Comparison of internet-based and paper-based questionnaires in Taiwan using multisample invariance approach

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 501-507

  Yu, Sen Chi ^a   Yu, Min Ning ^b  

^a HUAFAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES DEPRESSION SCALE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; E-MAIL; HUMAN; INTERNET; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TAIWAN;

DEPRESSION; HUMANS; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PAPER; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH; TAIWAN;

EID: 34548285417     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9998     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. CyberPsychology & Behavior 6:73-80.
2. Couper, M.P. (2000). Web survey: a review of issue and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly 64:464-495.
3. Birnbaum, M.H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology 55:803-822.
4. Kaplowitz, M.D., Hadlock, T.D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 68:94-101.
5. Find.org. (2005). Internet users in Taiwan. Available at: http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=134. Accessed July 29, 2006.
6. nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
7. Jöreskong, K.G., & Sörborm, D. (1993). LISERAL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
8. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9. Buchanan, T., & Smith, J.L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology 90:125-144.
10. Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Breithaupt, K., & Zumbo, B.D. (2002). Sample invariance of the structural equation model and the item response model: a case study. Structural Equation Modeling 9:390-412.
12. Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1:385-401.
13. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternatives ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K.A., & Long, J.S. (eds.) Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp.136-162.
14. Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: a simplified methodology. Available at: http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm. Accessed November 31, 2005.
15. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112:155-159.