A world without meta-analysis

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 281-291

  Shadish, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta Analysis; Random Sampling

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548222138     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-007-9034-0     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Berk, R. A., & DeLeeuw, J. (1999). An evaluation of California's inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1045-1052.
2. Berk, R. A., Lenihan, K. J., & Rossi, P. H. (1980). Crime and poverty: Some experimental evidence from ex-offenders. American Sociological Review, 45, 766-786.
3. Berk, R. A., & Rauma, D. (1983). Capitalizing on nonrandom assignment to treatment: A regression discontinuity evaluation of a crime control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 21-27.
4. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
5. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago: Aldine.
6. Campbell, D. T. (1988). In E. S. Overman (Ed), Methodology and epistemology for social science: selected papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Cooper, H. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 442-449.
9. Cowman, C., & Conroy, R. M. (2004). A response to "Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers". Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46, 221-222.
10. Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in meta-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517.
11. Glass, G. V. (1995). Review of H. M. Cooper and L.V. Hedges (Ed.), Handbook of research synthesis. Contemporary Psychology, 40, 736-738.
12. Glass, G. V. & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical Methods in Education & Psychology (3rd Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Harlow, L. A., Mulaik, S. A. & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Holton, G. (1986). The advancement of science, and its burdens. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005a). Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 218-228.
16. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005b). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, 696-701. (accessed online at http://www.plosmedicine. org, February 18, 2007).
17. Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Lau, J. (2001). Evolution of treatment effects over time: Empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 831-836.
18. Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2005). Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 543-549.
19. Malzahn, U., Bohning, D., & Holling, H. (2000). Nonparametric estimation of heterogeneity variance for the standardized difference used in meta-analysis. Biometrika, 87, 619-632.
20. McCullough, B. D., & Wilson, B. (1999). On the accuracy of statistical procedure in Microsoft Excel 97. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 31, 27-37.
21. Montori, V. M., Devereaux, P. J., Adhikari, N. K. J., Burns, K. E. A., Eggert, C. H. et al. (2005). Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 2203-2209.
22. Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Buehler, J. (2003). "'Scared Straight' and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency" (Updated C2 Review). In: The Campbell Collaboration Reviews of Intervention and Policy Evaluations (C2-RIPE), November, 2003. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Campbell Collaboration. (Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/doc-pdf/ssrupdt.pdf on February 18, 2007).
23. Raudenbush, S.W. (1994). Random effects models. In H.M. Cooper and L.V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of Research Synthesis (pp. 301-321). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Rubin, D. B. (1992). Literature synthesis or effect-size surface estimation? Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 363-374.
25. Schulze, R. (2004). Meta-analysis: a comparison of approaches. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Hogrefe and Huber.
26. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
27. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: a psychology of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Simonton, D. K. (1993). Blind variations, chance configurations, and creative genius. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 225-228.
29. Trikalinos, T. A., Churchill, R., Ferrid, M., Leuchte, S., Tuunainenf, A., Wahlbeck, K., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2004). Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 1124-1130.
30. Van Den Noortgate, W. & Onghena, P. (2005). Parametric and nonparametric boostrap methods for meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 11-22.
31. Watson, R. (2004). A response to "Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers". Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46, 220-221.
32. Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
33. Williamson, G. R. (2003). Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 278-288.
34. Williamson, G. R. (2004). A response to Watson's and Cowman and Conroy's critiques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46, 222-223.