Assessing the risk of foliar injury from ozone on vegetation in parks in the U.S. National Park Service's Vital Signs Network

Environmental Pollution

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 348-357

  Kohut, Robert ^a  

^a United States Department of Agriculture   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioindicator species; Foliar injury; Ozone; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; OZONE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL MOISTURE;

BIOINDICATOR SPECIES; FOLIAR INJURIES; OZONE EXPOSURE;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

OZONE;

BIOINDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOLIAGE; INJURY; NATIONAL PARK; OZONE; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL MOISTURE; VEGETATION;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOLIAGE; OZONE LAYER; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; VEGETATION;

AIR POLLUTANTS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; OXIDANTS, PHOTOCHEMICAL; OZONE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEASONS; SOIL; TREES; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WATER MOVEMENTS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548207357     PISSN: 02697491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartholomay G.A., Eckert R.T., and Smith K.T. Reductions in tree-ring width of white pine following ozone exposure at Acadia National Park, Maine, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27 (1997) 361-368
2. Bennett J.P., and Banerjee M. Air pollution vulnerability of 22 Midwestern parks. Journal of Environmental Management 44 (1995) 339-360
3. Benoit L.F., Skelly J.M., Moore L.D., and Dochinger L.S. Radial growth reductions of Pinus strobus correlated with foliar ozone sensitivity as an indicator of ozone induced losses in Eastern forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12 (1982) 673-678
4. Chappelka A., Renfro J., Somers G., and Nash B. Evaluation of ozone injury on foliage of black cherry (Prunus serotina) and tall milkweed (Asclepias exaltata) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environmental Pollution 95 (1997) 13-18
5. Chappelka A., Skelly J., Somers G., Renfro J., and Hildebrand E. Mature black cherry used as a bioindicator of ozone injury. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 116 (1999) 261-266
6. Chappelka A., Somers G., and Renfro J. Visible ozone injury on forest trees in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 116 (1999) 255-260
7. Chappelka A.H., Neufeld H.S., Davison A.W., Somers G.L., and Renfro J.R. Ozone injury on cutleaf coneflower (Rudbeckia laciniata) and crown-beard (Verbesina occidentalis) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environmental Pollution 125 (2003) 53-59
8. Davis D.D., McClenahen J.R., and Hutnik R.J. Evaluation of vegetation near coal-burning power plants in southwestern Pennsylvania: II. Ozone injury on foliage of hybrid poplar. Journal of Air and Waste Management 43 (1993) 760-764
9. Duchelle S.F., and Skelly J.M. Response of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) to oxidant air pollution in the Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, USA. Plant Disease 65 (1981) 661-663
10. Duchelle S.F., Skelly J.M., Sharick T.L., Chevone B.L., Yang Y.S., and Nellessen J.E. Effects of ozone on the productivity of natural vegetation in a high meadow of the Shenandoah National Park of Virginia, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 17 (1983) 299-308
11. Eckert R.T., Kohut R., Lee T., and Staplefeldt K. Foliar Ozone Injury on Native Vegetation at Acadia National Park: Results from a Six-year (1992-1997) Field Survey (1999), US National Park Service. Air Resources Division, Denver, CO 42 pp.
12. Faith R., and Sheshinski R. Misspecification of trend in spatial random-function interpolation with application to oxidant mapping (1979), SIAM Institute for Mathematics and Society. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA Technical Report No. 28
13. Grivet C.D. Modeling and analysis of air quality data (1980), SIAM Institute for Mathematics and Society. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA Technical Report No. 43
14. Grulke N.E., Johnson R., Esperanza A., Jones D., Nguyen T., Posch S., and Tausz M. Canopy transpiration of Jeffrey pine in mesic and xeric microsites: O3 uptake and injury response. Trees 17 (2003) 292-298
15. Heck W.W., and Cowling E.B. The need for a long-term cumulative secondary ozone standard-an ecological perspective. Environmental Management (January) (1997) 23-33
16. Hildebrand E., Skelly J.M., and Fredericksen T.S. Foliar response of ozone-sensitive hardwood tree species from 1991 to 1993 in the Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26 (1996) 658-669
17. Kahn S., and Soja G. Yield responses of wheat to ozone exposure as modified by drought-induced differences in ozone uptake. Water Air and Soil Pollution 147 (2003) 299-315
18. Lefohn A.S., Jackson W., Shadwick D., and Knudsen H.P. Effect of surface ozone exposures on vegetation grown in the Southern Appalachian Mountains: identification of possible areas of concern. Atmospheric Environment 31 (1997) 1695-1708
19. Matheron G. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology 58 (1963) 1246-1266
20. Matyssek R., Le Thiec D., Loew M., Dizengremel P., Nunn A.J., and Haeberle K.H. Interactions between drought and O-3 stress in forest trees. Plant Biology 8 (2006) 11-17
21. Neufeld H.S., Renfro J.R., Hacker W.D., and Silsbee D. Ozone in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: dynamics and effects on plants. In: Berglund R.D. (Ed). Tropospheric Ozone and the Environment II (1992), Air and Waste Management Association Press, Pittsburgh, PA 594-617
22. Panek J.A. Ozone uptake, water loss and carbon exchange dynamics in annually drought-stressed Pinus ponderosa forests: Measured trends and parameters for uptake modeling. Tree Physiology 24 (2004) 277-290
23. Panek J.A., and Goldstein A.H. Response of stomatal conductance to drought in ponderosa pine: Implications for carbon and ozone uptake. Tree Physiology 21 (2001) 337-344
24. Peterson D.L., Arbaugh M.J., Wakefield V.A., and Miller P.R. Evidence of growth reduction in ozone injured Jeffrey pine (Pinus jefferyi Grev., Balf). in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California, USA. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 37 (1987) 906-912
25. Reich P. Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiology 3 (1987) 63-91
26. Smith G., Coulston J., Jepsen E., and Pritchard T. A national ozone biomonitoring program: Results from field surveys of ozone sensitive plants in northeastern forests (1994-2000. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 87 (2003) 271-291
27. Temple P.J., Kupper R.S., Lennox R.W., and Rohr K. Injury and yield responses of differentially irrigated cotton to ozone. Agronomy Journal 80 (1988) 751-755
28. Temple P.J., Riechers G.H., and Miller P.R. Foliar injury response of ponderosa pine seedlings to ozone and wet and dry deposition and drought. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32 (1992) 101-113
29. U.S. National Park Service. Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on National Park Service and US Fish and Wildlife Service Lands. NPS D1522. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRARD/NRR-2003/01 (2003), Air Resources Division, Denver, CO. 21 pp. Available at www2.nature.nps.gov/ard/pubs/index.htm
30. Williams W.T., Brady M., and Willison S.C. Air Pollution damage to the forests of the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 27 (1977) 230-234