Radiologic errors and malpractice: A blurry distinction

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 189, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 517-522

  Berlin, Leonard ^a,b  

^a RUSH NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Malpractice; Medical legal; Radiologic errors

Indexed keywords

AUTOPSY; COMPENSATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL ERROR; NEGLIGENCE; PHYSICIAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY ANALYSIS;

DEFENSIVE MEDICINE; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MALPRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RADIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548239628     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2209     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Moskop JC, Geiderman JM, Hobgood CD, Larkin GL. Emergency physicians and disclosure of medical errors. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48:523-531
2. Collins v Lake Forest Hospital, 798 NE2d 143 (Il App 2003)
3. Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 2004; 1:59-65
4. Meena v Wilburn, 603 So2d 866 (Miss 1992)
5. Berlin L. Are radiologists contracted by third parties to interpret radiographs liable for not communicating results directly to patients? AJR 2002; 178:27-33
6. Berlin L. Proximate cause. AJR 2002; 179:569-573
7. Berlin L, Berlin J. Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation. AJR 1995; 165:781-788
8. Berlin L. Radiologic malpractice litigation: a view of the past, a gaze at the present, a glimpse of the future. AJR 2003; 181:1481-1486
9. Landon v Humphrey, 9 Conn 209 (1832)
10. McCandless v McWha, 22 Pa 261 (1853)
11. Richie v West, 23 Ill 329 (1860)
12. Smith v Overby, 30 Ga 241 (1860)
13. MacKinzie v Carman, 92 NYS 1063-1067 (1905)
14. In re Johnson's estate, Douglas v Johnson, 16 NW2d 504 (Neb 1944)
15. Todd v Eitel Hospital, 237 NW2d 357 (Minn 1975)
16. Spike v Sellett, 430 E2d 597 (Ill App 1981)
17. Riggins v Mauriello, 603 A2d 827 (Del 1992)
18. Skeffington v Bradley, 115 NW2d 303 (Mich 1962)
19. Black v Gunderson Clinic, Ltd., 152 Wisc. 2d 210 (1989)
20. Jewett v Our Lady of Mercy Hospital of Mariemont, 612 NE2d 724 (Ohio App 1992)
21. Advincula v United Blood Services, 678 NE2d 1009 (Ill 1996)
22. Department of Regulation and Licensing v State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board, 572 NW2d 508 (Wis App 1997)
23. [No authors listed] Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, 1993:1589, 1892
24. Berlin L. Defending the "missed" radiographic diagnosis. AJR 2000; 176:317-322
25. Potchen EJ, Bisesi MA. When is it malpractice to miss lung cancer on chest radiographs? Radiology 1990; 175:29-32
26. Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H. Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75:562-567
27. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:370-376
28. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 38:261-271
29. Berlin L. Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past 5 decades? AJR 2007;188:1173-1178
30. Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Uhlenhopp MA. Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. Radiology 1983; 148:609-615
31. Harvey JA, Fajardo LL, Innis CA. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs. blinded interpretation. AJR 1993; 161:1167-1172
32. Brennan TA, Hebert LE, Laird N, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care. JAMA 1991; 265:3265-3269
33. Hawkins SA, Hastie R. Hindsight: biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychol Bull 1990; 107:311-327
34. LaBine SJ, LaBine G. Determinations of negligence and the hindsight bias. Law Hum Behav 1996; 20:501-516
35. Kamin KA, Rachlinski JJ. Determining liability in hindsight. Law Hum Behav 1995; 19:89-104
36. Merry A, McCall Smith A. Errors, medicine, and the law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003:162-164, 194-198
37. Berlin L. Outcome bias. AJR 2004; 183:557-560
38. Brennan TA, Sox CM, Burstin HR. Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1963-1967
39. Turner DA. Teaching editorial: observer variability - what to do until perfect diagnostic tests are invented. J Nucl Med 1978; 19:435-437
40. Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M, et al. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1933-1940
41. Caldwell C, Seamone ER. Excusable neglect in malpractice suits against radiologists: a proposed jury instruction to recognize the human condition. Ann Hlth Law 2007; 16:43-77
42. Berlin L. Does the "missed" radiographic diagnosis constitute malpractice? Radiology 1977; 123:523-527