A novel index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability after primary angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction: Comparison with FDG-PET imaging

Korean Circulation Journal

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 318-326

  Lim, Hong Seok ^a   Tahk, Seung Jea ^a   Yoon, Myeong Ho ^a   Woo, Soung Iil ^a   Choi, Woon Jung ^a   Hwang, Jung Won ^a   Li, Dong Hao ^a   Seo, Kyoung Woo ^a   Park, Jin Sun ^a   Kim, Jin Woo ^a   Kang, Soo Jin ^a   Choi, Byoung Joo ^a   Choi, So Yeon ^a   Hwang, Gyo Seung ^a   Shin, Joon Han ^a  

^a Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Myocardial infarction; Positron emmission tomography; Pressure; Viability

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; HEPARIN; TICLOPIDINE;

ACCURACY; ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG UPTAKE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSOR;

EID: 34548293290     PISSN: 17385520     EISSN: 17385555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2007.37.7.318     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bonow RO. Identification of viable myocardium. Circulation 1996;94:2674-80.
2. Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, et al. Lack of myocardial reperfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: a predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992;85:1699-705.
3. Maes A, van de Werf F, Nuyts J, Bormans G, Desmet W, Mortemans L. Impaired myocardial tissue perfusion early after successful thrombolysis: impact on myocardial flow, metabolism, and junction at late follow-up. Circulation 1995;92:2072-8.
4. Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Choi SY, et al. Microvascular integrity and ventricular function according to early ST-segment resolution in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 2003;33:183-95.
5. Choi SY, Tahk SJ, Yoon MH, et al. Comparison of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade with coronary flow reserve for prediction of recovery of LV function and LV remodeling in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 2004;34:247-57.
6. Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Choi SY, et al. Effect of distal protection device on the microvascular integrity during primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: distal protection device in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 2005;35-106-14.
7. Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Cosgrove DM, et al. Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims database. Circulation 1993;87:1489-97.
8. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation 2000;101:125-30.
9. Kern MJ. Coronary physiology revisited: practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 2000;101: 1344-51.
10. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation 2001;104:2003-6.
11. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation 2002; 105:2482-6.
12. Fearon WF, Farouque HM, Balsam LB, et al. Comparison of coronary thermodilution and Doppler velocity for assessing coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2003;108:2198-200.
13. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129-32.
14. Yamamoto K, Ito H, Iwakura K, et al. Pressure-derived collateral flow index as a parameter of microvascular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1383-9.
15. Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Choi SY, et al. Comparison between microvascular integrity indexes assessed by pressure/doppler wire and %FDG uptake in AMI following primary PCI. Korean Circ J 2006;36:701-9.
16. Saha GB, MacIntyre WJ, Brunken RC, et al. Present assessment of myocardial viability by nuclear imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1996; 26:315-35.
17. Udelson JE. Steps forward in the assessment of myocardial viability in left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1998;97:833-8.
18. Topol EJ. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders: 2003. p.832-3.
19. Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA. Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:587-92.
20. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:535-43.
21. Segall G. Assessment of myocardial viability by positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:323-30.
22. Teiger E, Garot J, Aptecar E, et al. Coronary blood flow reserve and wall motion recovery in patients undergoing angioplasty after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1999;20:285-92.
23. Lepper W, Hoffmann R, Kamp O, et al. Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:2368-74.
24. Bax M, de Winter RJ, Schotborgh CE, et al. Short- and long-term recovery of left ventricular junction predicted at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:534-41.
25. de Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NH, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1996;94:1842-9.
26. Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2006;113: 2054-61.
27. Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, Koch KT, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;285:H2194-200.
28. Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, et al. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation 2004;110:2137-42.
29. Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, et al. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation 2004;109:2269-72.
30. Shimada K, Saknoue Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability using coronary zero flow pressure after successful angioplasty in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. Heart 2003;89:71-6.