Factors associated with exiting and reentry into out-of-home care under Community-Based Care in Florida

Children and Youth Services Review

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1352-1367

  Yampolskaya, Svetlana ^a   Armstrong, Mary I ^a   Vargo, Amy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community Based Care; Out of Home Care; Permanency; Reentry

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548181353     PISSN: 01907409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allison P.D. Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (1984), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA
2. Anderson R.L., Lyons J.S., Giles D.M., Price J.A., and Estle G. Reliability of the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths-Mental Health (CANS-MH) scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies 12 (2003) 279-289
3. Anderson R.L., and Estle G. Predicting level of mental health care among children served in a delivery system in a rural state. Journal of Rural Health 17 (2001) 259-265
4. Benedict M.I., and White R.B. Factors associated with foster care length of stay. Child Welfare League LXX (1991) 45-58
5. Barth R.P. Effects of age and race on the odds of adoption versus remaining in long-term out-of-home care. Child Welfare LXXVI (1997) 285-308
6. Courtney M.E., and Wong Y.I. Comparing the timing of exits from substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review 18 4/5 (1996) 307-334
7. Cox D.R. Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 34 (1972) 187-220
8. Craig C., Kulik T., James T., and Nielsen S. Blueprint for the privatization of child welfare (1998), Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Study, Los Angeles, CA #248
9. Florida Statute, Section 409.1671. Foster care and related services; privatization. Florida Legislative Session (1997)
10. Freundlich M., and Gerstenzang S. An assessment of the privatization of child welfare services: Challenges and successes (2003), Child Welfare League of America, Inc, Washington, DC
11. Huber P.J. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1 (1967) 221-233
12. Kaplan E.L., and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53 (1958) 457-481
13. Kapp S.A., McDonald T.P., and Diamond K.L. The path to adoption for children of color. Child Abuse & Neglect 25 (2001) 215-229
14. Lewandowski C.A., and Pierce L. Does family-centered out-of-home care work? Comparison of a family-centered approach and traditional care. Social Work Research 28 (2004) 143-151
15. Link M.K. Permanency outcomes in kinship care: A study of children placed in kinship care in Erie County, New York. Child Welfare LXXV (1996) 509-528
16. Lu Y.E., Landsverk J., Ellis-Macleod E., Newton R., Ganger W., and Johnson I. Race, ethnicity, and case outcomes in child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review 26 (2004) 447-461
17. Lyons J.S., Griffin E., Fazio M., and Lyons M.B. Child and adolescent needs & strengths. An information integration tool for children and adolescents with mental health challenges (1999), Buddin Praed Foundation, New York, NY
18. McCullough C., and Schmitt B. Management, finance, and contracting survey final report. Child Welfare League of America 2000 (2000)
19. McDonald T., Bryson S., and Poertner J. Balancing reunification and reentry goals. Children and Youth Services Review 28 (2006) 47-58
20. McMurty S.L., and Lie G. Differential exit rates of minority children in foster care. Social Work Research & Abstracts 28 (1992) 42-48
21. McMurtry S.L., and Lie G.W. Differential exit rates of minority children in foster care. Social Work Research and Abstracts 28 1 (1992) 42-48
22. Miller K.A., Fisher P.A., Fetrow B., and Jordan K. Trouble on the journey home: Reunification failures in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review 28 (2006) 260-274
23. Muthén L.K., and Muthén B.O. Mplus user's guide. Fourth Edition (1998-2007), Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA
24. Petr C.G., and Johnson I.C. Privatization of foster care in Kansas: A cautionary tale. Social Work 44 (1999) 263-267
25. Potter C.C., and Klein-Rothschild S. Getting home on time: Predicting timely permanence for young children. Child Welfare 81 2 (2002) 123-150
26. Smith B.D. After parental rights are terminated: Factors associated with exiting foster care. Children and Youth Services Review 25 (2003) 965-985
27. State of Florida Department of Children and Families. Allegation matrix (1998), Author, Tallahassee, Fl
28. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics (2001), Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
29. Terling T. The efficacy of family reunification practices: Reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children reunified with their families. Child Abuse and Neglect 23 (1999) 1359-1370
30. Wells K., and Guo S. Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children and Youth Services Review 21 (1999) 273-294
31. Vogel C.A. Using administrative databases to examine factors affecting length of stay in substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review 21 8 (1999) 677-690
32. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration of Children Youth and Families, Children's Bureau. Child welfare outcomes 1998: Annual report (1998), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children Bureau. The AFCARS report. Preliminary estimates for FY 2003 as of April 2005 (2005, April), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2001). 45 CFR Parts 1355, 1356 and 1357 Title IV-E Foster care eligibility reviews and child and family services state plan reviews; Final Rule. Federal Register, 65, No. 16, Tuesday, January 25, 2000, Rules and Regulations, Washington, D.C.
35. U.S. General Accounting Office. Child welfare: New financing and service strategies hold promise but effects unknown (GAO/T-HEHS-00-158) (2000), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC