellyn DJ, Dennis ES (1993) Cotton plants transformed with a bacterial degradation gene are protected from accidental spray drift damage by the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Transgenic Research 2, 162-169. doi: 10.1007/BF01972610
13. Martin RJ, McMillan MG, Cook JB (1988) Survey of farm management practices of the northern wheat belt of New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 499-509. doi: 10.1071/EA9880499
14. Medd D, McMillan M (1992) Cotton weed identification and control. The Australian Cottongrower 13, 80-81.
15. Porter WK, Thomas CH, Baker JB (1959) A three-year study of the effect of some phenoxy herbicides on cotton. Weeds 7, 341-348.
16. Staten G (1946) Contamination of cotton fields by 2,4-D or hormone type weed sprays. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 38, 536-544.
17. Storrie A, Hickman M, Cook T, Alston C (1998) The effect of low rates of fallow herbicides on cotton. The Australian Cottongrower 19, 9-13.
18. Zhang BH, Wang HM, Liu YH, Liu ZD (2001) In vitro assay for 2,4-D resistance in transgenic cotton. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology 37, 300-304.