Patient dose from 3D rotational neurovascular studies

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 80, Issue 953, 2007, Pages 362-366

  Bridcut, Ruth R ^a   Murphy, E ^b   Workman, A ^a   Flynn, P ^b   Winder, R J ^c  

^a ROYAL GROUP OF HOSPITALS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL; IOMERON 300; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID ARTERIES; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROTATION;

EID: 34548236892     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/95349672     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique and experimental results. J Neurosurg 1991;75:1-7.
2. Missler U, Hundt C, Wiesmann M, Mayer T, Bruckmann H. Three-dimensional reconstructed rotational digital subtraction angiography in planning treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Eur Radiol 2000;10:564-8.
3. Moret J, Kemkers R, Op de Beek J, Koppe R, Klotz E, Grass M. 3D rotational angiography: Clinical value in endovascular treatment. Medicamundi 1998;42:8-14.
4. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1984;1:612-19.
5. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Trousset Y, Launay L, Kerrien E, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218: 799-808.
6. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60. Pergamon Press, Oxford. Ann ICRP 1991;21.
7. Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J, Roskopf ML. Patient size and X-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses. Med Phys 2004;31:588-94.
8. Cranley K, Gilmore BJ, Fogarty GWA, Desponds L, Sutton DG. Catalogue of diagnostic X-ray spectra and other data. IPEM Report 78 (CD-ROM). York: IPEM, 1997.
9. Cristy M. Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose, NUREG/CR-1159, ORNL/NUREG/ TM-367. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1980.
10. Hart D, Jones G, Wall BF. Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. NRPB-R262. Chilton: NRPB, 1994.
11. Schultz FW, Geleijns J, Spoelstra FM, Zoetelief J. Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations. Br J Radiol 2003;76:638-47.
12. Marshall NW, Noble J, Faulkner K. Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiological procedures. Br J Radiol 1995;68:495-501.
13. McParland BJ. A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures. Br J Radiol 1998;71:175-85.
14. Mooney RB, McKinstry CS, Kamel HAM. Absorbed dose and deterministic effects to patients from interventional neuroradiology. Br J Radiol 2000;73:745-51.