Color preference, color naturalness, and annoyance of compressed and color scaled digital videos

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6492, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Koh, Chin Chye ^a   Foley, John M ^b   Mitra, Sanjit K ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chroma scaling; Color naturalness; Color preference; Logistic function; MPEG 2 compression; Overall annoyance; Psychophysical experiment

Indexed keywords

IMAGE COMPRESSION; IMAGE QUALITY; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CHROMA SCALING; COLOR NATURALNESS; COLOR PREFERENCE; LOGISTIC FUNCTIONS; MPEG-2 COMPRESSION; OVERALL ANNOYANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENT;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 34548272006     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.704810     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. C. Fenimore, J. Libert, and S. Wolf, "Perceptual effects of noise in digital video compression," SMPTE Technical Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 178-187, March 2000.
2. E. Fedorovskaya, H. de Ridder, and F. Blommaert, "Chroma variations and perceived quality of color images of natural scenes," Color Research and Application, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 96-110, April 1997.
3. C.C. Koh, J.M. Foley, and S.K. Mitra, "Color preference and perceived color naturalness of digital videos," SPIE Proc: HVEI XI, vol. 6057, pp. 257-267, San Jose, CA, January, 2006.
4. ITU-R Recommendation BT.601-5, "Studio encoding parameters of digital television for standard 4:3 and widescreen 16:9 aspect ratios, 1995.
5. Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG), http://www.vqeg.org.
6. MPEG software simulation group, http://www.mpeg.org/MPEG/MSSG.
7. G. Wyszecki and W.S. Styles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982.
8. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11, "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," 2002.
9. B. Girod, "What's wrong with mean-squared error", Digital Images and Human Vision, A.B. Watson (Ed.), pp. 207-220, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
10. M.S. Moore, "Psychophysical measurement and prediction of digital video quality," Ph.D. Dissertation, June 2002, University of California Santa Barbara.
11. M.C.Q. Farias, "No-Reference and Reduced Reference Video Quality Metrics: New Contributions," Ph.D. Dissertation, September 2004, University of California Santa Barbara.
12. C.C. Koh, J.M. Foley, S.K. Mitra, and I.E.J. Heynderickx, "Annoyance of individual artifacts in MPEG-2 compressed video and their relation to overall annoyance," SPIE Proc: HVEIX, vol. 5666, pp. 595-606, San Jose, CA, January, 2005.
13. S.E. Maxwell and H.D. Delaney, Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1990.e
14. I. A. Trujillo-Ortiz, R. Hernandez-Walls, and F.A. Trujillo-Perez. (2006). RMAOV33: Three-way Analysis of Variance With Repeated Measures on Three Factors Test. A MATLAB file. [WWW document]. http://www.mathworks.com/ matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do ?obiectld=9638
15. J.E. Caviedes, F. Oberti, "No-reference quality metric for degraded and enhanced video," SPIE Proc: VCIP, vol. 5150, pp. 621-632, June 2003.