Characteristics of a successful estuarine invader: Evidence of self-compatibility in native and non-native lineages of Phragmites australis

Marine Ecology Progress Series

Volumn 337, Issue , 2007, Pages 299-301

  Lambert, Adam M ^a   Casagrande, Richard A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Common reed; Competition; Invasive species; Self pollination

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DISPERSAL; ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM; GRASS; NUTRIENT CYCLING; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

NORTH AMERICA;

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 34548209828     PISSN: 01718630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/meps337299     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Antonovics J (1968) Evolution of closely adjacent populations. V. Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity 23:219-238
2. Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) Genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, p 147-172
3. Carlton JT (1996) Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77:1653-1655
4. Chambers RM, Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K (1999) Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquat Bot 64:261-273
5. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237-268
6. Clevering OA, Lissner J (1999) Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 64:185-208
7. Daehler CC (1999) Inbreeding depression in smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora, Poaceae) invading San Francisco Bay. Am J Bot 86:131-139
8. Dudash MR, Murren CJ, Carr DE (2005) Using Mimulus as a model system to understand the role of inbreeding in conservation: genetic and ecological approaches. Ann Mo Bot Gard 92:36-51
9. Galloway LF, Etterson JR, Hamrick JL (2003) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the herbaceous autotetraploid, Campanula americana. Heredity 90:308-315
10. Gustafsson A, Simak M (1963) X-ray photography and seed sterility in Phragmites communis Trin. Hereditas 49:442-450
11. Husband BC, Barrett SCH (1991) Colonisation history and population genetic structure of Eichornia paniculata in Jamaica. Heredity 66:287-296
12. Ishii J, Kadono Y (2002) Factors influencing seed production of Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 72:129-141
13. Lambert AM, Casagrande RA (2006) Distribution of native and exotic Phragmites australis in Rhode Island. Northeast Nat 13:551-560
14. Lathrop RG, Windham L, Montesano P (2003) Does Phragmites expansion alter the structure and function of marsh landscapes? Patterns and processes revisited. Estuaries 26:423-435
15. Marks M, Lapin B, Randall J (1994) Phragmites australis (P. communis): threats, management, and monitoring. Nat Area J 4:285-294
16. Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K, Windham L, Kiviat E, Findlay S (2000) A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish environments in North America. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:89-103
17. Richards CM (2000) Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am Nat 155:383-394
18. Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2445-2449
19. Saltonstall K (2003a) Genetic variation among North American populations of Phragmites australis: implications for management. Estuaries 26:444-451
20. Saltonstall K (2003b) Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Mol Ecol 12:1689-1702
21. Saltonstall K, Peterson PM, Soreng RJ (2004) Recognition of Phragmites australis subsp. americanus (Poaceae: Arundionideae) in North America: evidence from morphological and genetic analyses. SIDA Contrib Bot 21:683-692