Facilitating clinician adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit: A multicenter, qualitative study

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 2083-2089

  Sinuff, Tasnim ^a,b   Cook, Deborah ^c   Giacomini, Mita ^c,d   Heyland, Daren ^e   Dodek, Peter ^f  

^a Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Critical care; Practice guidelines; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERVIEW; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE; OCCUPATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPIRATORY THERAPIST;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CANADA; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERVIEWS; PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES;

EID: 34548252402     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000281446.15342.74     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cook DJ, Meade M, Hand L, et al: Toward understanding evidence uptake: Semirecumbency for pneumonia prevention. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1472-1477
2. Sinuff T, Kahnamoui K, Cook D, et al: Practice guidelines as multipurpose tools: A qualitative study of noninvasive ventilation. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:776-782
3. Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Second Edition. London, Sage Publications, 1998, pp 3-241
4. Glaser BG: Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1978
5. Glaser BG: Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1998
6. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al: Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282:1458-1465
7. Patton M: Designing qualitative studies. In: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, 1990, pp 169-186
8. Sandelowski M: The problem of rigor in qualitative research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1986; 8:27-37
9. Koch T: Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decisions trail. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19:976-986
10. Burns N: Standards for qualitative research. Nurs Sci Q 1989; 2:44-52
11. Glaser BG: More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1996
12. Glaser BG: Gerund Grounded Theory: The Basic Social Process Dissertation. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1996
13. Lusthaus C, Adrien MH, Anderson G, et al (Eds): Organizational motivation. In: Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance. Ottawa, Canada, International Development Research Centre, 2002, pp 97-99
14. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM: Improving the quality of healthcare in the United Kingdom and the United States: A framework for change. Milbank Q 2001; 79:281-315
15. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8:iii-iv, 1-72
16. McMullin J, Cook D, Griffith L, et al: Minimizing errors of omission: Behavioural rE-enforcement of Heparin to Avert Venous Emboli. The BEHAVE study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:694-699
17. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Neilands TB, et al: The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: A trial of clinical units. BMC Health Serv Res 2005; 5:28
18. Miles MB, Huberman AM: Early steps in analysis. In: An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Second Edition. London, Sage Publications, 1994, p 64