Spatial patterns of macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in streams in relation to physical variables and land-cover in Southwestern France

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1215-1225

  Compin, Arthur ^a   Céréghino, Régis ^a  

^a Université de Toulouse   (France)

Author keywords

Bioassessment; Community structure; Environmental filters; Freshwater invertebrates; Landscape alterations; River continuum

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ALGORITHM; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FEEDING; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; LANDSCAPE; MACROINVERTEBRATE; RIPARIAN ZONE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 34548184715     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9101-y     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. A.F.N.O.R. (1992) Essais des eaux. Détermination de l'Indice Biologique Global Normalisé (I.B.G.N.) Norme française T 90-350:1-8
2. Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land-use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:257-284
3. Bailey RC, Norris RH, Reynoldson TB (2003) Bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems using the reference condition approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, USA
4. Basnyat P, Teeter LD, Flynn KM, Lockaby BG (1999) Relationships between landscape characteristics and nonpoint source pollution inputs to coastal estuaries. Environe Manage 23:539-549
5. Bij de Vaate A, Pavluk TI (2004) Practicability of the Index of Trophic Completeness for running waters. Hydrobiologia 519:49-60
6. Blasius BJ, Merritt RW (2002) Field and laboratory investigations on the effects of road salt (NaCl) on stream macroinvertebrate communities. Environ Pollut 120:219-231
7. Blayo F, Demartines P (1991) Data analysis: how to compare Kohonen neural networks to other techniques?. In: Prieto A (ed) Artificial neural networks. International Workshop IWANN '91. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 469-476
8. Céréghino R, Park YS, Compin A, Lek S (2003) Predicting the species richness of aquatic insects in streams using a limited number of environmental variables. J N Am Benthol Soc 22:442-456
9. Cruickshank MM, Tomlison RW (1996) Application of CORINE land cover methodology to the UK. Some issues raised from Northern Ireland. Global Ecol Biogeogr 4/5:235-248
10. Cummins KW (1974) Structure and function of stream ecosystems. Bioscience 24:631-641
11. Cummins KW, Klug MJ (1979) Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:147-172
12. Davies PE, Cook LSJ, McIntosh PD, Munks SA (2005) Changes in stream biota along a gradient of logging disturbance, 15 years after logging at Ben Nevis, Tasmania Forest. Ecol Manage 219:132-148
13. Delong MD, Brusven MA (1998) Macroinvertebrate community structure along the longitudinal gradient of an agriculturally impacted stream. Environ Manage 22:445-457
14. Dolédec S, Phillips N, Scarsbrook M, Riley RH, Townsend CR (2006) Comparison of structural and functional approaches to determining landuse effects on grassland stream invertebrate communities. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:44-60
15. Elliott SR, Naiman RJ, Bisson PA (2004) Riparian influences on the biophysical characteristics of seston in headwater streams. Northwest Sci 78:150-157
16. Gevrey M, Dimopoulos L, Lek S (2003) Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model 160:249-264
17. Giraudel JL, Lek S (2001) A comparison of self-organizing map algorithm and some conventional statistical methods for ecological community ordination. Ecol Model 146(1-3):329-339
18. Hawkins CP, Norris RH, Gerritsen J, Hughes RM, Jackson SK, Johnson RK, Stevenson RJ (2000) Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:541-556
19. Hynes HBN (1975) The stream and its valley. Verh Int Ver Theor Ang Limnol 19:1-15
20. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cyber 43:59-69
21. Kohonen T (2001) Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
22. Larranaga A, Larranaga S, Basaguren A, Elosegi A, Pozo J (2006) Assessing impact of eucalyptus plantations on benthic macroinvertebrate communities by a litter exclusion experiment. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 42:1-8
23. Lecerf A, Dobson M, Dang CK, Chauvet E (2005) Riparian plant species loss alters trophic dynamics in detritus-based stream ecosystems. Oecologia 146:432-442
24. Lek S, Guégan JF (2000). Artificial Neuronal Networks: application to ecology and evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
25. Levine ER, Kimes DS, Sigillito VG (1996) Classifying soil structure using neural networks. Ecol Model 92:101-108
26. Maridet L, Wasson JG, Philippe M, Amoros C, Naiman RJ (1998) Trophic structure of three streams with contrasting riparian vegetation and geomorphology. Arch Hydrobiol 144:61-85
27. Merritt RW, Cummins KW (1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd edn. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, USA
28. Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB, Novak JA, Higgins MJ, Wessell KJ, Lessard JL (2002) Development and application of a macroinvertebrate functional-group approach in the bioassessment of remanant river oxbows in southwest Florida. J N Am Benthol Soc 21:290-310
29. Moore AA, Palmer MA (2005) Invertebrate biodiversity in agricultural and urban headwater streams: Implications for conservation and management. Ecol Appl 15:1169-1177
30. Oertli B (1993) Leaf litter processing and energy flow through macroinvertebrates in a woodland pond (Switzerland). Oecologia 96:466-477
