|
Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 864-867
|
What impact have NICE guidelines had on the trends of hip arthroplasty since their publication? The results from the trent regional arthroplasty study between 1990 and 2005
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BONE CEMENT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HIP PROSTHESIS;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY CONTROL;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
REOPERATION;
TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
GUIDELINE ADHERENCE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 34548251447
PISSN: 0301620X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.18593 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (1)
|