Characteristics of diagnostic tests used in the 2002 low-pathogenicity avian influenza H7N2 outbreak in Virginia

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 341-348

  Elvinger, François ^a,f   Akey, Bruce L ^b   Senne, Dennis A ^c   Pierson, F William ^a   Porter Spalding, Barbara A ^d   Spackman, Erica ^e   Suarez, David L ^e  

^a VIRGINIA MARYLAND REGIONAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c National Veterinary Services Laboratories   (United States)

^d UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^e AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^f NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Avian influenza; Bayesian; Diagnostic test validation; RRT PCR

Indexed keywords

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AVIAN INFLUENZA; CHICKEN; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EPIDEMIC; INFLUENZA VIRUS A; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; TURKEY (BIRD); UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VIROLOGY;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; INFLUENZA A VIRUS; INFLUENZA IN BIRDS; TURKEYS; VIRGINIA;

EID: 34548211874     PISSN: 10406387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104063870701900401     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Akey BL: 2003, Lpw-pathogenicity H7N2 avian influenza outbreak in Virginia during 2002. Avian Dis 47:1099-1103.
2. Branscum AJ, Gardner IA, Johnson WO: 2005, Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling. Prev Vet Med 68:145-163.
3. Conraths FJ, Schares G: 2006, Validation of molecular-diagnostic techniques in the parasitological laboratory. Vet Parasitol 136:91-98.
4. Davison S, Ziegler AF, Eckroade RJ: 1998, Comparison of an antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay with virus isolation for avian influenza from field samples. Avian Dis 42: 791-795.
5. Enoe C, Georgiadis MP, Johnson WO: 2000, Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. Prev Vet Med 45:61-81.
6. Gardner IA, Stryhn H, Lind P, Collins MT: 2000, Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveil[IPQ] lance of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 45:107-122.
7. Georgiadis MP, Johnson WO, Gardner IA, Singh R: 2003, Correlation-adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests. Appl Stat 52:63-76.
8. Jacobson RH: 1998, Validation of serological assays for diagnosis of infectious diseases. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 17:469-486.
9. Johnson WO, Gastwirth JL, Pearson LM: 2001, Screening without a "gold standard": the Hui-Walter paradigm revis[IPQ] ited. Am J Epidemiol 153:921-924.
10. Panigrahy B, Senne DA, Pedersen JC: 2002, Avian influenza virus subtypes inside and outside the live bird markets, 1993-2000: a spatial and temporal relationship. Avian Dis 46:298-307.
11. Spackman E, Senne DA, Bulaga LL, et al.: 2003, Development of multiplex real-time RT-PCR as a diagnostic tool for avian influenza. Avian Dis 47:1087-1090.
12. Spackman E, Senne DA, Myers TJ, et al.: 2002, Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes. J Clin Microbiol 40:3256-3260.
13. Spackman E, Suarez DL: 2005, Use of a novel virus inactivation method for a multicenter avian influenza real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction proficiency study. J Vet Diagn Invest 17:76-80.
14. Thayer SG, Beard CW: 1998, Serologic procedures. In: A laboratory manual for the isolation and identification of avian pathogens, eds. Swayne DE, Glisson JR, Jackwood MW, et al., 4th ed., pp. 255-266. American Association of Avian Pathologists, Kennett Square, PA.
15. Tumpey TM, Kapczynski DR, Swayne DE: 2004, Comparative susceptibility of chickens and turkeys to avian influenza A H7N2 virus infection and protective efficacy of a commercial avian influenza H7N2 virus vaccine. Avian Dis 48:167-176.
16. Van Deusen RA, Hinshaw VS, Senne DA, Pellacani D: 1983, Micro-neuraminidase-inhibition assay for classification of influenza A virus neuraminidases. Avian Dis. 27:745-750.
17. World Organization for Animal Health: 2005, Standard operating procedure (SOP) for OIE validation and certification of diagnostic assays. Version 1.8 (09/2005). 26 pages. In: Validation and Certification of Diagnostic Assays, http://www.oie.int/vcda/eng/en_fichier_SOP.pdf. Last accessed December 19, 2006.
18. World Organization for Animal Health: 2004, Chapter 1.1.3. Principles of validation of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases. 15 pages. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mmanual/A_00013.htm. Last accessed December 19, 2006.
19. World Organization for Animal Health: 2004, Chapter 1.1.4. Validation and quality control of polymerase chain reaction methods used for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. 11 pages. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mmanual/A_00014. htm. Last accessed December 19, 2006.