The powerful seductions alchemy

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 293-297

  Berk, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548272153     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-007-9035-z     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Barnett, V. (1999). Comparative Statistical Inference (3rd Edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Berk, R. A., Bickel, P., Campbell, K., Keller-McNulty, S., & Sachs, J. (2002). Workshop on statistical approaches for the evaluation of complex computer models. Statistical Science, 17, 173-192.
3. Berk, R. A. (2003). Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
4. Berk, R. A., & de Leeuw, J. (1999). An evaluation of California's inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1045-1052.
5. Berk, R. A., Kriegler, B., & Baek, J.-H. (2006). Forecasting dangerous inmate misconduct: An application of ensemble statistical procedures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(2), 131-145.
6. Berk, R. A., Ladd, H., Graziano, H., & Baek, J.-H. (2003). A randomized experiment testing inmate classification systems. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(2), 215-242.
7. Freedman, D. B. (1995). Some issues in the foundation of statistics. Foundations of Science, 1, 19-83.
8. Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment: A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies. New York: Praeger.
9. Rubin, D. B. (1984). Bayesian justifiability and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. Annals of Statistics, 12(4), 1151-1172.