The role of public participation in the genetically modified organisms debate

Environmental and Planning Law Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 519-535

  Chin, Geraldine ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548231029     PISSN: 0813300X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. For details of the current regulatory system, see IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
2. Telephone interview by Geraldine Chin with Craig Cormack, Manager, Public Awareness Program, Biotechnology Australia, 7 June 2000.
3. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
4. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
5. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
6. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
7. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
8. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
9. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
10. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
11. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
12. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
13. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
14. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
15. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
16. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
17. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
18. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
19. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
20. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
21. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
22. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
23. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
24. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
25. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
26. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
27. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
28. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
29. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
30. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
31. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
32. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
33. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
34. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
35. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
36. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
37. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
38. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
39. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
40. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
41. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
42. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
43. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
44. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
45. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
46. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
47. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
48. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
49. Administrative Review Council, "What Decisions Should be Subject to Merits Review", Commonwealth of Australia, 1999, p 1.
50. Administrative Review Council, "What Decisions Should be Subject to Merits Review", Commonwealth of Australia, 1999, p 1.
51. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
52. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
53. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
54. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
55. .
56. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
57. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
58. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
59. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
60. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
61. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
62. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
63. IOGTR Overview: Current regulatory and administrative arrangements for controlling genetically modified organisms in Australia October 1999: .
64. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
65. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
66. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
67. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
68. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
69. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
70. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
71. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
72. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
73. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
74. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
75. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
76. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
77. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
78. Second Reading Speech, Minister for Health and Aged Care, House of Representatives Hansard, 22 June 2000.
79. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
80. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
81. Telephone interview by Geraldine Chin with Neil Ellis, Policy Division, IOGTR, 2 June 2000.
82. Personal correspondence from Helen Kosmas, IOGTR to Geraldine Chin, 7 July 2000.
83. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
84. Section 40, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
85. Part 5, Div 4, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
86. Section 49, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
87. See ss 50 and 51, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
88. See ss 50 and 51, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
89. Section 52 Gene Technology Bill 2000.
90. See ss 55 and 56, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
91. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
92. Note the legislative requirement that all submissions must be considered: ss 50 and 51, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
93. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
94. Sections 49(3)(b), 52(2)(b) and 54, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
95. Part 9, Div 6, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
96. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
97. For example under Pt 5, Div 5 of the Bill which deals with the final decision Gene Technology Bill 2000.
98. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
99. Part 8, Div 3, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
100. Section 108, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
101. Section 107, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
102. This is currently not required under ss 50 and 52 of the Gene Technology Bill 2000.
103. See s 100, Gene Technology Bill 2000.
104. Section 22(l)(c), Gene Technology Bill 2000.
105. Section 22(l)(g), Gene Technology Bill 2000.
106. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
107. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
108. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
109. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
110. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
111. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
112. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
113. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
114. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
115. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
116. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
117. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
118. The briefing paper can be found at: .
119. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
120. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
121. nd Ed, Butterworths, 1987), pp 37.
122. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
123. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
124. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
125. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
126. A second evaluation report is being prepared which will assess the impact and potential of the Conference for influencing government policy.
127. R v Trade Practices Tribunal, ex parte St George County Council (1974), 130 CLR 533.
128. See also: Criminal Justice Commission v Queensland Advocacy Inc (1996) 2 Qd R 118 at 124 per Macrossan CJ, at 145 per Demack J.
129. CSIRO "CSIRO Welcomes Gene Conference Outcome" Media Release, 12 March 1999: .