31. Özesmi S, Özesmi U (1999) An artificial neural network approach to spatial habitat modelling with interspecific interaction. Ecol Model 116:15-31
32. Park YS, Céréghino R, Compin A, Lek S (2003) Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters. Ecol Model 160:265-280
33. Pavluk TI, Bij de Vaate A, Leslie HA (2000) Development of an Index of Trophic Completeness for benthic macroinvertebrate communities in flowing waters. Hydrobiologia 427:135-141
34. Raivio K (2006) Analysis of soft handover measurements in 3G network. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM international Symposium on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (Terromolinos, Spain, October 02-06, 2006), MSWiM '06. ACM Press, New York, pp 330-337
35. Recknagel F, French M, Harkonen P, Yabunaka KI (1997) Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms. Ecol Model 96:11-28
36. Rios SL, Bailey RC (2006) Relationship between riparian vegetation and stream benthic communities at three spatial scales. Hydrobiologia 553:153-160
37. Sachon G, Wasson JG (2002) La directive Eau de l'Union européenne. Conséquences pour la recherche. Nat Sci Soc 10:93-95
38. Santoul F, Cayrou J, Mastrorillo S, Céréghino R (2005) Spatial patterns of the biological traits of freshwater fish communities in S.W. France. J Fish Biol 66:301-314
39. Sirola M, Lampi G, Parviainen J (2004) Using self-organizing map in a computerized decision support system. In: Pal NR, Kasabov N, Mudi RK, Pal S, Parui SK (eds) Neural information processing, 11th International Conference, ICONIP 2004, Calcutta, India, November 22-25, 2004. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 136-141
40. Slavik K, Peterson BJ, Deegan LA, Bowden WB, Hershey AE, Hobbie JE (2004) Long-term responses of the Kuparuk River ecosystem to phosphorus fertilization. Ecology 85:938-954
41. Sliva L, Williams DD (2001) Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality. Water Res 35:3462-3472
42. Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templete for ecological strategies?. J Anim Ecol 46:337-365
43. Sponseller RA, Benfield EF, Valett HM (2001) Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biol 46:1409-1424
44. Strayer DL, Beighley RE, Thompson LC, Brooks S, Nilsson C, Pinay G, Naiman RJ (2003) Effects of land cover on stream ecosystems: roles of empirical models and scaling issues. Ecosystems 6:407-423
45. Suren AM, McMurtrie S (2005) Assessing the effectiveness of enhancement activities in urban streams: II. Responses of invertebrate communities. River Res Appl 21:439-453
46. Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1994) Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biol 31:265-275
47. Tuma A, Haasis HD, Rentz O (1996) A comparison of fuzzy expert systems, neural networks and neuro-fuzzy approaches controlling energy and material flows. Ecol Model 85:93-98
48. Ultsch A, Siemon HP (1990) Kohonen's self organizing feature maps for exploratory data analysis. In: Proceeding of the INNC'90 International Neural Network Conference. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 305-308
49. Van Sickle J, Hughes RM (2000) Classification strengths of ecoregions, catchments, and geographic clusters for aquatic vertebrates in Oregon. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:370-384
50. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The River Continuum Concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130-137
51. Verneaux J, Galmiche P, Janier F, Monot A (1982) Une nouvelle méthode pratique d'évaluation de la qualité des eaux courantes. Un indice biologique de qualité générale. Annu Sci Univ Franche Comté 4:11-21
52. Vesanto J, Hollmen J (2003) An automated report generation tool for the data understanding phase. In: Abraham A, Jain L (eds) Innovations in intelligent systems: design, management and applications, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, chapter 5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
53. Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E, Parhankangas J (1999) Self-organising map in Matlab: the SOM Toolbox. In: Proceedings of the Matlab Digital Signal Processing Conference. Espoo, Finland, pp 35-40
54. Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E, Parhankangas J (2000) SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5. Technical Report A57, Neural Networks Research Centre, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland
55. Vondracek B, Blann KL, Cox CB, Nerbonne JF, Mumford KF, Nerbonne BA, Sovell LA, Zimmerman JKH (2005) Land use, spatial scale, and stream systems: lessons from an agricultural region. Environ Manage 36:775-791
56. Wallace JB, Webster JR (1996) The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annu Rev Entomol 41:115-139
57. Walley WJ, Martin RW, O'Connor MA (2000) Self-organising maps for classification of river quality from biological and environmental data. In: Denzer R, Swayne DA, Purvis M, Schimak G (eds) Environmental software systems: environmental information and decision support. IFIP Conference Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusset, USA, pp 27-41
58. Ward JV (1998) Riverine landscapes: Biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biol Conserv 83:269-278
59. Ward JV, Stanford JA (1983) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic systems. In: Fontaine TD, Bartell SM (eds) Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 347-356
60. Woodiwiss FS (1964) The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent river Board. Chem Ind 11:443-447
61. Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW, Furse MT (2000) Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK