Statistical inference and meta-analysis

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 247-270

  Berk, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence intervals; Hypothesis tests; Meta analysis; Statistical inference

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548255918     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-007-9036-y     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Amemiya, T. (1978). A note on a random coefficients model. International Economics Review, 19(3), 793-796.
2. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651-680.
3. Barnett, V. (1999). Comparative statistical inference (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
4. Berk, R. A. (2003). Regression analysis: A constructive critique. Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
5. Berk, R. A., Western, B., & Weiss, R. (1995). Statistical Inference for Apparent Populations (with commentary) Sociological methodology (vol. 25). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
6. Berk, R. A., & Freedman, D. A. (2003). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In T. G. Blomberg & S. Cohen (Eds.), Punishment and social control: Essays in honor of Sheldon Messinger (2nd ed., pp. 235-254). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
7. Bickel, P. J., & Doksum, K. A. (2001). Mathematical statistics: Basic ideas and selected topics, volume 1 (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
8. Bond, C. F., Wiitala, W. L., & Richard, F. D. (2003). Meta-analysis of raw mean differences. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 406-418.
9. Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 791-799.
10. Briggs, D. C. (2005). Meta-analysis: A case study. Evaluation Review, 29, 87-127.
11. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconomics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. de Leeuw, J. (1994). Statistics and the Sciences. In I. Borg & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Trends and perspectives in empirical social science. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
13. Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation modeling. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14. Duncan, O. D. (1984). Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical. New York: Academic Press.
15. Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1971). Limiting the risk of Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators. Part I: The Bayes case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 807-815.
16. Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1972). Limiting the risk of Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators. Part II: The empirical Bayes case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 130-139.
17. Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1973). Combining possibly related estimation problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 35, 379-421. (with discussion)
18. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
19. Freedman, D. A. (1987). As others see us: A case study in path analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 101-223. (with discussion)
20. Freedman, D. A. (2004). Graphical models for causation and the identification problem. Evaluation Review, 28, 267-293.
21. Freedman, D. A. (2005). Statistical models: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Froehlich, B. R. (1973). Some estimators for random coefficient regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(342), 329-335.
23. Glass, G. V., McGraw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
24. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.
25. Glaser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Statistically dependent effects. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26. Greenhouse, J.B., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Hedges L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
28. Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
30. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
31. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Koch, G. G. (1967). A procedure to estimate the population mean in random effects models. Technometrics, 9(4), 577-585.
33. Kriskal, W. (1988). Miracles and statistics: The casual assumption of independence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(404), 929-940.
34. Leamer, E. E. (1978). Specification searches: Ad Hoc inference with non-experimental data. New York: John Wiley.
35. Lewis, T. A., & Zelterman, D. (1994). Bayesian approaches to research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36. Lieberson, S. (1985). Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Lipsey, M. W. (1997). What can you build with thousands of bricks? musings on the cumulation of knowledge in program evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 76(Winter), 7-24.
39. Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analysis inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. C. Cook, D. S. Cooper, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. I. Light, T. A. Loomis & F. M. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
40. Maddala, G. S. (1977). Econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill.
41. Manski, C. F. (1990). Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. American Economics Review Papers and Proceedings, 80, 319-323.
42. Maritz, J. S., & Lwin, T. (1989). Empirical Bayes methods (2nd ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.
43. Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439-466.
44. Neyman, J. [1923] (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Translated and edited by D. M. Dabrowska & T.P. Speed, Statistical Science, 5, 465-471.
45. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley.
46. Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1976). Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw Hill.
47. Porter, T., & Ross, D. (2003). The Cambridge history of science, volume 7: The modern social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Raudenbush, S. W., Becker, B. J., & Kalaian, H. (1988). Modeling multivariate effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 1110-120.
49. Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
50. Robbins, H. (1956). An empirical Bayes approach to statistics. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 157-163). University of California Press.
51. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
52. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Sage Foundation.
53. Rubin, D. B. (1986). Which ifs have causal answers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961-962.
54. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55. Thompson, S. (2002). Sampling (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
56. Wachter, K. W. (1988). Disturbed about meta-analysis? Science, 241, 1407-1408.
57. Wortman, P. M. (1994). Judging research quality. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.